S****r
发帖数: 53 | 1 假设根据物质决定意识，人的意识应存在于人的大脑（或身体）。
如果我们有一种技术可以完全的地复制人的身体（假使做到最基本粒子级的一摸一样）
用下述的方法进行复制，即保证自始至终复制都是镜像复制，使得新的肉体好象是从旧的
中分身分出来的，那么意识是否也一样被复制呢。产生的问题是，"我"现在在这旧的身体
上，当新的身体产生时，"我"也应同时在新的身体上，那么"我"是如何"横跨"两具身体的
呢 | F******n
发帖数: 160 | 2 This is an interesting question in several aspects. The question itself is
quite philosophical, and it is really a sci-fi type of question at the current
time. However, some analysis and criticism could be conducted on this
question from the scientific views and methods.
The essential question you raised is that: how could the two of the same
"self" state in consciousness exist? And, it is confusing that they seem to be
able to co-exist across two physical bodies.
Without too much caution and d | f****n
发帖数: 355 | 3 Your discription is not accurate. Actually, it appears both halves
have conscious (appears means we are not sure because conscious is
a subjective feeling, we can only infer based on observing).
For example, such person sometimes will do things in opposit, like
button his cloth with left hand and unbutton with his right hand at
the same time (remember left/right hand is controlled by right/left
brain seperately). Normally, the left and right halves have enough
communication that such things won' | f****n
发帖数: 355 | 4 How do you define Ling Hun or Soul? If you define Soul and brain
relationship as computer software and hardware, it's possible that
Soul may exist without brain. I mean, after all, you can imagine
defining somebody's soul with a set of equations and initial conditions,
then you can do the calculation on a computer or any physical device (heard
somebody talking about constructing such things with field, magnetic
or whatever, too cool for me to imagine :-).
However, there are people who don't agre
【在 S****r 的大作中提到】
: 假设根据物质决定意识，人的意识应存在于人的大脑（或身体）。
: 如果我们有一种技术可以完全的地复制人的身体（假使做到最基本粒子级的一摸一样）
: 用下述的方法进行复制，即保证自始至终复制都是镜像复制，使得新的肉体好象是从旧的
: 中分身分出来的，那么意识是否也一样被复制呢。产生的问题是，"我"现在在这旧的身体
: 上，当新的身体产生时，"我"也应同时在新的身体上，那么"我"是如何"横跨"两具身体的
: 呢
| F******n
发帖数: 160 | 5 It's OK. I think the difference between your opinion ad mine lies in the quite
philosophical aspect. Forgive me that I mistakenly assumed you have the same
stand-point on this philosophical belief. My belief is that:
~~~~~~
* observations and rational analysis and methods are the only way for human
being to reach the problems in this world.
* beyond experience and observations, the methods and analysis can be
conducted only with certain |
|
