a****a 发帖数: 3905 | 1 那个foreman又接受采访了。
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19425051
"that was being involved in the allegation from Samsung that the patent was
invalid because of the prior art...and it was a very important piece, is
that the stipulation in the law, they had to be interchangeable."
"...I was able to read source code - I showed the jurors that the two
methods in software were not the same, nor could they be interchangeable
because the hardware that was involved between the old processor and the new
processor - you couldn't load the new software methodology in the old
system and expect that it was going to work, and the converse of that was
true."
"And when I got through with that comparison and that test, I asked myself
the question: could I defend this patent, not in the court, could I defend
this patent through that process just like I had to do my own if this were
mine? And that's the "aha" moment that you hear talked about out there." | z****g 发帖数: 2497 | 2 foreman成为本lawsuit中唯一的稳拿。。
was
new
【在 a****a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 那个foreman又接受采访了。 : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19425051 : "that was being involved in the allegation from Samsung that the patent was : invalid because of the prior art...and it was a very important piece, is : that the stipulation in the law, they had to be interchangeable." : "...I was able to read source code - I showed the jurors that the two : methods in software were not the same, nor could they be interchangeable : because the hardware that was involved between the old processor and the new : processor - you couldn't load the new software methodology in the old : system and expect that it was going to work, and the converse of that was
| c****9 发帖数: 5402 | | c*******y 发帖数: 3529 | 4 有三种情况:
1. 结案后被三星收买了
2. 被三星要挟了
3. 确实是脑子有问题
was
new
【在 a****a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 那个foreman又接受采访了。 : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19425051 : "that was being involved in the allegation from Samsung that the patent was : invalid because of the prior art...and it was a very important piece, is : that the stipulation in the law, they had to be interchangeable." : "...I was able to read source code - I showed the jurors that the two : methods in software were not the same, nor could they be interchangeable : because the hardware that was involved between the old processor and the new : processor - you couldn't load the new software methodology in the old : system and expect that it was going to work, and the converse of that was
|
|