h*i
发帖数: 3446 | |
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | |
S*A
发帖数: 7142 | 3 看了，臭长。这个人觉得自己很吊。
对于 C 的优点分析以及汇编的接近很赞同。
但是根本没有说明为什么 clojure 是新的 C。
就是可以运行时候自己修改自己代码？
论据非常弱。
Clojure 绝对没有可能接近 C 的地位。 |
l*********s
发帖数: 5409 | 4 It is an analogy, since clojure is easy to learn and use, just like C.
【在 S*A 的大作中提到】
: 看了，臭长。这个人觉得自己很吊。
: 对于 C 的优点分析以及汇编的接近很赞同。
: 但是根本没有说明为什么 clojure 是新的 C。
: 就是可以运行时候自己修改自己代码？
: 论据非常弱。
: Clojure 绝对没有可能接近 C 的地位。
|
z******g
发帖数: 271 | 5 Conrad W.
The term "next C" is ambiguous but intriguing. Does it signify:
(a). a low-level error-prone general-purpose language?
(b). a language that captures market share beyond expectations?
(c). or a language suited to teaching beginning programming?
Whatever the answer, we look forward to this presentation.
November 21
Robert M.
My argument will be (a). Clojure is a low level language suitable for much
of the kind of work that C (and C++) is used for at the moment.
November 27
【在 l*********s 的大作中提到】
: It is an analogy, since clojure is easy to learn and use, just like C.
|
N*****m
发帖数: 42603 | 6 ft
【在 z******g 的大作中提到】
: Conrad W.
: The term "next C" is ambiguous but intriguing. Does it signify:
: (a). a low-level error-prone general-purpose language?
: (b). a language that captures market share beyond expectations?
: (c). or a language suited to teaching beginning programming?
: Whatever the answer, we look forward to this presentation.
: November 21
: Robert M.
: My argument will be (a). Clojure is a low level language suitable for much
: of the kind of work that C (and C++) is used for at the moment.
|
S*A
发帖数: 7142 | 7 如果是 C++ 的替代直接说是 new C++ 好了。
It on top of JVM how can it be a low level language.
他自己说了C接近汇编有多好，然后Closure 怎么可能
是接近汇编的那种。
Easier to program than C? You are kidding me. |
