e**n
发帖数: 5876 | 1 cameralabs做的P+42.5f1.7评测, 45f1.8被拉出来陪练. 结果就悲剧了...
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_G_42-5mm_f1-7
中心是42.5f1.7略好, 这个结果和其他review差不多,
42.5f1.7@ f1.7
45f1.8 @ f1.8
奇葩的是边缘:
42.5f1.7@ f1.7
45f1.8 @ f1.8 | d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 2 最后那张绝对说明评测者是个奥黑
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: cameralabs做的P+42.5f1.7评测, 45f1.8被拉出来陪练. 结果就悲剧了...
: http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_G_42-5mm_f1-7
: 中心是42.5f1.7略好, 这个结果和其他review差不多,
: 42.5f1.7@ f1.7
: 45f1.8 @ f1.8
: 奇葩的是边缘:
: 42.5f1.7@ f1.7
: 45f1.8 @ f1.8
| e**n
发帖数: 5876 | 3 明显cameralabs的这个copy有问题, 太不负责了
【在 d******a 的大作中提到】
: 最后那张绝对说明评测者是个奥黑
| e**n
发帖数: 5876 | 4 在dpr论坛上逛了逛, 看见这个测试的讨论, 里面说Gordon(做cameralab测试的)解释了
45f1.8 bad copy的疑问, 就是他试了几个copy. 都差不多.
"At this point the members of some forums weigh-in and claim I have a poor
copy of the Olympus lens. I've actually tested several copies of the Olympus
45mm f1.8 and all have performed similarly. I find it a great lens that's
sharp in the middle when wide-open, and sharp across most of the frame if
you close it down to f4-5.6. It's just that it's being compared here against
a lens that simply delivers better results in the corners at larger
apertures."
用45f1.8的童鞋们, 卖了换42.5吧. 呵呵 |
|
