i*u
发帖数: 299 | | u********e
发帖数: 4950 | 2 According to your charts, it seems like that you believe that the market
would also have a big 4-5 wave to push the SPX above 1370.
Hope you are right.
Nice charts and calculations! | i*u
发帖数: 299 | 3 won't be a BIG one, since we have an extended wave 1, that means wave 5's
length is going to equal or less than wave 3 because, by definition, wave 3
never be the shortest.
【在 u********e 的大作中提到】
: According to your charts, it seems like that you believe that the market
: would also have a big 4-5 wave to push the SPX above 1370.
: Hope you are right.
: Nice charts and calculations!
| k*****y
发帖数: 16 | 4 Nice charts. Want to see more analyses. | i*u
发帖数: 299 | 5 读者们请注意了！
刚想回来一个Elliott Wave定义，差点忘了！
就是wave 4 correction never overlapped wave 1's territory, which is 1219.80。
所以最下那个图的算法不可能实现，否则整个idea就是个failure。 |
|
