由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
NCAA版 - 我密官司赢了-
相关主题
我密spring game热身贴我密的问题是QB是在水平太差
我密的防守进步显著希望我密的roundtree没大事儿
我看我密剩下比赛只能赢2场!route 66
今年最惨的是PSU啊Clemson will come back in 2007.
我密和Minni 打得很难解难分呀ugly loss by michigan....
其实我密篮球今年那很烂观OSU Wis后感
我密球迷要淡定昨天看Razorbacks Vs Gators
我密也不行啊Michigan不相信眼泪
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: university话题: um话题: aa话题: among话题: go
进入NCAA版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
m******j
发帖数: 440
1
对亚裔来说。
Go Blue!
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/22/supreme-co
"The percentages of African Americans among entering freshmen at the
University of California-Berkeley, UCLA and the University of Michigan were
the lowest among the nation's top universities in 2011."
这点我换了学校以后才深深感觉到……
t***u
发帖数: 20182
2
必须的,底特律还等着大家买下来呢
Y******e
发帖数: 20256
3
这个最高法院裁定,州里面的法案能盖过么?例如加州的那个。
m******j
发帖数: 440
4
我觉得这是个姿态。要是最高法说违宪,那就真坚持不住了,所有的非AA州估计都得被
翻过来。现在加州应该能喘口气了。我密也可以继续多招亚裔了。

【在 Y******e 的大作中提到】
: 这个最高法院裁定,州里面的法案能盖过么?例如加州的那个。
s**********d
发帖数: 36899
5

现在几个AA案子判的都比较具体,所以别州的不能直接引用。
密州肯定要服从,别的可以不一样。不过总体上AA在联邦层面
上是不行了。

【在 Y******e 的大作中提到】
: 这个最高法院裁定,州里面的法案能盖过么?例如加州的那个。
D***h
发帖数: 148
6
Except UM won nothing. and we are all grateful for that. the major culprit
in this abomination, Grutter, was brought to the courts by a student suing
UM law school, where the supreme court notoriously sided with the defendant
Bollinger, i.e. UM, to uphold the school's decision of using race as a
predominant factor in giving out admissions.

were

【在 m******j 的大作中提到】
: 对亚裔来说。
: Go Blue!
: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/22/supreme-co
: "The percentages of African Americans among entering freshmen at the
: University of California-Berkeley, UCLA and the University of Michigan were
: the lowest among the nation's top universities in 2011."
: 这点我换了学校以后才深深感觉到……

D***h
发帖数: 148
7
Yes. But not exactly. States can always roll out legislative agenda to tilt
the AA balance. The difference is that now it comes with the US supreme
court seal.

【在 Y******e 的大作中提到】
: 这个最高法院裁定,州里面的法案能盖过么?例如加州的那个。
Y******e
发帖数: 20256
8
是不是过几年,输的一方又可以上诉?
m******j
发帖数: 440
9
所以对我们来说,小小的利好。对State of Mich.来说,赢了官司,对吧?Law School
的case不是之前(2006年)的Ruling么?这个是关于Proposal 2(反AA)的。

defendant

【在 D***h 的大作中提到】
: Except UM won nothing. and we are all grateful for that. the major culprit
: in this abomination, Grutter, was brought to the courts by a student suing
: UM law school, where the supreme court notoriously sided with the defendant
: Bollinger, i.e. UM, to uphold the school's decision of using race as a
: predominant factor in giving out admissions.
:
: were

1 (共1页)
进入NCAA版参与讨论
相关主题
Michigan不相信眼泪我密和Minni 打得很难解难分呀
送paulus其实我密篮球今年那很烂
Michigan第一场分析我密球迷要淡定
UM vs MSU小结我密也不行啊
我密spring game热身贴我密的问题是QB是在水平太差
我密的防守进步显著希望我密的roundtree没大事儿
我看我密剩下比赛只能赢2场!route 66
今年最惨的是PSU啊Clemson will come back in 2007.
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: university话题: um话题: aa话题: among话题: go