j********d
发帖数: 157 | 1 Any expert to comment the possibility of rewrite 214(b) in immigration code?
If there is someone challenge it from the point view of constitution, what
would be the possible outcome? In the past, many laws were removed after
the court ruled they were against constitution. |
E********e
发帖数: 1734 | 2 没门。
宪法是对美国公民的。214(b)是对外国人的。任何外国人没有进入美国的权利。
code?
what
【在 j********d 的大作中提到】
: Any expert to comment the possibility of rewrite 214(b) in immigration code?
: If there is someone challenge it from the point view of constitution, what
: would be the possible outcome? In the past, many laws were removed after
: the court ruled they were against constitution.
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 3 We can start to think about it when the Chinese population in US is
comparable to Hispanic.
code?
what
【在 j********d 的大作中提到】
: Any expert to comment the possibility of rewrite 214(b) in immigration code?
: If there is someone challenge it from the point view of constitution, what
: would be the possible outcome? In the past, many laws were removed after
: the court ruled they were against constitution.
|
m******n
发帖数: 15691 | 4 u should use was instead of is
after
【在 n********r 的大作中提到】
: We can start to think about it when the Chinese population in US is
: comparable to Hispanic.
:
: code?
: what
|
j********d
发帖数: 157 | 5 Anybody here really have a good understanding of US constitution? I
personally don't have much knowledge of US constitution except I know the
fact that many laws were trashed after court rules they were against US
constitution.
The right of people from other country entering US is one thing. But I
think the key point here is if someone can challenge the assumption of
immigration intent in court and win the case. Beside population of US
citizen from Chinese origin, I guess there also need someone really
understand the US constitution / its impact on other laws and willing to
fight for removal of 214(b) if there is good chance.
【在 E********e 的大作中提到】
: 没门。
: 宪法是对美国公民的。214(b)是对外国人的。任何外国人没有进入美国的权利。
:
: code?
: what
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 6 When was that? Anyway, laws are politics. Just look at what is
going on now at Supre Court in the election year, Obamacare,
Arizona immigration law, and at a Florida court, Trayvon Martin
shooting case. All politics.
【在 m******n 的大作中提到】
: u should use was instead of is
:
: after
|
