z**t
发帖数: 83 | 1 http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/books/10/20/harry.potter.ap/index.html
NEW YORK (AP) -- Harry Potter fans, the rumors are true: Albus Dumbledore,
master wizard and Headmaster of Hogwarts, is gay.
J.K. Rowling, author of the mega-selling fantasy series that ended last
summer, outed the beloved character Friday night while appearing before a
full house at Carnegie Hall. After reading briefly from the final book, "
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," she took questions from audience
members.
She | t**n
发帖数: 30 | 2 Rowling must have been put under IMPERIO spell.
I am STUPEFIED and somebody please find some OBLIVIATORs!!! | q*n
发帖数: 1203 | 3 http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15528724&ft=1&f=1032
This NPR commentary is hillarious..:)
【在 t**n 的大作中提到】
: Rowling must have been put under IMPERIO spell.
: I am STUPEFIED and somebody please find some OBLIVIATORs!!!
| t**n
发帖数: 30 | 4 To put it forward, I am not aginst gay people. It's not my damn business to
mind other people's life.
Needless to say, Rowling created the character of Albus Dumbledore and she
has the right to interpret her creation however she feels like before it's
published. However, once it’s out, it no longer belongs solely to the
author anymore.
It's just the explanation is not convincing enough. The so-called “true
love” of Dumbledore with Grindelwald can be also deemed as the profound
mutual understandi
【在 q*n 的大作中提到】
: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15528724&ft=1&f=1032
: This NPR commentary is hillarious..:)
| o**3
发帖数: 6 | 5 I consider probably Rowling was just kidding.
I agree there is no need to put some "spicy" on it, as the 7 books are
excellent deja.
You said, "once it's out, it no longer belongs solely to the author anymore"
. Very well said indeed.
But what she said, D's love, probalby be his great tragety.
How many times did you read the seven books? //curious
to
The
straight
【在 t**n 的大作中提到】
: To put it forward, I am not aginst gay people. It's not my damn business to
: mind other people's life.
: Needless to say, Rowling created the character of Albus Dumbledore and she
: has the right to interpret her creation however she feels like before it's
: published. However, once it’s out, it no longer belongs solely to the
: author anymore.
: It's just the explanation is not convincing enough. The so-called “true
: love” of Dumbledore with Grindelwald can be also deemed as the profound
: mutual understandi
| o**3
发帖数: 6 | 6 Oblive tout!~~~
【在 t**n 的大作中提到】
: Rowling must have been put under IMPERIO spell.
: I am STUPEFIED and somebody please find some OBLIVIATORs!!!
| t**n
发帖数: 30 | 7 Thanks for the comment.
2 or 3 times each, but more on the last three books.
anymore"
【在 o**3 的大作中提到】
: I consider probably Rowling was just kidding.
: I agree there is no need to put some "spicy" on it, as the 7 books are
: excellent deja.
: You said, "once it's out, it no longer belongs solely to the author anymore"
: . Very well said indeed.
: But what she said, D's love, probalby be his great tragety.
: How many times did you read the seven books? //curious
:
: to
: The
| o**3
发帖数: 6 | 8 Thank you for reviewing.//@@
I read them several times too. I found it was very interesting to pay
attention to details. Some tiny adjectives, verbs, reveal really a lot,
especially when you read the book again then you will find it.
【在 t**n 的大作中提到】
: Thanks for the comment.
: 2 or 3 times each, but more on the last three books.
:
: anymore"
| or
发帖数: 720 | 9 book 7 did give me the impression that Dumbledore might be gay..there are
some implicit sentences reading strangely and secretively.. but at the time
i thot i might be overeading into lines or got that impression from some
maniac fanfictions flooded on the internet these days.
after all i was not too sensitive..;)
wonder whether rowling set this right at the beginning or get the idea later
. | s****s
发帖数: 19 | 10 like a general saying - if you look for it, you will find it.
It is Rowling's interpretation anyway. If it is inconsistent with the
characters all along, then it is a bad interpretation.
Also, suppose D has feelings for G, it has to cross a certain threshold to
make him a gay, and of course, my use of gay may not be the same as your use
of gay... whatsoever... hoho |
|
