S*******n
发帖数: 10009 | |
C*****5
发帖数: 8812 | 2 哥前几天迎着某机构的冷眼和嘲笑第一个喊出2950点。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/36573651_3.html
【在 S*******n 的大作中提到】
: 正在上攻3000
|
S*******n
发帖数: 10009 | 3 但还没到
【在 C*****5 的大作中提到】
: 哥前几天迎着某机构的冷眼和嘲笑第一个喊出2950点。
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/36573651_3.html
|
C*****5
发帖数: 8812 | 4 我喊的时候是200点以前了，给点鼓励行不行。
是没到。估计快了。
【在 S*******n 的大作中提到】
: 但还没到
|
S*******n
发帖数: 10009 | 5 不怕3000是顶？
【在 C*****5 的大作中提到】
: 我喊的时候是200点以前了，给点鼓励行不行。
: 是没到。估计快了。
|
C*****5
发帖数: 8812 | 6 这个你无需担心。哥虽然人生观端正，不招中崩党喜欢，操盘能力那是杠杠的。
4000->2900哥是+5%。
哥前几天刚把目标位提到到3050。但是说了3000点以上可以预防性减仓。
【在 S*******n 的大作中提到】
: 不怕3000是顶？
|
s**t
发帖数: 17016 | 7 A股肯定还要崩。楼市这么火，要是再火一阵子，股市里的钱就会挪窝
【在 S*******n 的大作中提到】
: 正在上攻3000
|
I*0
发帖数: 4200 | 8 看你如此亢奋，与你天天自夸的大牛身份不符啊
：正在上攻3000
【在 S*******n 的大作中提到】
: 不怕3000是顶？
|
i******r
发帖数: 1175 | 9 4000->2700, you were +1%, now you are 5% up, 100% in A share allocation
since when?
If you can stay 1% up in a down market from 4000->2700, you are mostly not
participating, which does NOT look like so. Now magically, you managed to
allocate 100% recently, what a clown!
Even if you just on average dipped 10% position from 4000-2700, you are
still down 3%+, unless you shorted the market. You could argue that you day-
trade against a trend (and somehow managed to miss all these down days), the
chance of loss is even bigger. And you allocated
100% to day-trade, and against the trend?
Even if you magically added 90% at the short-term bottom of 2700, you are
still way short of 5%. Of course, you can always count your winning
positions only.
Next time post your position with allocation (can we assume you are 100% for
your accounts made for A share trading?), or you are just a joke and don't
bother to show up.
【在 C*****5 的大作中提到】
: 这个你无需担心。哥虽然人生观端正，不招中崩党喜欢，操盘能力那是杠杠的。
: 4000->2900哥是+5%。
: 哥前几天刚把目标位提到到3050。但是说了3000点以上可以预防性减仓。
|
C*****5
发帖数: 8812 | 10 几天前就贴了交易记录。自己不考古，洋洋洒洒写了这么多。你写的累，这英语我看着
也累。
day-
the
【在 i******r 的大作中提到】
: 4000->2700, you were +1%, now you are 5% up, 100% in A share allocation
: since when?
: If you can stay 1% up in a down market from 4000->2700, you are mostly not
: participating, which does NOT look like so. Now magically, you managed to
: allocate 100% recently, what a clown!
: Even if you just on average dipped 10% position from 4000-2700, you are
: still down 3%+, unless you shorted the market. You could argue that you day-
: trade against a trend (and somehow managed to miss all these down days), the
: chance of loss is even bigger. And you allocated
: 100% to day-trade, and against the trend?
|
|
|
i******r
发帖数: 1175 | 11 You posted trades, not allocations, if you buy 1%, up 100%, that's only 1%
up.Show your allocations, or your trades are just fabricated BS. Your
allocation was 10%, and now you are 100%? since when?
【在 C*****5 的大作中提到】
: 几天前就贴了交易记录。自己不考古，洋洋洒洒写了这么多。你写的累，这英语我看着
: 也累。
:
: day-
: the
|
x*********n
发帖数: 28013 | 12 我在4000点的时候扔掉了30% 的gain+ 20%原有资金。
然后大盘跌15%以后买回5%，然后average down。在3100点all in。
2850点的时候我还有2万 gain，2800一跌破只有8000，当天全割肉了。
他那个4000-2700还赚1%就是小概率在最高点扔掉97%以上仓位，一直不加直到2700再
all in，扣掉DT起码需要4000扔掉90%，2700买回。very unlikely。
active profolio manage不可能这样。
day-
the
【在 i******r 的大作中提到】
: 4000->2700, you were +1%, now you are 5% up, 100% in A share allocation
: since when?
: If you can stay 1% up in a down market from 4000->2700, you are mostly not
: participating, which does NOT look like so. Now magically, you managed to
: allocate 100% recently, what a clown!
: Even if you just on average dipped 10% position from 4000-2700, you are
: still down 3%+, unless you shorted the market. You could argue that you day-
: trade against a trend (and somehow managed to miss all these down days), the
: chance of loss is even bigger. And you allocated
: 100% to day-trade, and against the trend?
|
C*****5
发帖数: 8812 | 13 爱信就信，不信拉到。哥不欠你一分一毛，没有义务一笔一笔算给你听知道吗？一点
人事儿都不懂。jeez...
【在 i******r 的大作中提到】
: You posted trades, not allocations, if you buy 1%, up 100%, that's only 1%
: up.Show your allocations, or your trades are just fabricated BS. Your
: allocation was 10%, and now you are 100%? since when?
|
s******Y
发帖数: 2085 | 14 A股迟早要崩， 熊哥把话撂下。
高手能抓反弹， 其他人都被套在反弹。
【在 S*******n 的大作中提到】
: 正在上攻3000
|
C*****5
发帖数: 8812 | 15 某机构继续惊呼不可思议。哥这么总结没有曲解你的意思吧？
【在 x*********n 的大作中提到】
: 我在4000点的时候扔掉了30% 的gain+ 20%原有资金。
: 然后大盘跌15%以后买回5%，然后average down。在3100点all in。
: 2850点的时候我还有2万 gain，2800一跌破只有8000，当天全割肉了。
: 他那个4000-2700还赚1%就是小概率在最高点扔掉97%以上仓位，一直不加直到2700再
: all in，扣掉DT起码需要4000扔掉90%，2700买回。very unlikely。
: active profolio manage不可能这样。
:
: day-
: the
|
i******r
发帖数: 1175 | 16 That's what I say... a loser. Your reading of trend is f*cked up, and how
shameless that you can keep posting here.
【在 C*****5 的大作中提到】
: 爱信就信，不信拉到。哥不欠你一分一毛，没有义务一笔一笔算给你听知道吗？一点
: 人事儿都不懂。jeez...
|
C*****5
发帖数: 8812 | 17 本来想回一句“who the fxxx are you?"
不过想想让你继续在哥膝下打滚也挺喜庆的。
【在 i******r 的大作中提到】
: That's what I say... a loser. Your reading of trend is f*cked up, and how
: shameless that you can keep posting here.
|
i******r
发帖数: 1175 | 18 What a pathetic loser, pretending to have some 1%, and bag holding from 4000
-2700. How pathetic is trying to fabric it to gain some confidence from the
board?
Did it touch your nerve, who the fXXX is pretending?
【在 C*****5 的大作中提到】
: 本来想回一句“who the fxxx are you?"
: 不过想想让你继续在哥膝下打滚也挺喜庆的。
|
C*****5
发帖数: 8812 | 19 哥跑赢大盘挣钱，你悲愤的满地打滚，哥表示无法理解你的行为。
但是哥尊重你的选择。你先滚着。到饭点儿了，哥去叫个外卖。
4000
the
【在 i******r 的大作中提到】
: What a pathetic loser, pretending to have some 1%, and bag holding from 4000
: -2700. How pathetic is trying to fabric it to gain some confidence from the
: board?
: Did it touch your nerve, who the fXXX is pretending?
|
i******r
发帖数: 1175 | 20 What a loser, obviously you started show off the stupidity and 满地打滚.
4000-2700 with 1% up, and up 5% suddenly you fully allocated?
【在 C*****5 的大作中提到】
: 哥跑赢大盘挣钱，你悲愤的满地打滚，哥表示无法理解你的行为。
: 但是哥尊重你的选择。你先滚着。到饭点儿了，哥去叫个外卖。
:
: 4000
: the
|
|
|
t*********3
发帖数: 4304 | 21 这班上，扯鸡巴蛋的太多了。
我不认识CRH，也不喜欢他的帖子口气，但是他的那个+1%到+5%是标准的马前炮帖子，
清清楚楚，怎么就那么多人看不懂别人的交易呢？
看不懂也就罢了，长篇的质疑更是闲的蛋疼。 |
C*****5
发帖数: 8812 | 22 Well，I am NOT going to say I did not make 5% profit trading from 4000 to
2900 just to make you feel better. A fact is a fact. If you can't deal with
it, it ain't my problem.
【在 i******r 的大作中提到】
: What a loser, obviously you started show off the stupidity and 满地打滚.
: 4000-2700 with 1% up, and up 5% suddenly you fully allocated?
|
P***5
发帖数: 1089 | 23 A股还是比较好搞的，4000-2900，我基本保持70%仓位，而且不低于10支个股，总共亏
了4%。这还是放弃“选时”的结果。 |
i******r
发帖数: 1175 | 24 Did you read the allocation? From what he posted, he is fabricating his "win
" in order to fend off the questioning. The only chance is that he did it
fully allocate. What a bullshht that his allocation became 100% at the
bottom? Give me a break. I know most people are nibbling at bottom, but
sudden 100% tells me what a BS that whole story is. What a loser.
【在 t*********3 的大作中提到】
: 这班上，扯鸡巴蛋的太多了。
: 我不认识CRH，也不喜欢他的帖子口气，但是他的那个+1%到+5%是标准的马前炮帖子，
: 清清楚楚，怎么就那么多人看不懂别人的交易呢？
: 看不懂也就罢了，长篇的质疑更是闲的蛋疼。
|
i******r
发帖数: 1175 | 25 There u go, you had 70% allocation and still down 4%. Most people don't
fully allocate if his portfolio is big enough, well he probably can not
afford to have more than 1 position after all.
【在 P***5 的大作中提到】
: A股还是比较好搞的，4000-2900，我基本保持70%仓位，而且不低于10支个股，总共亏
: 了4%。这还是放弃“选时”的结果。
|
