H*********S
发帖数: 22772 | 1 道理来说，科技和资讯越来越发达，观众应该越来越多才是对的，可是这次伦敦还是比
不过4年前的北京，也侧面证明伦敦奥运确实烂 |
N4
发帖数: 155 | 2
【在 H*********S 的大作中提到】
: 道理来说，科技和资讯越来越发达，观众应该越来越多才是对的，可是这次伦敦还是比
: 不过4年前的北京，也侧面证明伦敦奥运确实烂
|
c*****r
发帖数: 2866 | 3 你确信你没有主观臆断地曲解了那则新闻？那只是开幕后14天为止的记录，而且已经接
近北京17天的记录，所以创新记录是肯定的。
我承认北京奥运最好，但没必要为收视率妄自菲薄或沾沾自喜。毕竟电视台是别人控制
和经营的，我们既无法操纵，也捞不到好处，睁一只眼闭一只眼得了。 |
D******e
发帖数: 1222 | 4 First of all, China has 1.3 billion people who will watch Beijing Olympics.
Many fewer audience for London Olympics for sure. That's the advantage for
Beijing.
Also, in US, Opening Ceremony has more audience this time than Beijing
Olympics.
【在 H*********S 的大作中提到】
: 道理来说，科技和资讯越来越发达，观众应该越来越多才是对的，可是这次伦敦还是比
: 不过4年前的北京，也侧面证明伦敦奥运确实烂
|
N4
发帖数: 155 | 5 the Earth has MORE people this time.
.
【在 D******e 的大作中提到】
: First of all, China has 1.3 billion people who will watch Beijing Olympics.
: Many fewer audience for London Olympics for sure. That's the advantage for
: Beijing.
: Also, in US, Opening Ceremony has more audience this time than Beijing
: Olympics.
|
N********d
发帖数: 298 | 6 Mission Impossible 2 had a better box office than Mission Impossible 1. That
's not because MI2 was better - it sucked. That's because MI1 was too good.
.
【在 D******e 的大作中提到】
: First of all, China has 1.3 billion people who will watch Beijing Olympics.
: Many fewer audience for London Olympics for sure. That's the advantage for
: Beijing.
: Also, in US, Opening Ceremony has more audience this time than Beijing
: Olympics.
|
t*****e
发帖数: 3544 | 7 国内24小时连播。 我妈说她一天到晚看，半夜还起来看。 |
e***t
发帖数: 14386 | 8 ...you don't wanna say this argument holds for Athens/Beijing
That
【在 N********d 的大作中提到】
: Mission Impossible 2 had a better box office than Mission Impossible 1. That
: 's not because MI2 was better - it sucked. That's because MI1 was too good.
:
: .
|
