s********5
发帖数: 15 | 1 大家给点意见？有appeal过的吗？
顺便附上审稿意见，以及我们反驳后编辑的意见
文章在 http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4280
====
In this article, the authors "re-derive" first-order Fermi's Golden
Rule with resonances. While they even comment very briefly on the
fact, that there are cases where "the non-smoothness effect has been
ob- served previously in the model of a single two-level atom
interacting with a one-dimensional optical cavity," they take the
smooth case (i.e., no resonances) as the default and try to sell the
case where the transition probability between two levels is not very
smooth with a change of energy. I think this has been done in various
forms thousands of times, and does not need a new paper.
In the case that I missed something really important, I am of course
willing to take this into account. But in this case it has to be made
really clear, already in abstract and introduction why this paper
needs to be published. Some calculations involving Fourier transforms
of functions involving the sinc function are definitely not
sufficient.
I would not recommend this article for publication.
===============
Dear Dr. Zhang,
You have asked for reconsideration on the grounds that the referee has
misunderstood the intent of your paper as simply one of rederiving
Fermi's Golden Rule. However, the report states explicitly "... they
take the smooth case (i.e., no resonances) as the default and try to
sell the case where the transition probability between two levels is
not very smooth with a change of energy. I think this has been done in
various forms thousands of times, and does not need a new paper." The
Editors agree that deviations from Fermi's Golden Rule have been
discussed in many previous papers.
Your paper has been rejected. Further consideration can only be given
if you decide to exercise the option, available under this journal's
Editorial Policies (copy attached), of appealing the decision to
reject the manuscript. Adjudication of such an appeal is based on the
version of the manuscript that was rejected; no revisions can be
introduced at this stage.
Yours sincerely,
Gordon W.F. Drake
Editor
Physical Review A
Email: [email protected]
(function(){try{var s,a,i,j,r,c,l,b=document.getElementsByTagName("script");l=b[b.length-1].previousSibling;a=l.getAttribute('data-cfemail');if(a){s='';r=parseInt(a.substr(0,2),16);for(j=2;a.length-j;j+=2){c=parseInt(a.substr(j,2),16)^r;s+=String.fromCharCode(c);}s=document.createTextNode(s);l.parentNode.replaceChild(s,l);}}catch(e){}})();
/* ]]> */
http://journals.aps.org/pra/ | t****a
发帖数: 3544 | | q*d
发帖数: 22178 | 3 Drake是氦谱理论计算里最大的专家。。。
换个杂志投吧
(function(){try{var s,a,i,j,r,c,l,b=document.getElementsByTagName("script");l=b[b.length-1].previousSibling;a=l.getAttribute('data-cfemail');if(a){s='';r=parseInt(a.substr(0,2),16);for(j=2;a.length-j;j+=2){c=parseInt(a.substr(j,2),16)^r;s+=String.fromCharCode(c);}s=document.createTextNode(s);l.parentNode.replaceChild(s,l);}}catch(e){}})();
/* ]]> */
【在 s********5 的大作中提到】
: 大家给点意见？有appeal过的吗？
:
: 顺便附上审稿意见，以及我们反驳后编辑的意见
:
: 文章在 http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4280
:
: ====
: In this article, the authors "re-derive" first-order Fermi's Golden
: Rule with resonances. While they even comment very briefly on the
: fact, that there are cases where "the non-smoothness effect has been
| d*********6
发帖数: 1972 | 4 署名Rihanna试试
【在 q*d 的大作中提到】
: Drake是氦谱理论计算里最大的专家。。。
: 换个杂志投吧
:
: (function(){try{var s,a,i,j,r,c,l,b=document.getElementsByTagName("script");l=b[b.length-1].previousSibling;a=l.getAttribute('data-cfemail');if(a){s='';r=parseInt(a.substr(0,2),16);for(j=2;a.length-j;j+=2){c=parseInt(a.substr(j,2),16)^r;s+=String.fromCharCode(c);}s=document.createTextNode(s);l.parentNode.replaceChild(s,l);}}catch(e){}})();
: /* ]]> */
|
|
