d*******g
发帖数: 8992 | 1 所有专业的人士都会告诉Kelly“教练”，那么练次次都会被吹！
特别在最后时刻，如果那样都不吹，那FSU绝对是冤死的。
到了最后时刻，判罚一定要公正，要不然就是裁判而不是球员在“PLAY”啦！
输不起的家伙！ | b******l
发帖数: 758 | 2 靠，你是所谓的专业人士？自己照照镜子吧
到目前，ACC自己都没有说是正确的call。只是说是裁判自己的judegment，场上裁判自
己自相矛盾，到底是谁犯规都没有说清楚，一会是7号，一会是20号。 而且裁判还故意
遗漏了一个FSU犯规的call。
所有说一定是犯规的都可以XXSL
Doug Rhoads, the ACC head of officials, didn’t explicitly say whether or
not he agreed with the call, but he did offer a thorough explanation for the
offensive pass interference rule.
Offensive players, on passing plays, are restricted from going downfield
and blocking anytime from the snap. If the ball is first touched behind the
line of scrimmage, then that would be legal, and it's OK, but if the ball
is touched beyond the line, then it's offensive pass interference.
Rhoads made sure to point out that it’s a judgment call for the official.
Officials always have to exercise great judgment in calling a foul, and
offensive pass interference, or pick plays, as they're sometimes referred to
, are no different than other difficult judgments. The key element is that
the official must assess on the play if there is sufficient restriction for
it to be a foul, and he has to differentiate between incidental contact and
significant contact, or significant restriction, before he calls that foul.
仔细看看下面的video，到底是怎么回事。
http://m.wsbt.com/sports/a-new-look-at-that-controversial-call- | b******l
发帖数: 758 | 3 这是非常明显的FSU 防守出了漏洞，ACC裁判为了保住自己联盟的球队，所以才扔了黄
旗。 | A**u
发帖数: 701 | | G**c
发帖数: 1656 | | B****2
发帖数: 8892 | 6 问两个问题：
所有的Touchdown（or non-touchdown）应该是reviewable，这个球是否也是？这个球
，review officer有没有review过？
这个球是否Challageable的？Kelly能否challenge 这个call？ | b******l
发帖数: 758 | 7 NCAA一场比赛coach只能challenge 一次。Kelly在第一个4th down时就用掉了。我不知
道这种judgement call是否reviewable by booth | x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 8 犯规什么时候能challenge了？是我看球太少，还是本版新球迷太多 | N*********n
发帖数: 3584 | 9 这肯定不行啊。压根没有review的对象啊。
【在 b******l 的大作中提到】
: NCAA一场比赛coach只能challenge 一次。Kelly在第一个4th down时就用掉了。我不知
: 道这种judgement call是否reviewable by booth
| t***a
发帖数: 7982 | 10 Judgemental call, not challengeable
【在 B****2 的大作中提到】
: 问两个问题：
: 所有的Touchdown（or non-touchdown）应该是reviewable，这个球是否也是？这个球
: ，review officer有没有review过？
: 这个球是否Challageable的？Kelly能否challenge 这个call？
| | | B****2
发帖数: 8892 | 11 这就是为什么我在问。我只看主要的NCAA比赛，偶然看几场NFL的High Profile比赛。
搜了一下，NFL从2015年开始，犯规可能就可以challenge了。不知道NCAA有没有。
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/09/28/coachs-challeng
UPDATE 1:17 p.m. ET 9/29/14: NFL Network reported earlier on Sunday that
personal fouls could become reviewable in 2015. While the report lacked
some of the details mentioned above, including the likelihood that personal
fouls will be reviewed only by coach’s challenge and not automatically, the
NFLN report served as the starting point for our reporting. So I should
have mentioned the NFL Network report last night, even though NFLN, ESPN,
FOX, CBS, and the Associated Press routinely use our reports as the starting
point for their own reporting without giving us proper credit. We’ve
always tried to apply a higher standard than the standard that is applied to
PFT. On Sunday night, I failed to do that.
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: 犯规什么时候能challenge了？是我看球太少，还是本版新球迷太多
| j*******l
发帖数: 419 | 12 我照镜子了 你照了么？你给那录像根本不是犯规那人！illegal pick 教练还声称自己
coach这种play，无奈crying babe kelly了！希望ND进play off 然后rematch， 这教
练上台第一场bowl game就输给FSU！我在奥兰多看着他输了！希望再看他在bowl game
再输一次。
the
downfield
the
【在 b******l 的大作中提到】
: 靠，你是所谓的专业人士？自己照照镜子吧
: 到目前，ACC自己都没有说是正确的call。只是说是裁判自己的judegment，场上裁判自
: 己自相矛盾，到底是谁犯规都没有说清楚，一会是7号，一会是20号。 而且裁判还故意
: 遗漏了一个FSU犯规的call。
: 所有说一定是犯规的都可以XXSL
: Doug Rhoads, the ACC head of officials, didn’t explicitly say whether or
: not he agreed with the call, but he did offer a thorough explanation for the
: offensive pass interference rule.
: Offensive players, on passing plays, are restricted from going downfield
: and blocking anytime from the snap. If the ball is first touched behind the
| l*****8
发帖数: 16949 | 13 不懂NCAA,NFL里非judgement的call,比如12-men, ineligible downfield, 球是否被
tip before PI之类可以review.但PI这种judgement的call从来不允许review的。
personal
the
starting
【在 B****2 的大作中提到】
: 这就是为什么我在问。我只看主要的NCAA比赛，偶然看几场NFL的High Profile比赛。
: 搜了一下，NFL从2015年开始，犯规可能就可以challenge了。不知道NCAA有没有。
: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/09/28/coachs-challeng
: UPDATE 1:17 p.m. ET 9/29/14: NFL Network reported earlier on Sunday that
: personal fouls could become reviewable in 2015. While the report lacked
: some of the details mentioned above, including the likelihood that personal
: fouls will be reviewed only by coach’s challenge and not automatically, the
: NFLN report served as the starting point for our reporting. So I should
: have mentioned the NFL Network report last night, even though NFLN, ESPN,
: FOX, CBS, and the Associated Press routinely use our reports as the starting
| l*****8
发帖数: 16949 | 14 不懂NCAA,NFL里非judgement的call,比如12-men, ineligible downfield, 球是否被
tip before PI之类可以review.但PI这种judgement的call从来不允许review的。
personal
the
starting
【在 B****2 的大作中提到】
: 这就是为什么我在问。我只看主要的NCAA比赛，偶然看几场NFL的High Profile比赛。
: 搜了一下，NFL从2015年开始，犯规可能就可以challenge了。不知道NCAA有没有。
: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/09/28/coachs-challeng
: UPDATE 1:17 p.m. ET 9/29/14: NFL Network reported earlier on Sunday that
: personal fouls could become reviewable in 2015. While the report lacked
: some of the details mentioned above, including the likelihood that personal
: fouls will be reviewed only by coach’s challenge and not automatically, the
: NFLN report served as the starting point for our reporting. So I should
: have mentioned the NFL Network report last night, even though NFLN, ESPN,
: FOX, CBS, and the Associated Press routinely use our reports as the starting
| j**y
发帖数: 7014 | 15 PI是不能challenge的
【在 B****2 的大作中提到】
: 问两个问题：
: 所有的Touchdown（or non-touchdown）应该是reviewable，这个球是否也是？这个球
: ，review officer有没有review过？
: 这个球是否Challageable的？Kelly能否challenge 这个call？
| d********g
发帖数: 11948 | 16 No not reviewable
【在 b******l 的大作中提到】
: NCAA一场比赛coach只能challenge 一次。Kelly在第一个4th down时就用掉了。我不知
: 道这种judgement call是否reviewable by booth
| b***n
发帖数: 1210 | 17 2点纠正一下
1. ACC第二天说的确吹的是7号, 所以BK又有话题了.
2. BK上台第一场碗不是输给FSU.
game
【在 j*******l 的大作中提到】
: 我照镜子了 你照了么？你给那录像根本不是犯规那人！illegal pick 教练还声称自己
: coach这种play，无奈crying babe kelly了！希望ND进play off 然后rematch， 这教
: 练上台第一场bowl game就输给FSU！我在奥兰多看着他输了！希望再看他在bowl game
: 再输一次。
:
: the
: downfield
: the
| A**u
发帖数: 701 | 18 反正这个礼拜没有比赛，练练嘴皮也不错
【在 b***n 的大作中提到】
: 2点纠正一下
: 1. ACC第二天说的确吹的是7号, 所以BK又有话题了.
: 2. BK上台第一场碗不是输给FSU.
:
: game
| B****2
发帖数: 8892 | 19 Hope it is in future.
Copied from the same link:
Patriots coach Bill Belichick believes that coaches should be able to use
the red flag to challenge any and all rulings on the field. While the NFL
isn’t ready to go completely in that direction, coaches could soon be able
to challenge one specific type of play that isn’t currently reviewable.
Per a league source, momentum is building for allowing coaches to challenge
personal fouls.
The thinking is that personal fouls would become reviewable only via the
coach’s challenge, and not automatically.
The potential expansion would come in the offseason, most likely at the
annual meetings in March or during the May ownership meetings.
Both New England and Washington have been lobbying aggressively for coaches
to have the ability to challenge more rulings via the red flag that gets
thrown onto the field. At some point, coaches perhaps would indeed have the
ability to challenge anything and everything, with maybe another challenge
or two to be used per game.
Don’t be surprised if, as an initial step, the coaches have the ability to
challenge personal fouls. Eventually, that could expand to other types of
currently non-reviewable calls.
【在 l*****8 的大作中提到】
: 不懂NCAA,NFL里非judgement的call,比如12-men, ineligible downfield, 球是否被
: tip before PI之类可以review.但PI这种judgement的call从来不允许review的。
:
: personal
: the
: starting
| n***s
发帖数: 10056 | 20 Only foul that is reviewable is targeting foul with ejection. Review will
decide if the ejection should be upheld. If review shows no targetting,
player stays but foul remains. | n***s
发帖数: 10056 | 21 NCAA released video officially confirmed the call for OPI is correct. Watch
it:
http://www.si.com/college-football/2014/10/21/notre-dame-florid |
|
