R*N
发帖数: 2173 | 1 http://www.falklumo.com/en/k5preview.html
conclusion:
The K-5 has only two rivals which however, can't beat it (except maybe for
very fast action and long lenses): the very similiar Nikon D7000 and the
bulkier and more expensive Canon 7D. If you now consider that only Pentax
managed to pack a good sensor-shift stabilizer into the body which is the
most elegant, sturdy, lightest and smallest of the three and is done by the
smallest company of the three, then the K-5 is an engineering gem and a
ph |
h*******g
发帖数: 10585 | 2 V5
the
's
【在 R*N 的大作中提到】
: http://www.falklumo.com/en/k5preview.html
: conclusion:
: The K-5 has only two rivals which however, can't beat it (except maybe for
: very fast action and long lenses): the very similiar Nikon D7000 and the
: bulkier and more expensive Canon 7D. If you now consider that only Pentax
: managed to pack a good sensor-shift stabilizer into the body which is the
: most elegant, sturdy, lightest and smallest of the three and is done by the
: smallest company of the three, then the K-5 is an engineering gem and a
: ph
|
R***a
发帖数: 41892 | 3 E-5真惨，完全被忽略啊
the
's
【在 R*N 的大作中提到】
: http://www.falklumo.com/en/k5preview.html
: conclusion:
: The K-5 has only two rivals which however, can't beat it (except maybe for
: very fast action and long lenses): the very similiar Nikon D7000 and the
: bulkier and more expensive Canon 7D. If you now consider that only Pentax
: managed to pack a good sensor-shift stabilizer into the body which is the
: most elegant, sturdy, lightest and smallest of the three and is done by the
: smallest company of the three, then the K-5 is an engineering gem and a
: ph
|
S*M
发帖数: 10832 | 4 这人是P+的
这文章就类似跳老说D90是神机一样
the
's
【在 R*N 的大作中提到】
: http://www.falklumo.com/en/k5preview.html
: conclusion:
: The K-5 has only two rivals which however, can't beat it (except maybe for
: very fast action and long lenses): the very similiar Nikon D7000 and the
: bulkier and more expensive Canon 7D. If you now consider that only Pentax
: managed to pack a good sensor-shift stabilizer into the body which is the
: most elegant, sturdy, lightest and smallest of the three and is done by the
: smallest company of the three, then the K-5 is an engineering gem and a
: ph
|
d*****0
发帖数: 68029 | |
h*******g
发帖数: 10585 | 6 不是有个视频的吗？看上去很V5
【在 d*****0 的大作中提到】
: 不知道对焦是否威武？
|
p*******o
发帖数: 3564 | |
i***f
发帖数: 10682 | 8 K5应该不差，除了P的镜头弱一些？似乎品种欠缺，老头居多？
the
's
【在 R*N 的大作中提到】
: http://www.falklumo.com/en/k5preview.html
: conclusion:
: The K-5 has only two rivals which however, can't beat it (except maybe for
: very fast action and long lenses): the very similiar Nikon D7000 and the
: bulkier and more expensive Canon 7D. If you now consider that only Pentax
: managed to pack a good sensor-shift stabilizer into the body which is the
: most elegant, sturdy, lightest and smallest of the three and is done by the
: smallest company of the three, then the K-5 is an engineering gem and a
: ph
|
t**a
发帖数: 4875 | |
h******g
发帖数: 11250 | 10 品种不缺吧，没有超牛的头而已
【在 i***f 的大作中提到】
: K5应该不差，除了P的镜头弱一些？似乎品种欠缺，老头居多？
:
: the
: 's
|
d*****0
发帖数: 68029 | 11 有三公主就够了
【在 h******g 的大作中提到】
: 品种不缺吧，没有超牛的头而已
|
t****e
发帖数: 4821 | 12 P+ 肯定觉得 K-5 里面有点比较变态的东西别家没有，所以也学着玩个高起点看看。
【在 t**a 的大作中提到】
: 就是再好，1600刀也不能买啊。。。：（
|
d*****0
发帖数: 68029 | 13 P+的鸡鸡和镜头都是标价虚高，你可以去dell上面去看看所谓的MSRP是多少，到BH看看
真实售价是多少
【在 t**a 的大作中提到】
: 就是再好，1600刀也不能买啊。。。：（
|
