p*********y
发帖数: 2741 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 CivilSociety 讨论区 】
发信人: playadelrey (A smile is a curve gets things straight), 信区: CivilSociety
标 题: Most Racist Bill in California History? SCA 5 by Democrat Senator Hernandez—Forces Racism as Criteri
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Feb 18 20:30:27 2014, 美东)
Most Racist Bill in California History? SCA 5 by Democrat Senator Hernandez
—Forces Racism as Criteria to Entrance to UC Schools/ Limit Womens’
Enrollment As Well
by Stephen Frank on 02/02/2014
California government schools policies are quickly resembling those of the
1950’s-60’s Alabama. Based on race, both States enrolled students based
on race rather than qualifications. Racism, black or white is wrong—unless
you are a Brown/Obama Progressive. Amazing how many white progressives
think it is OK to enroll students based on race when their father and mother
marched in Selma, Alabama against this form of racist policy.
Also, this expands the War on Women, since the new policies would LIMIT the
number of women allowed in California government universities.
“The bill will require what amounts to discrimination against the gender
that is too frequently admitted — you guessed, WOMEN.
In 2010 the UC system admitted 95,403 women and only 84,178 men — a PRIMA
FACIE case confirming discrimination. I look forward to the innovative
progressive implementation of this solution to gender discrimination.”
SCA 5 by Democrat Senator Hernandez may be the most racist bill introduced
in a State legislature since the 1965 Civil Rights Act—it is openly and
specifically racist. George Wallace would be proud of Hernandez—both
Democrats, both racists.
The Jew and Asian California University Quota Limitation Act
Richard Rider Rants, 2/1/14
This Associated Press “story” the U-T ran (at the bottom of this blog) is
essentially the “cut and paste” version of the dishonest press release put
out by proponents. The AP is no longer a press organization — it’s become
largely a government “information” distribution channel. No fact
checking allowed.
Here’s what the story says: “In 1995, minority students accounted for 38
percent of high school graduates and 21 percent of those entering as
University of California freshmen, Hernandez said. By 2004, they made up 45
percent of high school graduates but 18 percent of incoming UC freshmen, he
said, adding the gap is growing.”
But go look at the official stats of the demographics of 2013 incoming UC
freshman:
http://www.ucop.edu/news/factsheets/2013/fall_2013_admissions_t (end of the table)
So, what’s the percentage of incoming freshmen who are white (INCLUDING “
other”)? 28.1% — well BELOW the percentage of whites in California (42.3%)
. And BTW, note that this table shows that the percentage of the
selectively designated “oppressed” minority admissions is NOT shrinking —
it’s remarkably level. The drop they ballyhoo is the ending in 1996 of
the disastrous and discriminatory quota system that existed before we passed
Prop 209 to make such discrimination illegal.
This bill is not about countering white privilege. It’s about setting up DE
FACTO quotas for ASIANS — which constitute a (supposedly evil)
disproportionately high 36% of admissions vs. 14.9% of the CA population.
Apparently these Asian kids “act white” FAR better than even WHITE kids
act white!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_California
To make the numbers being used to justify the bill favorable, the
affirmative action (not quotas, of course) sponsors made the Asians minority
part of the “white” majority (which is not a majority). Ipso presto,
discrimination abounds!!
Such racist dishonesty is breathtaking — until one realizes that, well,
this IS California. It’s okay to discriminate against Asians in the Golden
State — just as it was once acceptable to establish informal admission
quotas on high-performing Jews at Ivy League colleges a century ago.
NOTE: Here’s an aspect of the bill that most will overlook. Included in
this new stealth quota system bill is a redress of the longstanding
grievance against gender discrimination. It’s gone on for generations and
continues even today — ask any liberal.
But here’s the thing: The bill will require what amounts to discrimination
against the gender that is too frequently admitted — you guessed, WOMEN.
In 2010 the UC system admitted 95,403 women and only 84,178 men — a PRIMA
FACIE case confirming discrimination. I look forward to the innovative
progressive implementation of this solution to gender discrimination.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/jan/31/tp-bid-to-undo-ban-o |
|
