N*****m
发帖数: 42603 | |
D********n
发帖数: 978 | 2 我同意你说的法国人喜欢瞎搞。
也同意最近大的是法国人搞的。
只是不知道你说的你大的是哪2个。 |
N*****m
发帖数: 42603 | 3 最近JPM的伦敦鲸和08年法兴SoG的Kerviel
【在 D********n 的大作中提到】
: 我同意你说的法国人喜欢瞎搞。
: 也同意最近大的是法国人搞的。
: 只是不知道你说的你大的是哪2个。
|
D********n
发帖数: 978 | 4 雷啊，伦敦鲸也能算大的...它只能算是蠢的。
跟Hollande上台要重新和Merkel negotiate fiscal compact比，
算个P啊!!!
【在 N*****m 的大作中提到】
: 最近JPM的伦敦鲸和08年法兴SoG的Kerviel
|
N*****m
发帖数: 42603 | 5 在说交易员呢
你这个宏观层面的，是另一码事
【在 D********n 的大作中提到】
: 雷啊，伦敦鲸也能算大的...它只能算是蠢的。
: 跟Hollande上台要重新和Merkel negotiate fiscal compact比，
: 算个P啊!!!
|
D********n
发帖数: 978 | 6 强，fiscal compact不算是交易，就你家买个derivatives hedge一下算是交易。
【在 N*****m 的大作中提到】
: 在说交易员呢
: 你这个宏观层面的，是另一码事
|
N*****m
发帖数: 42603 | 7 “交易员”......
你这种是宏观的政策层面，是一码事么？
不能瞎抬杠啊
【在 D********n 的大作中提到】
: 强，fiscal compact不算是交易，就你家买个derivatives hedge一下算是交易。
|
D********n
发帖数: 978 | 8 你这孩子没幽默感，哥不逗你了...
【在 N*****m 的大作中提到】
: “交易员”......
: 你这种是宏观的政策层面，是一码事么？
: 不能瞎抬杠啊
|
Y******u
发帖数: 1912 | 9 谁被搞大了？
【在 D********n 的大作中提到】
: 我同意你说的法国人喜欢瞎搞。
: 也同意最近大的是法国人搞的。
: 只是不知道你说的你大的是哪2个。
|
j******n
发帖数: 287 | 10 2 billion dollar loss is big for any firm.
If you are not making (or losing) billions of dollar, just don’t talk like
you can make (or lose) billions of dollar.
【在 D********n 的大作中提到】
: 雷啊，伦敦鲸也能算大的...它只能算是蠢的。
: 跟Hollande上台要重新和Merkel negotiate fiscal compact比，
: 算个P啊!!!
|
|
|
D********n
发帖数: 978 | 11 Could you stop talking like you know stuff?
like
【在 j******n 的大作中提到】
: 2 billion dollar loss is big for any firm.
: If you are not making (or losing) billions of dollar, just don’t talk like
: you can make (or lose) billions of dollar.
|
j******n
发帖数: 287 | 12 I have to admit that I know nothing about quant or FE. But I always have
tremendous respect for traders whoever can make or lose 2 billions dollar.
By saying "London Whale" is stupid, are you implying you are smarter than
him?
【在 D********n 的大作中提到】
: Could you stop talking like you know stuff?
:
: like
|
D********n
发帖数: 978 | 13 Dude, you keep on mixing gaining $2B and losing $2B. It is totally different
though just a flip of the sign. Glad you are not pretending any more but
you need to understand the difference between +$2B and -$2B.
【在 j******n 的大作中提到】
: I have to admit that I know nothing about quant or FE. But I always have
: tremendous respect for traders whoever can make or lose 2 billions dollar.
: By saying "London Whale" is stupid, are you implying you are smarter than
: him?
|
m****s
发帖数: 7397 | 14 salut
wee wee
bon
voila
salut |
j******n
发帖数: 287 | 15 For a trader like "London Whale", the difference between making or losing 2
billion is not as huge as YOU can imagine . The hard thing is to get to a
position that allow you to make or lose 2 billion under current environment.
different
【在 D********n 的大作中提到】
: Dude, you keep on mixing gaining $2B and losing $2B. It is totally different
: though just a flip of the sign. Glad you are not pretending any more but
: you need to understand the difference between +$2B and -$2B.
:
:
|
j******n
发帖数: 287 | 16 So you dare not to say you are smarter than "London Whale". And you think
that the "London Whale" is stupid. The only conclusion I can get is that you
think you are stupid.
different
【在 D********n 的大作中提到】
: Dude, you keep on mixing gaining $2B and losing $2B. It is totally different
: though just a flip of the sign. Glad you are not pretending any more but
: you need to understand the difference between +$2B and -$2B.
:
:
|
