l******9
发帖数: 38 | |
s*****a
发帖数: 2006 | |
o*********l
发帖数: 1807 | 3 everything under 5 is consider junk. |
m*********y
发帖数: 10616 | 4 超过10块钱的全是垃圾。
【在 l******9 的大作中提到】
: 如题，能不能给一些例子呢？或者怎样找到垃圾股？
|
s*****l
发帖数: 1265 | 5 主席，人家是认真在问
【在 m*********y 的大作中提到】
: 超过10块钱的全是垃圾。
|
J******s
发帖数: 913 | 6 Only stupid investors use PPS to judge the potential of a stock.
【在 o*********l 的大作中提到】
: everything under 5 is consider junk.
|
m*********y
发帖数: 10616 | 7 是啊，俺是认真在答阿，我一向不同意所谓垃圾股的说法。那都是losers编出来吓唬后
来人的。股票，只有两种，让你赚钱，和让你赔钱的股票，让你赚钱的就是好的，让你
赔钱的就是垃圾，价格再高，再绩优，有什么用？你的钞票还不是流进了别人的腰包！
【在 s*****l 的大作中提到】
: 主席，人家是认真在问
|
r*****g
发帖数: 7139 | 8 新年你欠包子没发（pet版),又到这儿起哄来了？
【在 s*****l 的大作中提到】
: 主席，人家是认真在问
|
b********y
发帖数: 5829 | 9 一般5块钱以下的股票是垃圾股，当然这只是一个称号而已，没人说垃圾股就不能炒。
【在 m*********y 的大作中提到】
: 是啊，俺是认真在答阿，我一向不同意所谓垃圾股的说法。那都是losers编出来吓唬后
: 来人的。股票，只有两种，让你赚钱，和让你赔钱的股票，让你赚钱的就是好的，让你
: 赔钱的就是垃圾，价格再高，再绩优，有什么用？你的钞票还不是流进了别人的腰包！
|
m*********y
发帖数: 10616 | 10 这个称号是谁定的呢？
【在 b********y 的大作中提到】
: 一般5块钱以下的股票是垃圾股，当然这只是一个称号而已，没人说垃圾股就不能炒。
|
|
|
c********t
发帖数: 4527 | 11 so called penny stocks, only a way to reflect the price is cheap, pennies.
However, penny stocks do have a lot of downside/risks. Let's be realistic.
I am a gambler myself, love potential.
But you gotta admit the risk of penny stocks are higher unless you are so
biased (or stupid).
penny stock are more easily to be manipulated as the price/value is low. A
lot of fish has the power to do so, and they will do so to suck blood from
small fish. For example, definitely trust (rely on) much much less
【在 b********y 的大作中提到】
: 一般5块钱以下的股票是垃圾股，当然这只是一个称号而已，没人说垃圾股就不能炒。
|
b********y
发帖数: 5829 | 12 约定俗成的呗，主要原因还是很多低价股公司都濒临破产吧
【在 m*********y 的大作中提到】
: 这个称号是谁定的呢？
|
J******s
发帖数: 913 | 13 If stock X is at $1000/share, but the market cap is $10m and trading volume
is only 1000 shares/day
and
another stock Y is only $1/share, but the market cap is $10b and trading
volume is 1 billion shares/day.
Which one is more easily manipulated? So PPS is not what you should look at
when taking about manipulation. |
J******s
发帖数: 913 | 14 If one company X is at $1/share, but it has cash of $10/share and is earning
$1/share each year.
and
another company Y is trading at $1000/share, but it has a load of debt and is
still losing money.
Which one is more likely to BK? So PPS is not what you should look at when
talking about BK.
【在 b********y 的大作中提到】
: 约定俗成的呗，主要原因还是很多低价股公司都濒临破产吧
|
b*******e
发帖数: 6389 | 15 $1000的股票流动性太低，对正常公司没有好处，一般会split。而老巴的公司就是为了
限制流动性所以不拆分股票，一股几万美元。
Citi的盘子再大也是垃圾股，不赚钱嘛。
volume
at
【在 J******s 的大作中提到】
: If stock X is at $1000/share, but the market cap is $10m and trading volume
: is only 1000 shares/day
: and
: another stock Y is only $1/share, but the market cap is $10b and trading
: volume is 1 billion shares/day.
: Which one is more easily manipulated? So PPS is not what you should look at
: when taking about manipulation.
|
T*******x
发帖数: 72 | 16 中立的说：垃圾股是机构的定义，垃圾股就是机构“还”不感兴趣的股。
（TraderRex对垃圾股的定义是：所有七元以下的股，或者曾经从最高点跌下超过90%的股，因为他们让机构伤过一次心了，绝大多数情况机构会记仇的） |
d******e
发帖数: 6945 | 17 如果主席股龄不超过两年的话，真的是少见的有悟性的人。
未来的名菜大牛。 |
c********t
发帖数: 4527 | 18 don't use special cases on general elaboration.
Be care of your logic.
earning
is
【在 J******s 的大作中提到】
: If one company X is at $1/share, but it has cash of $10/share and is earning
: $1/share each year.
: and
: another company Y is trading at $1000/share, but it has a load of debt and is
: still losing money.
: Which one is more likely to BK? So PPS is not what you should look at when
: talking about BK.
|
b*******e
发帖数: 6389 | 19 问：A是什么
答：A就是B定义的。
这样可以么？
【在 d******e 的大作中提到】
: 如果主席股龄不超过两年的话，真的是少见的有悟性的人。
: 未来的名菜大牛。
|
c********t
发帖数: 4527 | 20 don't use special cases on general elaboration.
Be care of your logic.
earning
is
【在 J******s 的大作中提到】
: If one company X is at $1/share, but it has cash of $10/share and is earning
: $1/share each year.
: and
: another company Y is trading at $1000/share, but it has a load of debt and is
: still losing money.
: Which one is more likely to BK? So PPS is not what you should look at when
: talking about BK.
|
|
|
d******e
发帖数: 6945 | 21 我没有看明白你的逻辑。-：）
【在 b*******e 的大作中提到】
: 问：A是什么
: 答：A就是B定义的。
: 这样可以么？
|
b*******e
发帖数: 6389 | 22 我回错地方了，呵呵。
【在 d******e 的大作中提到】
: 我没有看明白你的逻辑。-：）
|
J******s
发帖数: 913 | 23 do not use general elaboration to exclude special case.
【在 c********t 的大作中提到】
: don't use special cases on general elaboration.
: Be care of your logic.
:
: earning
: is
|
c********t
发帖数: 4527 | 24 you don't have common sense.
No argument with you though.
【在 J******s 的大作中提到】
: do not use general elaboration to exclude special case.
|
J******s
发帖数: 913 | 25 You do not have logic!
I made it very clear that people should NOT just use PPS to judge a stock.
There are many good low-price stocks that are fundamentally solid. They have
cash but not debt, they are earning money, they have decent market caps,
and they are actively traded.
2010 is the year to find good PICKs. Let us compare the performance of our
portfolios in the end of 2010, and see who is wise.
【在 c********t 的大作中提到】
: you don't have common sense.
: No argument with you though.
|
L********3
发帖数: 2272 | 26 jade daniu, long time no see, happy new year! You must gain alot in the last
year.
【在 J******s 的大作中提到】
: do not use general elaboration to exclude special case.
|
J******s
发帖数: 913 | 27 Good to see you too. I took a vacation in Florida in the end of 2009.
I did OK last year. As a new investor, I made many mistakes and lost a lot
on the market crash. Since the March bottom, I almost gained +300%.
I should be more conservative in 2010, and pick stocks with good risk/reward
ratios. My target is to at least double my portfolio as long as the market
does not crash again.
last
【在 L********3 的大作中提到】
: jade daniu, long time no see, happy new year! You must gain alot in the last
: year.
|
T*******x
发帖数: 72 | 28 牛人牛帖，mark 了。
reward
market
【在 J******s 的大作中提到】
: Good to see you too. I took a vacation in Florida in the end of 2009.
: I did OK last year. As a new investor, I made many mistakes and lost a lot
: on the market crash. Since the March bottom, I almost gained +300%.
: I should be more conservative in 2010, and pick stocks with good risk/reward
: ratios. My target is to at least double my portfolio as long as the market
: does not crash again.
:
: last
|
o*********l
发帖数: 1807 | 29 Most funds will not hold stock below $5 that is why I say they are junk.
However, there are growth stocks out of junk but mostly are junk. There are
many reasons for institutions and funds to not hold stock that are below $5,
I am not making this one up. |
