j*****h
发帖数: 2577 | |
a***a
发帖数: 40617 | |
r******g
发帖数: 3849 | 3 都是open source, 本来就是可以copy来copy去的 |
D*******a
发帖数: 3688 | 4 for this particular case, google decompiled oracle(sun)'s code(marked as
CONFIDENTIAL)
【在 r******g 的大作中提到】
: 都是open source, 本来就是可以copy来copy去的
|
a********m
发帖数: 15480 | 5 open source也有版权的。
【在 r******g 的大作中提到】
: 都是open source, 本来就是可以copy来copy去的
|
n*w
发帖数: 3393 | 6 "Folks apparently don't know what is being argued.
Java is supposed to be an open source language. Sun/Oracle however owns the
rights to the interpreter that they distribute. According to the original
Java license, other companies are free to create their own runtime because
all of the Java language is open source. But Sun/Oracle recently changed
their terms on Java such that they made it effectively impossible to create
your own runtime without infringement.
Google argues that they made their project before these changes to the Java
terms and that Oracle is killing the language entirely. I'm on Googles side
here.
Now the fact that they copied Java code would be a case of copyright
infringement still but it wouldn't be relevant to the licensing issue.
Oracle is free to pursue (and hopefully has a good case) a complaint about
copyright infringement and force Google to change their code (and pay a fine
) but this couldn't/shouldn't mean that Google can't create their own
runtime compiler like Oracle is claiming.
Does that make more sense?" |
n*w
发帖数: 3393 | 7 "Ruben Meizoso 9 hours ago in reply to meegouser
@Bernard Bernoulli
You are dead wrong... The heart of the problem is that the mobile JDK was
NEVER open source, since Sun wanted to charge mobile device makers money fro
including Java. Google did not want to pay Sun, so they wrote an
interpreter to compile java programs to their own android format. They
claimed the wrote this compiler in a sandbox (which if true they have no
problem), but as we see today, there was no sandbox and they copied files
directly from Sun along with violating their patents. Google is in SERIOUS
trouble here, if Oracle wanted to they could halt the shipment of android
phones. these are facts whether you like it or not. Open Source does not
mean you can rip off other people stuff, and give it away for free." |
N****w
发帖数: 21578 | 8 改用 meego... no big deal
fro
【在 n*w 的大作中提到】
: "Ruben Meizoso 9 hours ago in reply to meegouser
: @Bernard Bernoulli
: You are dead wrong... The heart of the problem is that the mobile JDK was
: NEVER open source, since Sun wanted to charge mobile device makers money fro
: including Java. Google did not want to pay Sun, so they wrote an
: interpreter to compile java programs to their own android format. They
: claimed the wrote this compiler in a sandbox (which if true they have no
: problem), but as we see today, there was no sandbox and they copied files
: directly from Sun along with violating their patents. Google is in SERIOUS
: trouble here, if Oracle wanted to they could halt the shipment of android
|
d*b
发帖数: 21830 | 9 搞笑，这个code本来就是Sun贴在自己网上供诊断用的。
【在 D*******a 的大作中提到】
: for this particular case, google decompiled oracle(sun)'s code(marked as
: CONFIDENTIAL)
|
