m*******a
发帖数: 192 | | W*N
发帖数: 1354 | 2 I think its the total package, including medical insurance for family etc.
【在 m*******a 的大作中提到】
: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2011/pay/
| g***l
发帖数: 18555 | | P*******e
发帖数: 1353 | 4 no, it is for "Engineer, Staff" as they put
【在 W*N 的大作中提到】
: I think its the total package, including medical insurance for family etc.
| s******1
发帖数: 404 | | W*N
发帖数: 1354 | 6 Even for staff engineer, I don't think their base salary is that.
There is a concept of total compensation. There is even a website for each
QC employee to see how much the company spent on them each year, including
medical cost, 401k matching, etc.
【在 P*******e 的大作中提到】
: no, it is for "Engineer, Staff" as they put
| g*****h
发帖数: 81 | 7 我觉得Staff level分布会比较大。
Q的retention rate还可以，有不少老人混得时间长title
还是Staff，但薪水会比较高
新进员工三五年就升Staff的薪水会低不少。
分布比较大的结果就是除非样本集大，不然不准。
结论是就是看看就好，该干嘛干嘛。
each
including
【在 W*N 的大作中提到】
: Even for staff engineer, I don't think their base salary is that.
: There is a concept of total compensation. There is even a website for each
: QC employee to see how much the company spent on them each year, including
: medical cost, 401k matching, etc.
|
|
