由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
SanFrancisco版 - 反 SCA-5 , 反种族歧视,捍卫宪法第十四修正案(平权)
相关主题
ZZ 如何废除SCA5APAPA SCA 5 at the Educational Town Hall
部分加州众议员联系方式北加众议院议员联系方式[请版主顶置]
只需要保证 2 个民主党议员投票反对歧视法案SCA5逐条讨论SCA-5
反SCA5, 练口语 (转载)Darkest day in California's recent history of politics[zt]
湾区的4个Assembly Member反SCA5:本周六Palo Alto附近的居民可以做的事
请加州同胞给本地州议员发信反对SCA5 (转载)教育部关于种族自我认定的规定
加州的父母们,你们要不打电话也太对不起自己的娃了!印度裔初中生的一篇反SCA5的Blog
SCA5: 给议员打电话记录再给大家提供些弹药:Is SCA-5 really about diversity?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: sca话题: suite话题: california话题: ca话题: 亚裔
进入SanFrancisco版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
z*****n
发帖数: 151
1
http://blog.wenxuecity.com/myblog/45394/201402/12324.html
华人作为绝对的少数,唯一能保护我们的,是伟大的美国宪法!
My dear friends,
In my humble opinion, 1/30/2014 marked the darkest day in California’s
recent history of politics. On this day, the California Senate
overwhelmingly (27:9) approved SCA-5 http://legiscan.com/CA/bill/SCA5/2013, which would appeal provisions of Prop 209 and allow the State of California to discriminate an individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin.
In the 18 years that Prop 209 has been in effect, California has become the
most diversified state in the US. Also, comprehensive measures were
introduced to help students from disadvantaged families to obtain high
education, which have my full support. Now SCA-5 seeks to roll back the
clock to unfairly punish Asians simply based on race. The 14th Amendment of
the US Constitution clearly states that no state shall deny to any person
within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The SCA-5 is wrong
and in violation of the US Constitution.
As a beneficiary of the Prop 209, in just a few years of career life, I have
directed works that brought tens of millions of dollars of revenues into
California, helped to create/maintain hundreds of jobs benefiting all
ethnical groups, with a lot more down the road. However, some day, my
children might tell me: “Dad, I lost the opportunity simply because of the
color of my skin.” Not to mention that a student from a disadvantaged
Asian family could lose nearly all opportunities to pursue any "American
Dream".
Currently, the bill is at the California Assembly. I hereby urge you to
call your representative at the Assembly http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/; http://assembly.ca.gov/assemblymembers) to vote no on SAC-5. I will also deeply appreciate if you could help spreading the words.
Thanks and best regards,
请上Facebook 支持:https://www.facebook.com/SayNoToSCA5
阅读民权活动家的评论: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-gratz-california-racial-preferences-20140207,0,3994041.story#ixzz2szI8tOKx
组织起来反对种族歧视!
华人欢庆新年之际,SCA-5 号提案却给欢乐中的亚裔们浇了一盆冷水:此提案已在1/30
/2014参议院(State Senator)27票赞成,9票 http://legiscan.com/CA/bill/SCA5/2013 下一步即将提到州众议院投票。此提案如果在州众议会(State Assembly)获得通过,将於今年11月公投,决定是否恢复在加大校园中实行所谓的以种族等为标准划界的入学措施。鉴于目前加大(UC)各校亚裔学生比例,远超过加州亚裔人口比例,一旦公投通过,加大亚裔入学人数势必受到排挤。各级亚裔民意代表与民权团体,应尽速表明反对立场,勿使亚裔子弟成为种族歧视的牺牲品。
美国宪法第14修正案明确规定,任何州都不可以立法拒绝对所有公民的平等保护。SCA-
5 是错误并违反美国宪法的,是一个赤裸裸的种族歧视的法案。
加州於1996年通过209提案,成为全美第一个州禁止公立大学以种族决定入学,政府也
不可以种族为聘用标准。此后,加州发展成为美国最为种族多样化的州。亚裔为加州和
美国的发展做出了至关重要的贡献,为加州带来数以亿万计的收入,给加州的各族裔带
来了数以百千万计的工作机会。但是,尽管我们做出了巨大贡献,SCA-5 仍然将使我们
的后代面临仅仅因为肤色而失去机会的危险。受伤最深的,将是贫寒的亚裔家庭,几乎
所有的“美国梦”都将对他们关闭,仅仅因为他们的肤色。
目前,加州众议院的80席中,有55席民主党,25席共和党。对这个法案的支持,党派分
明:民主党同意而共和党反对。通过这个法案,需要54票。我们只需要保证 2 个以上
民主党议员勇敢地站出来,投票反对,我们就可以让法案胎死腹中。
**现在我们可以做的是写信给代表我们选区的加州众议员,去他们的网站给他们写
Email,请他们反对 SCA-5
http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/; http://assembly.ca.gov/assemblymembers
以下是有可能帮助我们亚裔的民主党议员。如有在选区内的,务必打电话,或去办公室
造访!
------------------------------------------
第49区(Monterey Park , Arcadia附近地区) Ed Chau (周立本)
1255 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 306, Monterery Park, CA 91754;
(323) 264-4949 http://asmdc.org/members/a49/
-------------------------------------------
第28区(Cupertino附近地区) Paul Fong(方文忠)
2105 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 160, Campbell, CA 95008;
(408) 371-2802 http://www.asmdc.org/members/a28/
-------------------------------------------
第24区(Los Altos附近地区) Rich Gordon
5050 El Camino Real, Suite 117, Los Altos, CA 94022;
(650) 691-2121 http://www.asmdc.org/members/a24/
------------------------------------------
第16区(San Ramon附近地区) Joan Buchanan
2694 Bishop Dr., Suite 275, San Ramon, CA 94583;
(925) 328-1515 http://www.asmdc.org/members/a16/
-------------------------------------------
第22区(San Mateo附近地区) Kevin Mullin
1528 South El Camino Real, Suite 302, San Mateo, CA 94022;
(650) 349-2200
-------------------------------------------
第4区(Woodland附近地区) Mariko Yamada
725 Main Street, Suite 206, Woodland, CA 95695;
(530) 662-7867 http://www.asmdc.org/members/a04/?
T******g
发帖数: 21328
2
是的,宪法的精神是自由平等,因为美国开国的那帮人很多是欧洲逃出来的苦逼
第二修正案保证公民拥有武器权也是保证个人自由权利,防止政府权力集中专制的基石
可惜从其他国家特别是亚洲集权国家来的新移民没有这种精神,很容易被民猪党洗脑利
用,把政府当成依靠和主人
1 (共1页)
进入SanFrancisco版参与讨论
相关主题
再给大家提供些弹药:Is SCA-5 really about diversity?湾区的4个Assembly Member
calwatchdog.com,re: 如何早知道sca5这样的法案请加州同胞给本地州议员发信反对SCA5 (转载)
east Palo Alto 和Palo Alto的分界在哪里?加州的父母们,你们要不打电话也太对不起自己的娃了!
有谁对east palo alto 的woodland park apartment了解的??SCA5: 给议员打电话记录
ZZ 如何废除SCA5APAPA SCA 5 at the Educational Town Hall
部分加州众议员联系方式北加众议院议员联系方式[请版主顶置]
只需要保证 2 个民主党议员投票反对歧视法案SCA5逐条讨论SCA-5
反SCA5, 练口语 (转载)Darkest day in California's recent history of politics[zt]
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: sca话题: suite话题: california话题: ca话题: 亚裔