j**c
发帖数: 234 | 1 4 pm tomorrow, Sept 19, Druild Hill Park, Baltimore, MD.
Men's singles preliminary and women's singles.
4 pm Saturday,Sept 26. Druild Hill Park, Baltimore, MD.
Men's singles final, and mixed doubles |
h*****c
发帖数: 569 | 2 how about the draw-size for men's singles? hehe
less players this year?
【在 j**c 的大作中提到】
: 4 pm tomorrow, Sept 19, Druild Hill Park, Baltimore, MD.
: Men's singles preliminary and women's singles.
: 4 pm Saturday,Sept 26. Druild Hill Park, Baltimore, MD.
: Men's singles final, and mixed doubles
|
j**c
发帖数: 234 | 3 I know. But still 20 players (including 6 IDs from here) for Men's singles.
【在 h*****c 的大作中提到】
: how about the draw-size for men's singles? hehe
: less players this year?
|
w***z
发帖数: 1158 | 4 怎么不早发通知呢？错过报名了，开过去才4小时。呵呵。 |
j**c
发帖数: 234 | 5 刚定下来，现在还可以报名滴，站内联系。也可以下周来打mixed doubles，呵呵。
【在 w***z 的大作中提到】
: 怎么不早发通知呢？错过报名了，开过去才4小时。呵呵。
|
h*****c
发帖数: 569 | 6 预计从4pm到几点啊？ 4个小时奔过来的，估计得考虑住宿问题，:-)
【在 j**c 的大作中提到】
: 刚定下来，现在还可以报名滴，站内联系。也可以下周来打mixed doubles，呵呵。
|
f*********0
发帖数: 886 | 7 Good for you,
Why no Tennis Tournament for Chinese around here? |
f***s
发帖数: 1582 | 8 I will bring a camcord to record some games. Maybe sell some here for baozi.
hehe |
f***s
发帖数: 1582 | 9 You are not going to play?
【在 h*****c 的大作中提到】
: how about the draw-size for men's singles? hehe
: less players this year?
|
h*****c
发帖数: 569 | 10 yes, I am.
sigh,考虑到赛制规则，衷心希望我不会给同组的高手们添乱...呵呵
【在 f***s 的大作中提到】
: You are not going to play?
|
|
|
f***s
发帖数: 1582 | 11 能添乱的话说明你也是高手阿。呵呵。
【在 h*****c 的大作中提到】
: yes, I am.
: sigh,考虑到赛制规则，衷心希望我不会给同组的高手们添乱...呵呵
|
h*****c
发帖数: 569 | 12 虽然不是完全没有道理...但是以那种赛制，像我这样的低手混进去，真的还是很有可
能添乱的。如果没场我都以同样比分 n:9 输了的话还好，但我拿得到的game有个 +/-
1的误差很正常罢，这样引入的噪音还是不容忽视的...
【在 f***s 的大作中提到】
: 能添乱的话说明你也是高手阿。呵呵。
|
p******f
发帖数: 341 | 13 yes. we do. DFW area. You needn't pay attention to local Chinese newspaper,
and see my name? hehe.
There was one ACP and now they play around mid of Sept. which was a week ago
this year at Richardson.
【在 f*********0 的大作中提到】
: Good for you,
: Why no Tennis Tournament for Chinese around here?
|
f***s
发帖数: 1582 | 14 哈哈。就没想过赢球吗？的确这个赛制比较容易造假。
-
【在 h*****c 的大作中提到】
: 虽然不是完全没有道理...但是以那种赛制，像我这样的低手混进去，真的还是很有可
: 能添乱的。如果没场我都以同样比分 n:9 输了的话还好，但我拿得到的game有个 +/-
: 1的误差很正常罢，这样引入的噪音还是不容忽视的...
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 15 What is the 赛制?
【在 f***s 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈。就没想过赢球吗？的确这个赛制比较容易造假。
:
: -
|
f***s
发帖数: 1582 | 16 1. One set of 9 games. (Not sure 9 is the total number of games played
between the two players or one has to win 9 games first to win).
2. The number of games each player wins will be used to rank that player
within the group. If two players win equal number of games, winner for the
match between the two players rank higher. The top two from each group enter
semi-finals.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: What is the 赛制?
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 17 How many players per group?
the
enter
【在 f***s 的大作中提到】
: 1. One set of 9 games. (Not sure 9 is the total number of games played
: between the two players or one has to win 9 games first to win).
: 2. The number of games each player wins will be used to rank that player
: within the group. If two players win equal number of games, winner for the
: match between the two players rank higher. The top two from each group enter
: semi-finals.
|
f***s
发帖数: 1582 | 18 Two levels of 3.5 and 4.0 for men's singles. At each level, 2 groups and
each group has 5 players as of now.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: How many players per group?
:
: the
: enter
|
j**c
发帖数: 234 | 19 循环赛球打得多一些，淘汰赛有可能一场就没得玩了。
4 盘/人 x 0.5 小时/盘 = 2 小时， 估计 4-7 pm 吧。 7：20 pm 灯亮，愿意继续玩的我奉
陪到底。。。
the
enter
【在 f***s 的大作中提到】
: 1. One set of 9 games. (Not sure 9 is the total number of games played
: between the two players or one has to win 9 games first to win).
: 2. The number of games each player wins will be used to rank that player
: within the group. If two players win equal number of games, winner for the
: match between the two players rank higher. The top two from each group enter
: semi-finals.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 20 So the following scenario applys:
Guy A: 4 wins (all 9:0), 1 loss (0:9).
Guy B: 2 wins (all 9:8), 3 losses (all 8:9).
Guy B ranks higher than Guy A.
【在 f***s 的大作中提到】
: Two levels of 3.5 and 4.0 for men's singles. At each level, 2 groups and
: each group has 5 players as of now.
|
|
|
f***s
发帖数: 1582 | 21 你肘子好了？跟高手打我奉陪做沙袋到底。呵呵。
【在 j**c 的大作中提到】
: 循环赛球打得多一些，淘汰赛有可能一场就没得玩了。
: 4 盘/人 x 0.5 小时/盘 = 2 小时， 估计 4-7 pm 吧。 7：20 pm 灯亮，愿意继续玩的我奉
: 陪到底。。。
:
: the
: enter
|
f***s
发帖数: 1582 | 22 Yes. Maybe should count how many set wins first.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: So the following scenario applys:
: Guy A: 4 wins (all 9:0), 1 loss (0:9).
: Guy B: 2 wins (all 9:8), 3 losses (all 8:9).
: Guy B ranks higher than Guy A.
|
j**c
发帖数: 234 | 23 没全好。。。痛苦中:(
我非常看好你得奖，hehe。
【在 f***s 的大作中提到】
: 你肘子好了？跟高手打我奉陪做沙袋到底。呵呵。
|
j**c
发帖数: 234 | 24 Last year, each set has 9 totoal games (9:0, 6:3, 5:4 ....). It worked out
okay.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: So the following scenario applys:
: Guy A: 4 wins (all 9:0), 1 loss (0:9).
: Guy B: 2 wins (all 9:8), 3 losses (all 8:9).
: Guy B ranks higher than Guy A.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 25 If it's "9 total games in a set" rule:
guy A: 4 wins all 5:4, 1 loss 0:9.
Guy B: 1 win at 5:4, 4 losses 4:5.
or
Guy A: 5 wins (4 x 6:3, 1 x 5:4).
Guy b: 3 wins all 8:2, 2 losses 3:6.
guy B wins.
【在 f***s 的大作中提到】
: Yes. Maybe should count how many set wins first.
|
h*****c
发帖数: 569 | 26 this year it is different, right? a longer set?
【在 j**c 的大作中提到】
: Last year, each set has 9 totoal games (9:0, 6:3, 5:4 ....). It worked out
: okay.
|
j**c
发帖数: 234 | 27 I think it's the same. longer set takes too much time.
right now we have 20 players, each plays against 4 other players in the group, each set about 0.5 hour, so 20x4x0.5/2 = 20 hours total court time.
this is just for men, women has less players but longer set for the court
time.
【在 h*****c 的大作中提到】
: this year it is different, right? a longer set?
|
h*****c
发帖数: 569 | 28 i see. in this way, the duration of each set is well under control
ps: it will be even better controlled, if there is no "deuce", :-)
0.
【在 j**c 的大作中提到】
: I think it's the same. longer set takes too much time.
: right now we have 20 players, each plays against 4 other players in the group, each set about 0.5 hour, so 20x4x0.5/2 = 20 hours total court time.
: this is just for men, women has less players but longer set for the court
: time.
|
f***s
发帖数: 1582 | 29 记号! 我得不了奖你得请我吃饭.
【在 j**c 的大作中提到】
: 没全好。。。痛苦中:(
: 我非常看好你得奖，hehe。
|
t****t
发帖数: 530 | 30 So the courts are reserved this time? Last year matches were going for all
day because courts are not available time to time.
【在 h*****c 的大作中提到】
: i see. in this way, the duration of each set is well under control
: ps: it will be even better controlled, if there is no "deuce", :-)
:
: 0.
|
|
|
j**c
发帖数: 234 | 31 一言为定，你得了奖得请我吃饭。
【在 f***s 的大作中提到】
: 记号! 我得不了奖你得请我吃饭.
|
j**c
发帖数: 234 | 32 that's the point! each set takes approximately same amount of time to minimize the waiting between the sets. I think it's appropriate for round robin format, and yes "no ad" scoring.
【在 h*****c 的大作中提到】
: i see. in this way, the duration of each set is well under control
: ps: it will be even better controlled, if there is no "deuce", :-)
:
: 0.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 33 But with that you may still execute the ranking based on win/lose
first before counting the total games won ah...
In my previous example, guy A winning all 5 matches (6:3, 6:3, 6:3,
6:3, 5:4) should rank higher than guy B who wins 3 matches
(8:1, 8:1, 8:1) and loses 2 matches (3:6, 3:6).
It's just my opinion though. This will encourage people to win
the match instead of going for beautiful scores, hehe.
minimize the waiting between the sets. I think it's appropriate for round
robin format, and
【在 j**c 的大作中提到】
: that's the point! each set takes approximately same amount of time to minimize the waiting between the sets. I think it's appropriate for round robin format, and yes "no ad" scoring.
|
f***s
发帖数: 1582 | 34 这样打得好不好都有盼头了.呵呵.
【在 j**c 的大作中提到】
: 一言为定，你得了奖得请我吃饭。
|
j**c
发帖数: 234 | 35 you are right, this is not a perfect system. it's more like a "quick and
dirty" one;) no pun intended.
1). It's good enough for the preliminary round. the top 2 of each group
advance to the semi-final next week. Good playes usually do advance, so A
and B should both advance to next round.
2). It encorages people to play better and consistent tennis. take your
example, even B lost a set 3:6 early, he could still make up with some 8:1
wins.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: But with that you may still execute the ranking based on win/lose
: first before counting the total games won ah...
: In my previous example, guy A winning all 5 matches (6:3, 6:3, 6:3,
: 6:3, 5:4) should rank higher than guy B who wins 3 matches
: (8:1, 8:1, 8:1) and loses 2 matches (3:6, 3:6).
: It's just my opinion though. This will encourage people to win
: the match instead of going for beautiful scores, hehe.
:
: minimize the waiting between the sets. I think it's appropriate for round
: robin format, and
|
