c******n
发帖数: 4965 | 1 some companies pay quite a high portion of their compensation in stocks,
why not just pay in salary? these companies vest every year, it's not like
that they want to keep u using stocks
(my first job had RSU vest in 3 years, that I can see the point of stocks,
but if it pays out every year, there is really not much difference ...) | f******o
发帖数: 1505 | | c******n
发帖数: 4965 | 3 how ? company pays less tax?
【在 f******o 的大作中提到】
: tax deduction
| l**t
发帖数: 6971 | 4
To better align your financial interests with the company's.
【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: some companies pay quite a high portion of their compensation in stocks,
: why not just pay in salary? these companies vest every year, it's not like
: that they want to keep u using stocks
: (my first job had RSU vest in 3 years, that I can see the point of stocks,
: but if it pays out every year, there is really not much difference ...)
| s**x
发帖数: 7506 | 5 in the old good days, stocks cost company $0. now the new accouting rules
have to follow, really not good. | f******o
发帖数: 1505 | 6 Still much better than paying salary, tax-wise for the company
【在 s**x 的大作中提到】
: in the old good days, stocks cost company $0. now the new accouting rules
: have to follow, really not good.
| l*****k
发帖数: 1059 | 7 compensation incl. cash (base + bonus/commission), equity, and benefits
equity is desired for retention, thus usually requires a vesting plan.
【在 f******o 的大作中提到】
: Still much better than paying salary, tax-wise for the company
|
|
