k****h
发帖数: 944 | 1 来问一道题，什么因素导致” central control, or decentralized control” 下的政
策选择或执行有不同？ 如各州的 Medicaid, Medicare的政策或执行有不同 （medicare
是全美统一政策，联邦funding的，medicaid是联邦和州政府共同funding的）。除了prin
cipal-agent theory外，还有其他原理可用来分析马？
ANY INPUT WILL BE APPRECIATED.THX | k***g
发帖数: 7244 | 2 是仅限于美国的？还是比较政治的？
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 来问一道题，什么因素导致” central control, or decentralized control” 下的政
: 策选择或执行有不同？ 如各州的 Medicaid, Medicare的政策或执行有不同 （medicare
: 是全美统一政策，联邦funding的，medicaid是联邦和州政府共同funding的）。除了prin
: cipal-agent theory外，还有其他原理可用来分析马？
: ANY INPUT WILL BE APPRECIATED.THX
| k****h
发帖数: 944 | 3
下
了
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 来问一道题，什么因素导致” central control, or decentralized control” 下的政
: 策选择或执行有不同？ 如各州的 Medicaid, Medicare的政策或执行有不同 （medicare
: 是全美统一政策，联邦funding的，medicaid是联邦和州政府共同funding的）。除了prin
: cipal-agent theory外，还有其他原理可用来分析马？
: ANY INPUT WILL BE APPRECIATED.THX
| k***g
发帖数: 7244 | 4 比较政治里，如complexity上面的帖子说的，有很多关于federalism/decentraliz
ation的文章，其中不少是把centralization/decentralization 作为 dependent
variable来研究的，提出了很多相关的independent variable，可以在Jstor上搜索
一下：）
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
:
: 下
: 了
| c*******s
发帖数: 163 | 5 Regarding the benefits of federalism, one interesting thought is the "Tiebout
Hypothesis", suggesting that competitions among jurisdictions benefit
consumers in terms of public goods provision. This hypothesis simply follows
the logic of neo-classical economic theory, just substituting firms with
sub-national governments. Likewise, there are many assumptions need to be
satisfied.
Here is the reference:
Tiebout, C. (1956) "A Pure Theory of Local Government Expenditure." Journal of
Political Econo
【在 k***g 的大作中提到】
: 比较政治里，如complexity上面的帖子说的，有很多关于federalism/decentraliz
: ation的文章，其中不少是把centralization/decentralization 作为 dependent
: variable来研究的，提出了很多相关的independent variable，可以在Jstor上搜索
: 一下：）
| k****h
发帖数: 944 | 6 Thanks for yoour information. It is very helpful.
Yah, in the field of welfare or health, a specific phenomenon resulted from
the "Tiebout Hypothesis" is the so-called " welfare magnet", which
suggests that people may "vote with their feet" in response to varied
welfare or health polcies of different states.
"Tiebout
of
【在 c*******s 的大作中提到】
: Regarding the benefits of federalism, one interesting thought is the "Tiebout
: Hypothesis", suggesting that competitions among jurisdictions benefit
: consumers in terms of public goods provision. This hypothesis simply follows
: the logic of neo-classical economic theory, just substituting firms with
: sub-national governments. Likewise, there are many assumptions need to be
: satisfied.
: Here is the reference:
: Tiebout, C. (1956) "A Pure Theory of Local Government Expenditure." Journal of
: Political Econo
| k****h
发帖数: 944 | 7
But I am not sure whether the hypothsis can be applied to answer the question.
For Medicare problem, federal government in fact tries to make a same rule for
the whole nation, although there is some options that states can choose. For
Medicaid, it may work, since it is a program operated by state gov.
follows
Journal
索
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: Thanks for yoour information. It is very helpful.
: Yah, in the field of welfare or health, a specific phenomenon resulted from
: the "Tiebout Hypothesis" is the so-called " welfare magnet", which
: suggests that people may "vote with their feet" in response to varied
: welfare or health polcies of different states.
:
: "Tiebout
: of
| c*******s
发帖数: 163 | 8 question.
for
It may not answer the questions directly. However, it appears to me that there
are mainly two factors contributing to the policy-difference between
centralized and decentralized policy-making.
1. The process of decision-making, e.g., information gathering, the ability to
make the right decision, the difficulties of passing the bill. etc.
2. Implementation, e.g., is it efficient to carry out the policy at the local
level? What is the administrative cost at the local level vs. federa | x****x
发帖数: 87 | 9 晕，委托人代理人机制啊，好像是经济学里面的激励理论吧。看来政治学和经济学好像
没有社么差别了，哈哈，我喜欢，我想转到政治学，
我觉得有这个委托代理理论分析很好啊，一定可以找到某些条件，分别在社么条件下，
联邦制度是均衡，在社么条件下，非联邦是均衡解，^_^
政
medicare
prin
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 来问一道题，什么因素导致” central control, or decentralized control” 下的政
: 策选择或执行有不同？ 如各州的 Medicaid, Medicare的政策或执行有不同 （medicare
: 是全美统一政策，联邦funding的，medicaid是联邦和州政府共同funding的）。除了prin
: cipal-agent theory外，还有其他原理可用来分析马？
: ANY INPUT WILL BE APPRECIATED.THX
|
|
