C****7
发帖数: 614 | |
C****7
发帖数: 614 | 2 这种过度涂抹，华人会喜欢吧，等于自动磨皮美白了
dxo给那么高分，确实没啥说服力，以前dxo评镜头，有曲线和对比图，还靠谱，现在这
个评测法，不靠谱了 |
s********i
发帖数: 17328 | 3 真不知道手机照相又啥好纠结的？硬件都差不多，就是咔嚓那么一下，小底。
其他的全在后处理。
★ 发自iPhone App: ChinaWeb 1.1.5 |
d*****0
发帖数: 68029 | 4 水军夜景至少打败M43不成问题。即使是APS-C画幅的微单如果配个F3.5-5.6的变焦夜景
可能依然不是水军的对手。
：就是小底的水平，没啥突破
：https://www.dpreview.com/files/p/articles/4858760656/IMG_20190331_185148. |
qr
发帖数: 2016 | 5 这样才对，像dxo那种事先设了一个bar，结果那些厂商只要针对那些bar优化就可以拿
高分，却全然不顾照出来的照片是否整体最优那种测试有什么公信力？
今儿又进去看了看样张，我的评价就一个字，“黄”！尤其是白天拍的绿叶，总是泛着
浓浓的大便黄色，还有绿水也能看上去像粪缸，丑死了！再次证明我前两天贴的照片的
真实性。
：这种过度涂抹，华人会喜欢吧，等于自动磨皮美白了
：dxo给那么高分，确实没啥说服力，以前dxo评镜头，有曲线和对比图，还靠谱，现在
这个评测法，不靠谱了 |
A******r
发帖数: 974 | 6 From your link:
Overall, it's fair to say that in terms of zoom performance Huawei is
currently light years ahead of the smartphone competition, and for me that's
a good enough reason to make the P30 Pro my go-to device for the
foreseeable future — a least until other brands can follow suit and make
similar zoom technologies available in their devices.
That said, it would be unfair to reduce the P30 Pro to its zoom system. It's
a high-end smartphone with an excellent all-around camera that shines
especially in low light (as long as you stick to the primary module). You
can find a wide range of samples across focal lengths and light conditions
in the gallery below. For more information on specs and technologies please
read our original P30 Pro news story and closer-look article.
【在 C****7 的大作中提到】
: 就是小底的水平，没啥突破
: https://www.dpreview.com/files/p/articles/4858760656/IMG_20190331_185148.
: jpeg
: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/huawei-p30-pro-the-new-reference-for-
: smartphone-zoom
|
p*****h
发帖数: 1369 | |
p********1
发帖数: 2785 | |
