r******s
发帖数: 2155 | | A***A
发帖数: 98 | 2 I only know one: Pioneers of Psychology by Raymond Fancher. Not a very
interesting book though.
【在 r******s 的大作中提到】
: 包括近代的。
| r******s
发帖数: 2155 | 3
Actually David Hothersall's book is pretty good. I took his class the
first
quarter when I came to US. It was 7:30 in the morning. With his heavy English
accent
and the sleepiness, I literally learned nothing in that class.
Now, the more I learn, the more I realize that everything in psychology,
or even
social and behavioral sciences, is connected. That's why I am thinking of find
a book
that is comprehensive in terms of covering the whole spectrum of psychology.
【在 A***A 的大作中提到】
: I only know one: Pioneers of Psychology by Raymond Fancher. Not a very
: interesting book though.
| a*e
发帖数: 431 | 4 The one that I used in my history class, The First Century of Experimental
Psychology by Elist Hearst, is another not-so-interesting text..
【在 A***A 的大作中提到】
: I only know one: Pioneers of Psychology by Raymond Fancher. Not a very
: interesting book though.
| h*i
发帖数: 3446 | 5 Maybe I am suggesting a detour here, but I think it should get you very far.
What I am trying to suggest is to start with a good understanding of the histo
ry of western philosophy. You won't go wrong with Bertrand Russell's classic h
ere. After getting through that one, the history of psychology is pretty easy
to grasp. All the X'isms in psychology will all make sense, as I had felt whi
le in college :)
【在 r******s 的大作中提到】
:
: Actually David Hothersall's book is pretty good. I took his class the
: first
: quarter when I came to US. It was 7:30 in the morning. With his heavy English
: accent
: and the sleepiness, I literally learned nothing in that class.
: Now, the more I learn, the more I realize that everything in psychology,
: or even
: social and behavioral sciences, is connected. That's why I am thinking of find
: a book
|
|
