|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e**n
发帖数: 5876 | 1 ePhotozine published the interview with Olympus Imaging Global Marketing
Manager Toshiyuki Terada.
”On Dynamic range, we have compared the dynamic range to the competition,
and the E-M1 Mark II at ISO200 gives 4.2 steps, which is better than the E-
M1, (3.8steps), and APS-C cameras such as the Canon EOS 7D Mark II (3.5
steps), and Fujifilm X-T1 (3.5steps).”
4.2 steps = 13.96 stops in DR. 对比: A6000(13.1), A6300(13.7), NX500(13.9,
best of Samsung, better than NX1) | T****i
发帖数: 15191 | 2 难以置信。O+怎么做到的？
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: ePhotozine published the interview with Olympus Imaging Global Marketing
: Manager Toshiyuki Terada.
: ”On Dynamic range, we have compared the dynamic range to the competition,
: and the E-M1 Mark II at ISO200 gives 4.2 steps, which is better than the E-
: M1, (3.8steps), and APS-C cameras such as the Canon EOS 7D Mark II (3.5
: steps), and Fujifilm X-T1 (3.5steps).”
: 4.2 steps = 13.96 stops in DR. 对比: A6000(13.1), A6300(13.7), NX500(13.9,
: best of Samsung, better than NX1)
| j******o
发帖数: 145 | 3 X-t1 is too old.
How about X-T2? | e**n
发帖数: 5876 | 4 assume X-T2 has the same DR as A6300(13.7), EM1 II (13.96) is still slightly
better.
【在 j******o 的大作中提到】
: X-t1 is too old.
: How about X-T2?
| e**n
发帖数: 5876 | 5 interview全文
https://www.ephotozine.com/article/olympus-q-a--olympus-om-d-e-m1-sensor-
size-trip-29987
高感也比EM1好一档
there is a 1 stop noise performance improvement over the E-M1
【在 T****i 的大作中提到】
: 难以置信。O+怎么做到的？
| b*****s
发帖数: 3390 | 6 按照这个新闻的说法，E-M1就已经把X-T1秒了，这两个都是老机器了，网上评测一堆一
堆的
至于为什么EM1这么牛逼，你可以看下图，EM1 II的把戏也是大概如此，不服不行
https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-A6000-versus-
Olympus-OM-D-E-M1-versus-Nikon-D7000___942_909_680
点击measurement看dynamic range曲线测试
可以看到EM1 标定ISO 200，实测ISO 122 DR=12.7 evs
A6000标定ISO 200，实测ISO 160 DR=12.44evs
D7000标定ISO 200，实测ISO 167 DR=12.91evs
XT1因为xtrans的缘故，dxomark没有测过任何一台机器，当然富士也是虚标ISO比较厉
害的，XT1的CMOS实际就是索尼的这块16M CMOS外加xtrans彩色滤镜，跟D7000的CMOS本
质是一样（当然nikon的dr一直比较牛超过其他家）
EM1 II吹这么牛，起步ISO还是200，除了跟以往一样虚标ISO（也就是说作弊了），没
有任何可能性击败除佳能以外的同时代aps机器
【在 T****i 的大作中提到】
: 难以置信。O+怎么做到的？
| d******d
发帖数: 2210 | 7 too good to be true
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】
: ePhotozine published the interview with Olympus Imaging Global Marketing
: Manager Toshiyuki Terada.
: ”On Dynamic range, we have compared the dynamic range to the competition,
: and the E-M1 Mark II at ISO200 gives 4.2 steps, which is better than the E-
: M1, (3.8steps), and APS-C cameras such as the Canon EOS 7D Mark II (3.5
: steps), and Fujifilm X-T1 (3.5steps).”
: 4.2 steps = 13.96 stops in DR. 对比: A6000(13.1), A6300(13.7), NX500(13.9,
: best of Samsung, better than NX1)
| d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 8 还行，动态范围能比肩销量最大的APSC品牌（佳能），就是很不错了
【在 b*****s 的大作中提到】
: 按照这个新闻的说法，E-M1就已经把X-T1秒了，这两个都是老机器了，网上评测一堆一
: 堆的
: 至于为什么EM1这么牛逼，你可以看下图，EM1 II的把戏也是大概如此，不服不行
: https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-A6000-versus-
: Olympus-OM-D-E-M1-versus-Nikon-D7000___942_909_680
: 点击measurement看dynamic range曲线测试
: 可以看到EM1 标定ISO 200，实测ISO 122 DR=12.7 evs
: A6000标定ISO 200，实测ISO 160 DR=12.44evs
: D7000标定ISO 200，实测ISO 167 DR=12.91evs
: XT1因为xtrans的缘故，dxomark没有测过任何一台机器，当然富士也是虚标ISO比较厉
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
