G****1 发帖数: 6908 | 1 判决有啥关系没有?
版主:这有点跑题,不合适就删了 |
g**********g 发帖数: 18118 | 2 没有
【在 G****1 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 判决有啥关系没有? : 版主:这有点跑题,不合适就删了
|
G****1 发帖数: 6908 | 3 为什么我觉得高法的含糊判决结果有鼓励SCA5之类立法的嫌疑
【在 g**********g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 没有
|
g**********g 发帖数: 18118 | 4 这届高法尼玛左派太多。非常不好。尼玛不如美帝直接共产主义的了
【在 G****1 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 为什么我觉得高法的含糊判决结果有鼓励SCA5之类立法的嫌疑
|
p**m 发帖数: 3876 | 5 9个法官,4个克林顿/奥巴马任命,5个里根/老布什/小布什任命,投票结果7:1,自己
看吧
【在 g**********g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这届高法尼玛左派太多。非常不好。尼玛不如美帝直接共产主义的了
|
p**m 发帖数: 3876 | 6 左派真的多,Shitizens United vs FEC 就不会那么判了
【在 g**********g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这届高法尼玛左派太多。非常不好。尼玛不如美帝直接共产主义的了
|
w**7 发帖数: 5258 | 7 7:1 的决定是发回下级法庭重审。
n a 7–1 decision, the Court vacated and remanded the Fifth Circuit's ruling
. Writing for the majority, Justice Kennedy concluded that the Fifth Circuit
failed to apply strict scrutiny in its decision affirming the admissions
policy. Instead, he wrote, the Fifth Circuit held that Fisher could only
challenge "whether the University's decision to use race as an admissions
factor 'was made in good faith.' It presumed that the school had acted in
good faith and gave petitioner the burden of rebutting that presumption."[20
] Kennedy argued that per the Grutter v. Bollinger ruling, the burden of
evidence primarily lies with the university "to prove that its admissions
program is narrowly tailored to obtain the educational benefits of diversity。
【在 p**m 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 左派真的多,Shitizens United vs FEC 就不会那么判了
|
g**********g 发帖数: 18118 | 8 哈哈就怕土匪认真
ruling
Circuit
20
【在 w**7 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 7:1 的决定是发回下级法庭重审。 : n a 7–1 decision, the Court vacated and remanded the Fifth Circuit's ruling : . Writing for the majority, Justice Kennedy concluded that the Fifth Circuit : failed to apply strict scrutiny in its decision affirming the admissions : policy. Instead, he wrote, the Fifth Circuit held that Fisher could only : challenge "whether the University's decision to use race as an admissions : factor 'was made in good faith.' It presumed that the school had acted in : good faith and gave petitioner the burden of rebutting that presumption."[20 : ] Kennedy argued that per the Grutter v. Bollinger ruling, the burden of : evidence primarily lies with the university "to prove that its admissions
|