c********y
发帖数: 98 | 1 Since I’ve written about Rawls, I feel like I need to write about Nozick as
well. A usual caveat: I only read a tiny part of Nozick and libertarianism.
Also, people should not be surprised if there are internal contradictions
within or between the two posts. :) | k***g
发帖数: 7244 | 2 顶一下：）
【在 c********y 的大作中提到】
: Since I’ve written about Rawls, I feel like I need to write about Nozick as
: well. A usual caveat: I only read a tiny part of Nozick and libertarianism.
: Also, people should not be surprised if there are internal contradictions
: within or between the two posts. :)
| c*******s
发帖数: 163 | 3 Nice post. You shoud probably take a look at "Civilization and its
Discontents" by Sigmund Freud, in which he explains the dilemma between
human's self interests and the collective interests for the community. It is
not a easy read though, but if you can get through Rawls's "A Theory of
Justice" without falling into sleep, you can handle this :)
BTW, are you doing Political Theory as your major?
not
that
mankind
the
body,
their
of
contra
their
choices
parts.
Locke
【在 c********y 的大作中提到】
: Since I’ve written about Rawls, I feel like I need to write about Nozick as
: well. A usual caveat: I only read a tiny part of Nozick and libertarianism.
: Also, people should not be surprised if there are internal contradictions
: within or between the two posts. :)
| c********y
发帖数: 98 | 4 thanks for the suggestion. I found Rawls pretty engaging and didn't fall asleep.
So maybe I'll try to take a look at Freud. No, political theory is not my field.
Are you a political theorist or economist?
【在 c*******s 的大作中提到】
: Nice post. You shoud probably take a look at "Civilization and its
: Discontents" by Sigmund Freud, in which he explains the dilemma between
: human's self interests and the collective interests for the community. It is
: not a easy read though, but if you can get through Rawls's "A Theory of
: Justice" without falling into sleep, you can handle this :)
: BTW, are you doing Political Theory as your major?
:
: not
: that
: mankind
| c*******s
发帖数: 163 | 5 Well, my "A theory to Justice" is still sitting on my bookshelf, as I don't
have time to read a single word, maybe I could find some time this winter
break. That said, if I were a political theorist, I would have read it inside
out :) Nor am I an economist. My interest, however, is political economy, not
in the sense of game theory or rational choice thouth. What about you? CP? IR?
MD?
asleep.
field.
is
Nozick as
libertarianism.
contradictions
simply
social
outcome”
and
forgets
When
it
the
libe
【在 c********y 的大作中提到】
: thanks for the suggestion. I found Rawls pretty engaging and didn't fall asleep.
: So maybe I'll try to take a look at Freud. No, political theory is not my field.
: Are you a political theorist or economist?
| c********y
发帖数: 98 | 6 Officially I'm in CP and methods. I still need to sort out what I really want to do,
but I'd like to say I'm interested in political economy too. So really nice to
meet you here. Since I'm not particularly good at statistics, I'll probably do
something game-theoretic. At the same time, I don't mind doing Chinese politics, if I can find
a good topic and be able to use game theory on it. And you? Are you working on any specific
project? or, put the question differently, what stage are you in your
【在 c*******s 的大作中提到】
: Well, my "A theory to Justice" is still sitting on my bookshelf, as I don't
: have time to read a single word, maybe I could find some time this winter
: break. That said, if I were a political theorist, I would have read it inside
: out :) Nor am I an economist. My interest, however, is political economy, not
: in the sense of game theory or rational choice thouth. What about you? CP? IR?
: MD?
:
: asleep.
: field.
: is
|
|
