x*******3
发帖数: 8342 | |
L***a
发帖数: 3674 | |
f*******y
发帖数: 2368 | 3 热妈，昨天小包子贴了和你们俩的合影，大家都等着你发包子呢。。。
【在 L***a 的大作中提到】
: hoya
|
x*******3
发帖数: 8342 | 4
看这个排名不是日本那个最好么？
http://www.lenstip.com/115.4-article-
Polarizing_filters_test_Results_and_summary.html
【在 L***a 的大作中提到】
: hoya
|
T********r
发帖数: 6210 | |
z****6
发帖数: 10776 | |
Y****0
发帖数: 91 | 7 我说怎么在他家找不到hoya的filter了，哎
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】
: 2filter好象推荐第三个牌子，他家和Hoya闹翻了。
|
T********r
发帖数: 6210 | 8 一直不明白B+W Kaesemann和B+W MRC有什么区别？
【在 z****6 的大作中提到】
: Heliopan Kaeseman
|
z****6
发帖数: 10776 | 9 Optically they should be identical, but the KSM versions are sealed around the edges of the polarizing film and are therefore built better and supposed to last longer.
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】
: 一直不明白B+W Kaesemann和B+W MRC有什么区别？
|
x*******3
发帖数: 8342 | 10
around the edges of the polarizing film and are therefore built better and
supposed to last longer.
compare to marumi, what is the difference?
Thanks!
【在 z****6 的大作中提到】
: Optically they should be identical, but the KSM versions are sealed around the edges of the polarizing film and are therefore built better and supposed to last longer.
|
|
|
d*****0
发帖数: 68029 | 11 如果是超薄的话，P+的可以盖镜头盖，B+W的不能盖 |
x*******3
发帖数: 8342 | 12
M+的呢？
【在 d*****0 的大作中提到】
: 如果是超薄的话，P+的可以盖镜头盖，B+W的不能盖
|
S*******a
发帖数: 75 | 13 那这个呢 XS-Pro Digital MRC Nano Kaeseman，有什么优点么？看价格和ksm还有mrc
差不多，好像是新出的，以前没
听说过
the edges of the polarizing film
and are therefore built better and supposed to last longer.
【在 z****6 的大作中提到】
: Optically they should be identical, but the KSM versions are sealed around the edges of the polarizing film and are therefore built better and supposed to last longer.
|
T********r
发帖数: 6210 | 14 xs-pro是extra slim，但是又有fron thread，可以盖镜头盖。
mrc
【在 S*******a 的大作中提到】
: 那这个呢 XS-Pro Digital MRC Nano Kaeseman，有什么优点么？看价格和ksm还有mrc
: 差不多，好像是新出的，以前没
: 听说过
:
: the edges of the polarizing film
: and are therefore built better and supposed to last longer.
|
L***a
发帖数: 3674 | 15 -。-#
那只是alpaka
不是llama or 神马
【在 f*******y 的大作中提到】
: 热妈，昨天小包子贴了和你们俩的合影，大家都等着你发包子呢。。。
|
x*******3
发帖数: 8342 | |
f*******y
发帖数: 2368 | 17 失敬失敬，我看着很像，以为是一样的呢。。。
【在 L***a 的大作中提到】
: -。-#
: 那只是alpaka
: 不是llama or 神马
|
x5
发帖数: 27871 | 18 googled
" A Kaesmann type has the foil stretched and held under constant tension in
all directions. To do this it is
necessary to totally edge seal the filter in glass rather than just bind the
glasses and foil with an adhesive.
This type of polarizer is available in linear, circular and in warmtone
types.
Its advantages are that the polarizing effect is slightly greater, the
filter is "tropicalized" so it is immune to
moisture, fungus, etc and it is very, very flat. So it will not adversely
effect the sharpness of longer lenses. "
the edges of the polarizing film
and are therefore built better and supposed to last longer.
【在 z****6 的大作中提到】
: Optically they should be identical, but the KSM versions are sealed around the edges of the polarizing film and are therefore built better and supposed to last longer.
|
