a****a 发帖数: 27 | 1 我虽然在PhD 教育心理,但其中需要写论文拿master先。我目前的想法是想用国内大学
生
做研究对象,做有关兴趣测试方面的东西。由于没有这方面的经验,特想大家讨教,取众
家之长 :)有些主要的地方想问问各位有没有类似的经验:
1。 用什么样的兴趣测试比较可行? 我目前考虑的有Self-Directed Search和
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator? 见过前者的试题,后者没有见过。有没有同仁用过其中
任何一个,或者有其它推荐?
2。 我的想法是选一套试题,population取中国学生,然后来看看用另一个population的
时候,这套试题的validity如何。然后如果可能的话,和以前population做对比。
3。
我到现在还不是很清楚如果要用这些试题的话,需要和作者商量以取得使用的permission
吗?如果这些试题在学校是要付钱才能使用的话,我让作者同意我免费在中国使用会不会
很过分?
4。这个问题比较泛: 大家经常和导师还有committee的人交流吗? 我现在不当RA,老板
根本不管我,一个学期就见2,3次,主要讨论我下学期的选课,就这2,3 |
j****e 发帖数: 245 | 2 I do not know very much and just have a few words to say regarding the first
question.
Self-directed search is a general approach to assess interests. One of the
most well-known method is Holland's six career themes. I am sure that you can
find more information regarding the questionaire for self-directed search. It
is a fairly widely-used approach. As for MBTI, it is more of a personality
test than anything else. It might give some indication regarding the potential
career interest or match. Bu
【在 a****a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 我虽然在PhD 教育心理,但其中需要写论文拿master先。我目前的想法是想用国内大学 : 生 : 做研究对象,做有关兴趣测试方面的东西。由于没有这方面的经验,特想大家讨教,取众 : 家之长 :)有些主要的地方想问问各位有没有类似的经验: : 1。 用什么样的兴趣测试比较可行? 我目前考虑的有Self-Directed Search和 : Myers-Briggs Type Indicator? 见过前者的试题,后者没有见过。有没有同仁用过其中 : 任何一个,或者有其它推荐? : 2。 我的想法是选一套试题,population取中国学生,然后来看看用另一个population的 : 时候,这套试题的validity如何。然后如果可能的话,和以前population做对比。 : 3。
|
a****a 发帖数: 27 | 3 Thank you very much for your information and suggestions. Yes, SDS is more of
interest test than MBTI. Do you think it is better to use SDS if I am going to
conduct survey among Chinese college students? SDS is well established here in
the US and many universities use it to assist students in their major choosing
and job hunting. The interpretation of a SDS test makes a lot of sense to
those who are struggling with choices. However, the question is: How can I
make use of the SDS report if I am g
【在 j****e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : I do not know very much and just have a few words to say regarding the first : question. : Self-directed search is a general approach to assess interests. One of the : most well-known method is Holland's six career themes. I am sure that you can : find more information regarding the questionaire for self-directed search. It : is a fairly widely-used approach. As for MBTI, it is more of a personality : test than anything else. It might give some indication regarding the potential : career interest or match. Bu
|
r******s 发帖数: 2155 | 4 白利刚,方俐洛和凌文铨汉化了霍兰的职业兴趣量表,以下四篇文章都发在心理学报上。
美国有的图书馆可能会有。Hope it helps.
Study on the vocational value of Chinese undergraduates. Ling, Wenquan;
Fang, Liluo; Bai, Ligang Acta Psychologica Sinica Vol 31(3)1999 p.342-348
Science Press, China [Find a Copy]
Confirmatory factor analysis of the construct validity of the Chinese
Vocational Interest Inventory of Holland Type: I: The inventory's convergent
validity and discriminant validity. Bai, Ligang; Lin, Wenquan; Fang, Liluo
Acta Psychologica Sinica V
【在 a****a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Thank you very much for your information and suggestions. Yes, SDS is more of : interest test than MBTI. Do you think it is better to use SDS if I am going to : conduct survey among Chinese college students? SDS is well established here in : the US and many universities use it to assist students in their major choosing : and job hunting. The interpretation of a SDS test makes a lot of sense to : those who are struggling with choices. However, the question is: How can I : make use of the SDS report if I am g
|
a****a 发帖数: 27 | 5 多谢多谢!我想他们这个可能就是一个月前教育部出台的大学生兴趣测量软件(之类的东
东,帮助学生选专业的,估计下一步就是选工作了)的研究背景了吧。我再找找相关资料
看看。再次感谢!^_^
。
28(2)1996
going
here
the
you
search.
personality
measurement.
【在 r******s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 白利刚,方俐洛和凌文铨汉化了霍兰的职业兴趣量表,以下四篇文章都发在心理学报上。 : 美国有的图书馆可能会有。Hope it helps. : Study on the vocational value of Chinese undergraduates. Ling, Wenquan; : Fang, Liluo; Bai, Ligang Acta Psychologica Sinica Vol 31(3)1999 p.342-348 : Science Press, China [Find a Copy] : Confirmatory factor analysis of the construct validity of the Chinese : Vocational Interest Inventory of Holland Type: I: The inventory's convergent : validity and discriminant validity. Bai, Ligang; Lin, Wenquan; Fang, Liluo : Acta Psychologica Sinica V
|
j****e 发帖数: 245 | 6 I have not started my study in psychology yet. So I do not really know
anything deeper than the surface or anything in detail. Sorry that I won't be
of too much a help for you and your research. However, I do think that you can
definitely do quantitative research using SDS approaches, since you use
inventory and obtain quatitative data from it through statistical analysis.
I think your cultural sensitivity is very good. We do need to be aware of the
cultural difference and the fitness of the me |
a****a 发帖数: 27 | 7 I am grateful for your kindness. I know quanitiative methods will be
applicable and most appropriate for my study. What I was considering is where
to put the SDS report if I am going to use it. Since the report is a rather
detailed descriptive document, only using quantitative methodology might lose
some individual information. Adjusting the amount of quantitative element is
necessary in my opinion. Another concern is the external criterion for the
validation process using a Chinese population.
【在 j****e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : I have not started my study in psychology yet. So I do not really know : anything deeper than the surface or anything in detail. Sorry that I won't be : of too much a help for you and your research. However, I do think that you can : definitely do quantitative research using SDS approaches, since you use : inventory and obtain quatitative data from it through statistical analysis. : I think your cultural sensitivity is very good. We do need to be aware of the : cultural difference and the fitness of the me
|
r******s 发帖数: 2155 | 8 you may already seen this. Hope it helps:
Convergent and discriminant validity of five interest inventories. Savickas,
Mark L.; Taber, Brian J.; Spokane, Arnold R. Journal of Vocational Behavior
Vol 61(1)2002 p.139-184
where
lose
in
thoughts
analysis.
I
of
【在 a****a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : I am grateful for your kindness. I know quanitiative methods will be : applicable and most appropriate for my study. What I was considering is where : to put the SDS report if I am going to use it. Since the report is a rather : detailed descriptive document, only using quantitative methodology might lose : some individual information. Adjusting the amount of quantitative element is : necessary in my opinion. Another concern is the external criterion for the : validation process using a Chinese population.
|