z******j
发帖数: 1265 | 1 我想出来的结果是这样:
ab=...
=...
<=...
=...
=...
我用的命令是：
\begin{eqnarray}
ab & = ..
& = ...
& \leqslant\...
& = ...
& = ..
但是出不来上面的效果，后面三行还是比前两行突出来一点点。怎么修改该？
看了上面写的中文manual了，还是找不到答案。
谢谢大侠! |
c****s
发帖数: 2487 | 2 usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
..... |
z*****n
发帖数: 7639 | 3 usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{align}
ab &= ...
&= ...
&\le ...
\end{align}
【在 z******j 的大作中提到】
: 我想出来的结果是这样:
: ab=...
: =...
: <=...
: =...
: =...
: 我用的命令是：
: \begin{eqnarray}
: ab & = ..
: & = ...
|
b*********n
发帖数: 173 | 4 Nod. \begin{align} is better than \begin{eqnarray}, although the latter is
recommanded in the LaTex Bible
【在 z*****n 的大作中提到】
: usepackage{amsmath}
: \begin{align}
: ab &= ...
: &= ...
: &\le ...
: \end{align}
|
z******j
发帖数: 1265 | |
z******j
发帖数: 1265 | 6 这个好像不用usepackage{}吧？不过\begin{align} works!
谢谢各位大侠！
【在 z*****n 的大作中提到】
: usepackage{amsmath}
: \begin{align}
: ab &= ...
: &= ...
: &\le ...
: \end{align}
|
T*******n
发帖数: 493 | 7 The eqnarray environment in LaTeX has flawed spacing calculations. The LaTeX
developers decided to keep the flaw as a "feature".
The amsmath package provides more useful alignment environments. For a single
equation split over several lines that is to have only one equation number,
use a combination of the "equation" and "split" environments. For aligned
equations each with its own equation number use the "align" environment (use
\notag to suppress any equation number).
The documentation for
【在 b*********n 的大作中提到】
: Nod. \begin{align} is better than \begin{eqnarray}, although the latter is
: recommanded in the LaTex Bible
|
