t****r
发帖数: 702 | 1 Except those keynote speakers and invited talks, JSM basically accept everyt
hing as long as you can provide the proof of the progress of your work.
At least for everyone I know, including myself, hasn't been turned down by
JSM once....
As for the Proceeding of JSM, you need to pay $90+ to publish your work,
which Ithink I will never submit my work to if I think it is publishable
somewhere else... | s*****r
发帖数: 790 | 2 I know. but I thought at least somebody will peek at the submissions. you
can't let sh*t on the table, right?
everyt
【在 t****r 的大作中提到】
: Except those keynote speakers and invited talks, JSM basically accept everyt
: hing as long as you can provide the proof of the progress of your work.
: At least for everyone I know, including myself, hasn't been turned down by
: JSM once....
: As for the Proceeding of JSM, you need to pay $90+ to publish your work,
: which Ithink I will never submit my work to if I think it is publishable
: somewhere else...
| s*w
发帖数: 329 | 3 JSM is the only chance for ASA to make serious money. It has no incentive to
introduce the peer-review process.
everyt
【在 t****r 的大作中提到】
: Except those keynote speakers and invited talks, JSM basically accept everyt
: hing as long as you can provide the proof of the progress of your work.
: At least for everyone I know, including myself, hasn't been turned down by
: JSM once....
: As for the Proceeding of JSM, you need to pay $90+ to publish your work,
: which Ithink I will never submit my work to if I think it is publishable
: somewhere else...
| T*******I
发帖数: 5138 | 4 前不久有个数学大牛人把自己的研究成果贴在自己的网上博客里，而邱大人组织了几个
人把那位niu人的东西给改进了一下发在正式刊物里，结果，你猜最后是谁获得了菲尔
茨奖？
I like the JSM proceedings because it does not have any censor. It is a truely free forum in the field of Statistics. Once it setup a censoring system, it will go to death thus many new ideas will go to death, and the judge is a group of men/women but not the God.
So, for any great idea, it doesn't care where it is appeared.
【在 t****r 的大作中提到】
: Except those keynote speakers and invited talks, JSM basically accept everyt
: hing as long as you can provide the proof of the progress of your work.
: At least for everyone I know, including myself, hasn't been turned down by
: JSM once....
: As for the Proceeding of JSM, you need to pay $90+ to publish your work,
: which Ithink I will never submit my work to if I think it is publishable
: somewhere else...
| f*******s
发帖数: 57 | 5 First, you are not Perelman; second nobody will be your Yau; third, Perelman
's work has been peer-reviewed and accepted, while yours rejected by every
decent journal. Please stop spaming this place with your non-sense, we had
enough of it. I really don't understand what motivates you to keep doing
this since apparently you have nothing to gain but everything to lose. Your
behavior doesn't make any sense in whatever perspective.
truely free forum in the field of Statistics. Once it setup a censoring
system, it will go to death thus many new ideas will go to death, and the
judge is a group of men/women but not the God.
【在 T*******I 的大作中提到】
: 前不久有个数学大牛人把自己的研究成果贴在自己的网上博客里，而邱大人组织了几个
: 人把那位niu人的东西给改进了一下发在正式刊物里，结果，你猜最后是谁获得了菲尔
: 茨奖？
: I like the JSM proceedings because it does not have any censor. It is a truely free forum in the field of Statistics. Once it setup a censoring system, it will go to death thus many new ideas will go to death, and the judge is a group of men/women but not the God.
: So, for any great idea, it doesn't care where it is appeared.
| j*******y
发帖数: 58 | 6 it is a party.每个人都可以唱一曲，不管你唱的好不好，关键是你不能唱儿歌。大家
都能听到不同的歌。
everyt
【在 t****r 的大作中提到】
: Except those keynote speakers and invited talks, JSM basically accept everyt
: hing as long as you can provide the proof of the progress of your work.
: At least for everyone I know, including myself, hasn't been turned down by
: JSM once....
: As for the Proceeding of JSM, you need to pay $90+ to publish your work,
: which Ithink I will never submit my work to if I think it is publishable
: somewhere else...
|
|
