由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
NewYork版 - Writing F-bomb on your speeding ticket is free speech, judge rules
相关主题
非诚勿扰美国版第几场有WILLIAN FANG??极品用英文怎么说?
Pay Raise for China’s Foxconn WorkersRe: 康粉又有了新说法(换汤不换药) (转载)
GOP Santorum: no more internet porn住在New Jersey, 在NYC上班, 有什么好处呢?
[合集] 求助,吃了speed ticket,在Delmar开庭,请大家推荐个告票专自办公证的心得
Re: 纽约时报卸磨杀驴:开始揭发温家宝的几十亿家产了 (转载)请教一个办委托书的问题
五毛们又要高潮迭起了:如何获取温家宝财产信息 (转载)如何在纽约离婚呢?
do you trust yourself with guns?Are you above the age of 18 and looking for w
屢揭溫家涉弊 紐時在中續被禁 zz有人知道么(有关结婚,marriage officiant,朋友)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: judge话题: speeding话题: writing话题: ticket话题: speech
进入NewYork版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
b**********5
发帖数: 7881
1
Writing F-bomb on your speeding ticket is free speech, judge rules
Writing F-bomb on your speeding ticket is free speech, judge rules
A judge ruled that Willian Barboza (above left) had his free-speech rights
violated after he was arrested for writing profanities on a speeding ticket
A driver was merely exercising his right to free speech when he scrawled “F
— your s—–y town b——s” on a speeding ticket payment form, a federal
judge has ruled.
Willian Barboza, 24, pleaded guilty when he mailed in payment for a speeding
ticket he got in upstate Liberty in 2012, but he crossed out “Liberty”
and wrote in “Tyranny” and also added the obscenities, according to court
papers.
Sullivan County authorities didn’t like that. They rejected his payment and
he was ordered to come in for a court appearance, where they arrested him
for aggravated harassment – though a local judge later dismissed the charge
, his federal lawsuit states.
White Plains federal judge Cathy Seibel said in court Thursday that while
the court clerks who received Barboza’s payment form may have been annoyed,
that doesn’t mean he should have been arrested.
“The words at issue here are not inherently likely to provoke violent
reaction, they were not directed at anyone in particular, and could not be
interpreted as threatening any particular action,” Seibel said, according
to a transcript of the court hearing.
“The words don’t rise to the level of fighting words, and in any event
because they were mailed, they did not suggest imminent action,” the judge
continued.
“For these reasons I do find the defendant’s First Amendment rights were
violated and defendants do not seem to seriously contest that plaintiff
suffered a constitutional violation.”
1 (共1页)
进入NewYork版参与讨论
相关主题
有人知道么(有关结婚,marriage officiant,朋友)Re: 纽约时报卸磨杀驴:开始揭发温家宝的几十亿家产了 (转载)
在纽约市政厅办理结婚登记的流程和费用五毛们又要高潮迭起了:如何获取温家宝财产信息 (转载)
请问在纽约结婚登记要求的出生证明怎么办理?谢谢!do you trust yourself with guns?
resume question -屢揭溫家涉弊 紐時在中續被禁 zz
非诚勿扰美国版第几场有WILLIAN FANG??极品用英文怎么说?
Pay Raise for China’s Foxconn WorkersRe: 康粉又有了新说法(换汤不换药) (转载)
GOP Santorum: no more internet porn住在New Jersey, 在NYC上班, 有什么好处呢?
[合集] 求助,吃了speed ticket,在Delmar开庭,请大家推荐个告票专自办公证的心得
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: judge话题: speeding话题: writing话题: ticket话题: speech