m********8 发帖数: 7463 | 1 在一个什么私募工作的。嗬嗬
红酒还8错,估计他喝多了。说了这么一句
“矿工在我们老总眼里,就类似于哇bitcoin的矿机,耗他妈狠多电,哇出来的币越来
越少。早晚有一天都给他们切了。”
听后无语。求牛逼戈评论。。。。。。 |
D********n 发帖数: 978 | 2 "私募"这两个字暴露了LZ...
【在 m********8 的大作中提到】 : 在一个什么私募工作的。嗬嗬 : 红酒还8错,估计他喝多了。说了这么一句 : “矿工在我们老总眼里,就类似于哇bitcoin的矿机,耗他妈狠多电,哇出来的币越来 : 越少。早晚有一天都给他们切了。” : 听后无语。求牛逼戈评论。。。。。。
|
m********8 发帖数: 7463 | 3 暴露啥,中文论坛上用中文这个词有何不妥?
【在 D********n 的大作中提到】 : "私募"这两个字暴露了LZ...
|
l**********e 发帖数: 336 | 4 私募only != nb fund, who cares a wsn said from a no name place
【在 m********8 的大作中提到】 : 暴露啥,中文论坛上用中文这个词有何不妥?
|
p****u 发帖数: 2596 | 5 no name place可不一定待遇差。街上闷声发大财的多的是。
【在 l**********e 的大作中提到】 : 私募only != nb fund, who cares a wsn said from a no name place
|
l**********e 发帖数: 336 | 6 if a no name place "闷声发大财" for many years (not 1 or 2), then it is not
a no name place for sure
【在 p****u 的大作中提到】 : no name place可不一定待遇差。街上闷声发大财的多的是。
|
x******a 发帖数: 6336 | |
D****6 发帖数: 278 | |
h****e 发帖数: 2125 | 9 this is simply not true:
"
When New York-based broker FXCM acquired London-based proprietary trading
group Lucid Markets in June, the firms's regulatory filings lifted the lid
on
Lucid's market presence, with an average daily trading volume of $35 billion
and a total volume of $13.4 trillion for 2011.
"
not
【在 l**********e 的大作中提到】 : if a no name place "闷声发大财" for many years (not 1 or 2), then it is not : a no name place for sure
|
D********n 发帖数: 978 | 10 哦, 你是说Lucid Markets是个no name place, FXCM胡乱买着玩买了,后来FXCM才惊喜
的发现Lucid Markets原来一直闷声发大财?
怎么可能?你不知道的地方不代表就是no name place.
billion
【在 h****e 的大作中提到】 : this is simply not true: : " : When New York-based broker FXCM acquired London-based proprietary trading : group Lucid Markets in June, the firms's regulatory filings lifted the lid : on : Lucid's market presence, with an average daily trading volume of $35 billion : and a total volume of $13.4 trillion for 2011. : " : : not
|
s*********i 发帖数: 218 | |
m********8 发帖数: 7463 | 12 "矿工就类似于哇bitcoin的矿机,耗他妈狠多电,哇出来的币越来
越少。" 这句话到底有木有一腚的道理? |
L******g 发帖数: 1371 | |
s***g 发帖数: 259 | 14 lucid market is quite a famous place actually. If you are familiar with FX,
you would know.
FXCM did not buy Lucid for no reason and their volume/pnl was no surprise to
FXCM for sure.
billion
【在 h****e 的大作中提到】 : this is simply not true: : " : When New York-based broker FXCM acquired London-based proprietary trading : group Lucid Markets in June, the firms's regulatory filings lifted the lid : on : Lucid's market presence, with an average daily trading volume of $35 billion : and a total volume of $13.4 trillion for 2011. : " : : not
|