t*******f
发帖数: 2634 | 1 For people who need fast network storage/streaming,
3500L is highly recommended (just tested):
With dd-wrt, wired-to-wired gigabit NICs, 9 feet CAT5e
cables, through put is 887Mbps!
For wireless, 2.4GHz, with 20MHz single channel, 48Mbps
with 40MHz dual channel, 68Mbps.
The wireless results depends on lots of things, including
distance and neighboring router interferences.
I did not test its USB/NAS/SAMBA/NFS storage performances. | T********r
发帖数: 6210 | | t*******f
发帖数: 2634 | 3 By the way, online info on wired tests showed only ~250Mbps
through put. I am really amazed by the 887Mbps performance
of this router.
【在 t*******f 的大作中提到】
: For people who need fast network storage/streaming,
: 3500L is highly recommended (just tested):
: With dd-wrt, wired-to-wired gigabit NICs, 9 feet CAT5e
: cables, through put is 887Mbps!
: For wireless, 2.4GHz, with 20MHz single channel, 48Mbps
: with 40MHz dual channel, 68Mbps.
: The wireless results depends on lots of things, including
: distance and neighboring router interferences.
: I did not test its USB/NAS/SAMBA/NFS storage performances.
| t*******f
发帖数: 2634 | 4 AMZ ~78Dao
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】
: price?
| t****g
发帖数: 35582 | 5 dual band?
和N16哪个牛？
【在 t*******f 的大作中提到】
: For people who need fast network storage/streaming,
: 3500L is highly recommended (just tested):
: With dd-wrt, wired-to-wired gigabit NICs, 9 feet CAT5e
: cables, through put is 887Mbps!
: For wireless, 2.4GHz, with 20MHz single channel, 48Mbps
: with 40MHz dual channel, 68Mbps.
: The wireless results depends on lots of things, including
: distance and neighboring router interferences.
: I did not test its USB/NAS/SAMBA/NFS storage performances.
| L*****y
发帖数: 4290 | 6 not dual band,that's bad
dual band?
和N16哪个牛？
【在 t****g 的大作中提到】
: dual band?
: 和N16哪个牛？
| t****g
发帖数: 35582 | 7 那RT-N16还便宜些，而且RAM/Flash都多些。
【在 L*****y 的大作中提到】
: not dual band,that's bad
:
: dual band?
: 和N16哪个牛？
| L*****y
发帖数: 4290 | 8 嗯. 这个便宜
那RT-N16还便宜些，而且RAM/Flash都多些。
【在 t****g 的大作中提到】
: 那RT-N16还便宜些，而且RAM/Flash都多些。
| t*******f
发帖数: 2634 | 9 It is 2.4GHz band only, but capable of doing two
2.4GHz channels together to achieve 300Mbps connection
rate.
The Netgear 3700 is dual band, simultaneously, and dual
channel also, so up to 600Mbps.
I did not test N16. It has a faster CPU, so performance should
be similar. However, do not have its giga switch info. 3500L
has a full bandwidth hardware switch (if I remember correctly).
After testing, I recall this piece info, and convinced.
【在 t****g 的大作中提到】
: dual band?
: 和N16哪个牛？
| c*m
发帖数: 1114 | 10 It is outperformed by Asus RT-N16 from some reviews.
【在 t*******f 的大作中提到】
: It is 2.4GHz band only, but capable of doing two
: 2.4GHz channels together to achieve 300Mbps connection
: rate.
: The Netgear 3700 is dual band, simultaneously, and dual
: channel also, so up to 600Mbps.
: I did not test N16. It has a faster CPU, so performance should
: be similar. However, do not have its giga switch info. 3500L
: has a full bandwidth hardware switch (if I remember correctly).
: After testing, I recall this piece info, and convinced.
| t*******f
发帖数: 2634 | 11 Should. I will test it when I have time.
I use N16 as a wireless client for one of my desktops.
For long term hardware stability, I trust Netgear better
from experience. Asus is kind of new to me.
【在 c*m 的大作中提到】
: It is outperformed by Asus RT-N16 from some reviews.
| t*******f
发帖数: 2634 | 12 By the way, I only care if the wireless through put is
higher than my internet speed, which is ~34Mbps. For
faster LAN speed, I drag cables around, and sometimes,
direct cable connections between servers for faster speed
and less cost:) (some of my machine have 2-4 giga NICs)
【在 c*m 的大作中提到】
: It is outperformed by Asus RT-N16 from some reviews.
|
|
