n*****g
发帖数: 626 | 1 The 2010 election is fundamentally different from other elections
in the past which may have focused on social issues such as gay marriage,
abortion, "hope" & "change". The 2010 election is going to decide America's
economic future for the next 30 years even longer. If we make wrong choice,
US will become a third world country and whatever you cared about may get
lost forever.
The choice is very clear, do you vote for the Party of Paycheck or
the Party of Food Stamps?
40 Million US population are already on Food Stamps, highest point in US
history. It is NOT Bush's fault. Nancy Pelosi claimed that Food Stamp
gives best bang for the buck. The more the better. Do you really want
to keep her the real witch 2nd-in-line to US presidency?
I bet most of your health insurance premium will go up in 2011. It will
keep increasing every year until 2018 when Obamacare fully kicks in. Please
do not blame your CEO for laying off workers, if he/she does not, the
whole company will go down like GM.
The Party of Food Stamps want to keep you on food stamps so that those
ellites can keep ripping off tax payers for their own benefit -- Just like
they intentionally keep black community in poverty so that they keep voting
for Dems.
Enough is enough. Government does not create jobs, business creates jobs.
It is time to go back to fundamental and let people in charge of their own
destination.
If you are a hardworking American, please vote for your own benefit, vote
for the Party of Paycheck. We the people will win on Nov 2, 2010. | b*******r
发帖数: 6655 | 2 actually more and more paychecks depend on food stamps or the like. | G****s
发帖数: 3523 | 3 circular dependency.
but that is doomed to fail.
【在 b*******r 的大作中提到】
: actually more and more paychecks depend on food stamps or the like.
| b*******r
发帖数: 6655 | 4 of course, socialism, is the last phase of human sociaety, which means death
is destined
【在 G****s 的大作中提到】
: circular dependency.
: but that is doomed to fail.
| n*****g
发帖数: 626 | 5 Well, this is basically Nancy Pelosi's argument, $1 food stamp
generates $1.84 GDP. So more foodstamp, the better.
But if 300 M people are on foodstamp, who is going to work
to pay for all the food stamps?
If the number of people on food stamps is reduced by 20 M (50%),
and work and spend more money into economy, isn't that better
over all?
But it is bad for Nancy Pelosi, because that means more power
to the people, less power to the Party of Food Stamps.
【在 b*******r 的大作中提到】
: actually more and more paychecks depend on food stamps or the like.
| b*******r
发帖数: 6655 | 6 If so, billions of Chinese indian workers will continue to work hard to pay
for food stamps of 300M American lazy bones.
You can cut food stamps however you want, but those lazy bones still won't
work. Trust me, just like bears at yellowstone long time ago, monkeys at
Emei mount right now, they will be happy to die in hungry if you don't feed
them.
Actually we should thank Nancy Pelosiand and the like, because they
dramatically reduced your competitors on the job market. If Americans are
working as hard as WW2 era, you and me would be lucky to be bus boys in
chinese restaurants.
【在 n*****g 的大作中提到】
: Well, this is basically Nancy Pelosi's argument, $1 food stamp
: generates $1.84 GDP. So more foodstamp, the better.
: But if 300 M people are on foodstamp, who is going to work
: to pay for all the food stamps?
: If the number of people on food stamps is reduced by 20 M (50%),
: and work and spend more money into economy, isn't that better
: over all?
: But it is bad for Nancy Pelosi, because that means more power
: to the people, less power to the Party of Food Stamps.
| n*****g
发帖数: 626 | 7 It is the system that makes them lazy bones. Most of people on this
board with US citizenship will continue to live and work in US. I
bet no one wants to compete for the job of Food Stamp distributor
in the future since that will be the only job available if we keep
voting for the Party of Food Stamps. Well you can not even compete
for that job since you may not be member of the "Food Stamp Distributor
Union".
Majority of Americans still prefer a paycheck. It is more like 75%
regular honoest workers vs 25% ellites plus the lazy bones you refer to.
There are more of us than them. Use your ballot to make a difference
for your own benefit.
pay
feed
【在 b*******r 的大作中提到】
: If so, billions of Chinese indian workers will continue to work hard to pay
: for food stamps of 300M American lazy bones.
: You can cut food stamps however you want, but those lazy bones still won't
: work. Trust me, just like bears at yellowstone long time ago, monkeys at
: Emei mount right now, they will be happy to die in hungry if you don't feed
: them.
: Actually we should thank Nancy Pelosiand and the like, because they
: dramatically reduced your competitors on the job market. If Americans are
: working as hard as WW2 era, you and me would be lucky to be bus boys in
: chinese restaurants.
| b*******r
发帖数: 6655 | 8 only 40% of Americans receive paychecks from private sector. Most people
rely on government handout, stamp, voucher or contract. We are at their
mercy, my dear friend.
【在 n*****g 的大作中提到】
: It is the system that makes them lazy bones. Most of people on this
: board with US citizenship will continue to live and work in US. I
: bet no one wants to compete for the job of Food Stamp distributor
: in the future since that will be the only job available if we keep
: voting for the Party of Food Stamps. Well you can not even compete
: for that job since you may not be member of the "Food Stamp Distributor
: Union".
: Majority of Americans still prefer a paycheck. It is more like 75%
: regular honoest workers vs 25% ellites plus the lazy bones you refer to.
: There are more of us than them. Use your ballot to make a difference
| B******e
发帖数: 5730 | 9 原来多数美国人是在国企，州企，乡村公社工作啊
我们逃离了一个社会主义，却跳进另一个社会主义的怀抱
看来，共产主义是人类必达的目的
LOL
【在 b*******r 的大作中提到】
: only 40% of Americans receive paychecks from private sector. Most people
: rely on government handout, stamp, voucher or contract. We are at their
: mercy, my dear friend.
| d******8
发帖数: 1795 | 10 everyone should receive food stamps.
then, USA is a communist country, and
we are all in heaven. | y********o
发帖数: 9263 | 11 mark
The 2010 election is fundamentally different from other elections
in the past which may have focused on social issues such as gay marriage,
abortion, "hope" & "change". The 2010 election is going to decide America's
economic future for the next 30 years even longer. If we make wrong choice,
US will become a third world country and whatever you cared about may get
lost forever.
The choice is very clear, do you vote for the Party of Paycheck or
the Party of Food Stamps?
40 Million US population are already on Food Stamps, highest point in US
history. It is NOT Bush's fault. Nancy Pelosi claimed that Food Stamp
gives best bang for the buck. The more the better. Do you really want
to keep her the real witch 2nd-in-line to US presidency?
I bet most of your health insurance premium will go up in 2011. It will
keep increasing every year until 2018 when Obamacare fully kicks in. Please
do not blame your CEO for laying off workers, if he/she does not, the whole
company will go down like GM.
The Party of Food Stamps want to keep you on food stamps so that those
ellites can keep ripping off tax payers for their own benefit -- Just like
they intentionally keep black community in poverty so that they keep voting
for Dems.
Enough is enough. Government does not create jobs, business creates jobs.It
is time to go back to fundamental and let people in charge of their own
destination.
If you are a hardworking American, please vote for your own benefit, vote
for the Party of Paycheck. We the people will win on Nov 2, 2010.
【在 n*****g 的大作中提到】
: The 2010 election is fundamentally different from other elections
: in the past which may have focused on social issues such as gay marriage,
: abortion, "hope" & "change". The 2010 election is going to decide America's
: economic future for the next 30 years even longer. If we make wrong choice,
: US will become a third world country and whatever you cared about may get
: lost forever.
: The choice is very clear, do you vote for the Party of Paycheck or
: the Party of Food Stamps?
: 40 Million US population are already on Food Stamps, highest point in US
: history. It is NOT Bush's fault. Nancy Pelosi claimed that Food Stamp
|
|
