boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Psychology版 - [转载] A statistic question?
相关主题
家庭/宗教/文化 研究, 有招博士的吗
Web Course on Latent Variable Modeling
精神分裂症与星座
请问有从生物转学心理需要怎么准备
如何模拟人的兴趣增减等?
Sternberg's work on intelligence(ZT)
中国父母喜欢送孩子早上学
Re: [转载] Of SR but PI
A quick question
心理学实验的真实性
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: variables话题: statistic话题: two话题: question
进入Psychology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
r******s
发帖数: 2155
1
【 以下文字转载自 Business 讨论区,原文如下 】
发信人: pringle (softbutcrisp), 信区: Business
标 题: A statistic question?
发信站: Unknown Space - 未名空间 (Wed Apr 27 18:59:39 2005) WWW-POST
If simple correlation shows that two variables are not significantly
correlated, could the two variables still be statistically associated?
Especially, could the nonsignificant simple correlation be caused by other
confounding factors?
Is it possible that by controlling for the other potential confounding
factors, we could still find th
j****e
发帖数: 245
2
Just my 2 cents. Corrections are welcome!
Intuitively it sounds possible to me. However, mathematically speaking, the
Squared Pearson Correlation is the shared proportion of variance between the
two variables. In the given case, it was not significant. It might be helpful
to draw a simple Venn Diagram. Only when significant amount of variance in the
DV is accounted for by other strong predictors that don't correlate with the
original IV, it may be possible for the semipartial/partial coefficient

【在 r******s 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Business 讨论区,原文如下 】
: 发信人: pringle (softbutcrisp), 信区: Business
: 标 题: A statistic question?
: 发信站: Unknown Space - 未名空间 (Wed Apr 27 18:59:39 2005) WWW-POST
: If simple correlation shows that two variables are not significantly
: correlated, could the two variables still be statistically associated?
: Especially, could the nonsignificant simple correlation be caused by other
: confounding factors?
: Is it possible that by controlling for the other potential confounding
: factors, we could still find th

A***A
发帖数: 98
3
We will probably need a clarification on what is meant by "statistically
associated."
If you mean the two random variables are statistically non-independent, then a
zero correlation does not imply independence. It will only imply independence
if the two variables are jointly normal.
A simple counter-example: y = x^2, then cor(x,y) = 0, but the two are clearly
not independent. It's just that the correlation only captures the linear
association between two variables.
Hmm. If there are more than
d**e
发帖数: 9591
4
###此帖已应当事人要求删除###

【在 r******s 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Business 讨论区,原文如下 】
: 发信人: pringle (softbutcrisp), 信区: Business
: 标 题: A statistic question?
: 发信站: Unknown Space - 未名空间 (Wed Apr 27 18:59:39 2005) WWW-POST
: If simple correlation shows that two variables are not significantly
: correlated, could the two variables still be statistically associated?
: Especially, could the nonsignificant simple correlation be caused by other
: confounding factors?
: Is it possible that by controlling for the other potential confounding
: factors, we could still find th

1 (共1页)
进入Psychology版参与讨论
相关主题
心理学实验的真实性
Regarding asking questions
help.计算因素结构比较后的Congrunce coefficient.
michael jackson is the smartest
心理知识竞赛
Suicide and Motherhood: Negative Correlation
请教一个心理学的术语
包子急问2010 census里的 residential mobility
给心理板块一点建议
survey bias correction问题 (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: variables话题: statistic话题: two话题: question