b*******e
发帖数: 86 | |
r*******m
发帖数: 109 | 2 not good
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: 大家讨论一下 HFT 的前途怎么样？
|
b*******e
发帖数: 86 | 3 the reason? Can you expand it a little bit? Thanks a lot!
【在 r*******m 的大作中提到】
: not good
|
G********d
发帖数: 10250 | 4 I agree
【在 r*******m 的大作中提到】
: not good
|
j*******y
发帖数: 105 | |
g***s
发帖数: 3811 | |
l***m
发帖数: 920 | 7 对。所以regulators也很看重这一块。
【在 g***s 的大作中提到】
: 我也很奇怪。现在各大IB可是很看重这一块。
|
G*********o
发帖数: 2045 | 8 How about electronic market making (equtiy, fx, fixed income, not hft prop
trading though)? |
p******i
发帖数: 1358 | 9 谁说的？
【在 g***s 的大作中提到】
: 我也很奇怪。现在各大IB可是很看重这一块。
|
g***s
发帖数: 3811 | 10 i'm working in this area.
【在 p******i 的大作中提到】
: 谁说的？
|
|
|
p****u
发帖数: 2596 | 11 我也觉得这块不好。。进入１０年明显这个里面开始饱和。。?
【在 G********d 的大作中提到】
: I agree
|
k*****a
发帖数: 7389 | |
r*******m
发帖数: 109 | 13 reason is the competition. For high frequency trading, the opportunity or
money made is the same, but imagine what happen if 10x people are doing this
. True people are expanding in this area because they just don't have
confidence about other areas, or regulator do not allow them to take huge
risk in low frequency stuff anymore.
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: the reason? Can you expand it a little bit? Thanks a lot!
|
o*******6
发帖数: 6113 | |
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 15 disagree, the reason
ppl went for high frequency trading is they believed in higher
inefficiency in high frequency or totally different kind of inefficiency.
eg, automatic market making, could only happen within time of a blink.
the opportunity is not the same, but it will converge as more and more
competitors jump in.
early birds get fat, but the opportunity will decay.
this
【在 r*******m 的大作中提到】
: reason is the competition. For high frequency trading, the opportunity or
: money made is the same, but imagine what happen if 10x people are doing this
: . True people are expanding in this area because they just don't have
: confidence about other areas, or regulator do not allow them to take huge
: risk in low frequency stuff anymore.
|
