p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 1 投PRL第三次碰到这种情况了。。。。。。,之前的两篇,一次成功,一次失败,希望这
次好运吧。
很想统计下大伙遇到这种情况最后的结果是怎么样的。
Dear Dr. Y,
We have received two referee reports on the manuscript above
which give conflicting recommendations in regard to publication
in Physical Review Letters. We have decided to get further
advice from a third referee. We regret this delay in the review
process. No action is required of you at this time.
Yours sincerely,
D |
H*****8 发帖数: 175 | |
h********0 发帖数: 12056 | |
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 4 冤枉啊。比较害怕,上来求教大家的。
【在 H*****8 的大作中提到】 : 别显摆了,我最近投了3次没有一个正面意见
|
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 5 但愿碰到nice的,讲理的审稿人。
【在 h********0 的大作中提到】 : 50/50 吧。说明编辑还是想发。
|
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 6 有始有终,上来更新一下:
第一轮审稿的report收到了,一共三个意见
Referee A: "To conclude, I believe that this paper can be published in
Physical Review Letters in its present form."
Referee B:"With no doubt, the results presented in the manuscript deserve
publication. But in the referee's opinion, the manuscript, possibly after
some extension, would be more suitable for Physical Review B than Physical
Review Letters. The manuscript includes many calculation details, which
makes it interesting rather for a narrow group of experts than to a broad
community."
Referee C:"I support the recommendation of Referee B to extend the paper and
transfer it to Physical Review B."
在犹豫是不是要马上转投PRB,大伙给个意见呗。泪奔。
【在 p*********2 的大作中提到】 : 投PRL第三次碰到这种情况了。。。。。。,之前的两篇,一次成功,一次失败,希望这 : 次好运吧。 : 很想统计下大伙遇到这种情况最后的结果是怎么样的。 : Dear Dr. Y, : We have received two referee reports on the manuscript above : which give conflicting recommendations in regard to publication : in Physical Review Letters. We have decided to get further : advice from a third referee. We regret this delay in the review : process. No action is required of you at this time. : Yours sincerely,
|
m**n 发帖数: 9010 | 7 当然要fight一下.
比如, 把"many calculation details"放在supplement materials,
在文章中增加一些更general, 更物理的东西(也就是增加些废话).
【在 p*********2 的大作中提到】 : 有始有终,上来更新一下: : 第一轮审稿的report收到了,一共三个意见 : Referee A: "To conclude, I believe that this paper can be published in : Physical Review Letters in its present form." : Referee B:"With no doubt, the results presented in the manuscript deserve : publication. But in the referee's opinion, the manuscript, possibly after : some extension, would be more suitable for Physical Review B than Physical : Review Letters. The manuscript includes many calculation details, which : makes it interesting rather for a narrow group of experts than to a broad : community."
|
m**o 发帖数: 9805 | 8 不是说最近PRL把general interests从评审标准里拿掉了?LOL
这种应该还可以fight,不过要看你老板分量了
【在 p*********2 的大作中提到】 : 有始有终,上来更新一下: : 第一轮审稿的report收到了,一共三个意见 : Referee A: "To conclude, I believe that this paper can be published in : Physical Review Letters in its present form." : Referee B:"With no doubt, the results presented in the manuscript deserve : publication. But in the referee's opinion, the manuscript, possibly after : some extension, would be more suitable for Physical Review B than Physical : Review Letters. The manuscript includes many calculation details, which : makes it interesting rather for a narrow group of experts than to a broad : community."
|
c**e 发帖数: 4439 | 9 好文章放到哪都会很有价值,不好的文章想通过好杂志来提升文章的质量也是不可能的
,只能忽悠功利的人,淡定点吧 |
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 10 试试,谢谢你的建议。
【在 m**n 的大作中提到】 : 当然要fight一下. : 比如, 把"many calculation details"放在supplement materials, : 在文章中增加一些更general, 更物理的东西(也就是增加些废话).
|
|
|
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 11 这个我也看到了,刚刚五月一号PRL主编的文章,也在考虑是不是该从这个点rebuttal.
【在 m**o 的大作中提到】 : 不是说最近PRL把general interests从评审标准里拿掉了?LOL : 这种应该还可以fight,不过要看你老板分量了
|
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 12 原则上完全同意你的观点,但是现在是技术上的问题,从他们第一轮的Report来看,都
毫不犹豫的支持发表(这能够表明是好文章了),但是那两个拒绝在PRL上的理由比较
牵强,也许有其他比较复杂的因素在里面,我也不能过多猜测。
【在 c**e 的大作中提到】 : 好文章放到哪都会很有价值,不好的文章想通过好杂志来提升文章的质量也是不可能的 : ,只能忽悠功利的人,淡定点吧
|
T**T 发帖数: 1439 | 13 PRL的审稿方向应该变变了,虽然大方向有点没落,但IF一直跌也不是办法 |
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 14 投PRL第三次碰到这种情况了。。。。。。,之前的两篇,一次成功,一次失败,希望这
次好运吧。
很想统计下大伙遇到这种情况最后的结果是怎么样的。
Dear Dr. Y,
We have received two referee reports on the manuscript above
which give conflicting recommendations in regard to publication
in Physical Review Letters. We have decided to get further
advice from a third referee. We regret this delay in the review
process. No action is required of you at this time.
Yours sincerely,
D |
H*****8 发帖数: 175 | |
h********0 发帖数: 12056 | |
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 17 冤枉啊。比较害怕,上来求教大家的。
【在 H*****8 的大作中提到】 : 别显摆了,我最近投了3次没有一个正面意见
|
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 18 但愿碰到nice的,讲理的审稿人。
【在 h********0 的大作中提到】 : 50/50 吧。说明编辑还是想发。
|
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 19 有始有终,上来更新一下:
第一轮审稿的report收到了,一共三个意见
Referee A: "To conclude, I believe that this paper can be published in
Physical Review Letters in its present form."
Referee B:"With no doubt, the results presented in the manuscript deserve
publication. But in the referee's opinion, the manuscript, possibly after
some extension, would be more suitable for Physical Review B than Physical
Review Letters. The manuscript includes many calculation details, which
makes it interesting rather for a narrow group of experts than to a broad
community."
Referee C:"I support the recommendation of Referee B to extend the paper and
transfer it to Physical Review B."
在犹豫是不是要马上转投PRB,大伙给个意见呗。泪奔。
【在 p*********2 的大作中提到】 : 投PRL第三次碰到这种情况了。。。。。。,之前的两篇,一次成功,一次失败,希望这 : 次好运吧。 : 很想统计下大伙遇到这种情况最后的结果是怎么样的。 : Dear Dr. Y, : We have received two referee reports on the manuscript above : which give conflicting recommendations in regard to publication : in Physical Review Letters. We have decided to get further : advice from a third referee. We regret this delay in the review : process. No action is required of you at this time. : Yours sincerely,
|
m**n 发帖数: 9010 | 20 当然要fight一下.
比如, 把"many calculation details"放在supplement materials,
在文章中增加一些更general, 更物理的东西(也就是增加些废话).
【在 p*********2 的大作中提到】 : 有始有终,上来更新一下: : 第一轮审稿的report收到了,一共三个意见 : Referee A: "To conclude, I believe that this paper can be published in : Physical Review Letters in its present form." : Referee B:"With no doubt, the results presented in the manuscript deserve : publication. But in the referee's opinion, the manuscript, possibly after : some extension, would be more suitable for Physical Review B than Physical : Review Letters. The manuscript includes many calculation details, which : makes it interesting rather for a narrow group of experts than to a broad : community."
|
|
|
m**o 发帖数: 9805 | 21 不是说最近PRL把general interests从评审标准里拿掉了?LOL
这种应该还可以fight,不过要看你老板分量了
【在 p*********2 的大作中提到】 : 有始有终,上来更新一下: : 第一轮审稿的report收到了,一共三个意见 : Referee A: "To conclude, I believe that this paper can be published in : Physical Review Letters in its present form." : Referee B:"With no doubt, the results presented in the manuscript deserve : publication. But in the referee's opinion, the manuscript, possibly after : some extension, would be more suitable for Physical Review B than Physical : Review Letters. The manuscript includes many calculation details, which : makes it interesting rather for a narrow group of experts than to a broad : community."
|
c**e 发帖数: 4439 | 22 好文章放到哪都会很有价值,不好的文章想通过好杂志来提升文章的质量也是不可能的
,只能忽悠功利的人,淡定点吧 |
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 23 试试,谢谢你的建议。
【在 m**n 的大作中提到】 : 当然要fight一下. : 比如, 把"many calculation details"放在supplement materials, : 在文章中增加一些更general, 更物理的东西(也就是增加些废话).
|
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 24 这个我也看到了,刚刚五月一号PRL主编的文章,也在考虑是不是该从这个点rebuttal.
【在 m**o 的大作中提到】 : 不是说最近PRL把general interests从评审标准里拿掉了?LOL : 这种应该还可以fight,不过要看你老板分量了
|
p*********2 发帖数: 31 | 25 原则上完全同意你的观点,但是现在是技术上的问题,从他们第一轮的Report来看,都
毫不犹豫的支持发表(这能够表明是好文章了),但是那两个拒绝在PRL上的理由比较
牵强,也许有其他比较复杂的因素在里面,我也不能过多猜测。
【在 c**e 的大作中提到】 : 好文章放到哪都会很有价值,不好的文章想通过好杂志来提升文章的质量也是不可能的 : ,只能忽悠功利的人,淡定点吧
|
T**T 发帖数: 1439 | 26 PRL的审稿方向应该变变了,虽然大方向有点没落,但IF一直跌也不是办法 |
t******s 发帖数: 48 | 27 楼主,这篇prl主编的文章有链接吗?能发下吗?
我最近一篇prl文章,三个评审,两个完全支持发表,一个拿general interest说事,
主编把文章发给了DAE...
这个我也看到了,刚刚五月一号PRL主编的文章,也在考虑是不是该从这个点rebuttal.
【在 p*********2 的大作中提到】 : 这个我也看到了,刚刚五月一号PRL主编的文章,也在考虑是不是该从这个点rebuttal.
|
b******u 发帖数: 226 | 28 如果是5月1号,应该是这个
http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.17
rebuttal.
【在 t******s 的大作中提到】 : 楼主,这篇prl主编的文章有链接吗?能发下吗? : 我最近一篇prl文章,三个评审,两个完全支持发表,一个拿general interest说事, : 主编把文章发给了DAE... : : 这个我也看到了,刚刚五月一号PRL主编的文章,也在考虑是不是该从这个点rebuttal.
|