|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j****8
发帖数: 35 | 1 如果你对以下问题有亲身经验或知道答案的，请分享，先谢了∶
1) 交通意外上法庭法官或陪审团是如果计谁错谁对的？是以百分比计算，或是多于9/12过才算？
2) 被告方可以将自己的撞车损失也拿出来吗？万一原告输了原告可能也要付被告撞车损失？
3) 原告的 "demand for settlement"在被告保险限额之内，但保险公司跟原告谈判失败，如果原告在法庭要求多于保险限额的钱，被告要不要自己付钱？还是保险公司会付超过保险限额的钱？
4) 如果server失败，找不到人，下一步会是什么？找不到人可上庭吗？
5) 没人证的交通意外，而police report也没定论的交通意外，会如何判？每人一半责任？
6) 保险之间arbitration失败而请律师去告人赢数会高吗？
7) 原告有健康保险，车的损失也在自己保险公司拿了，如果再去告对方，是否意味着有钱赚？原告如果赢了，要还钱自己健康保险公司和车保险公司？不给可以吗？ | c**d
发帖数: 3888 | 2 1. California is a comparative fault state. Pure percentage
2. Defendant MUST file a counterclaim at the beginning of the lawsuit.
There's a very narrow window.
3. Defendant will have to pay the amount that's over the coverage from his
own pocket
4. Defendant must be served properly. The defendant may be able to dodge
service for a while, but his insurance company can't.
5. No. Plaintiff's evidence must be stronger than the defendant's in order
to collect anything. If the evidence is 50/50, plaintiff gets nothing.
6. No conclusion based on the facts you provided.
7. The money will go to the insurance company first. Plaintiff cannot
collect more than his loss. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
