W****E
发帖数: 251 | 1 和郑洁，晏紫来盘双打应该能赢吧？
5.0发球，抽球的力量应该远远大于这俩个女孩子，速度和耐力也不输她们，赢球的胜
算应该不小，还是根本招架不住，得被这俩女人打的屁滚尿流的败下阵来？
个人觉得晏紫的发球，劫击要好过郑洁，郑太矮，发球无力，但底线控球要强过晏紫。
找两个5.0的男人应该和她们有一拼才对。 |
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 2 I've seen both Zheng/Yan and NTRP 5.0 male players on recorded
videos.
I feel Zheng/Yan is very likely to win (with nearly half points
won by opponents' UE).
【在 W****E 的大作中提到】
: 和郑洁，晏紫来盘双打应该能赢吧？
: 5.0发球，抽球的力量应该远远大于这俩个女孩子，速度和耐力也不输她们，赢球的胜
: 算应该不小，还是根本招架不住，得被这俩女人打的屁滚尿流的败下阵来？
: 个人觉得晏紫的发球，劫击要好过郑洁，郑太矮，发球无力，但底线控球要强过晏紫。
: 找两个5.0的男人应该和她们有一拼才对。
|
h*******s
发帖数: 8454 | 3 想都不要想……
【在 W****E 的大作中提到】
: 和郑洁，晏紫来盘双打应该能赢吧？
: 5.0发球，抽球的力量应该远远大于这俩个女孩子，速度和耐力也不输她们，赢球的胜
: 算应该不小，还是根本招架不住，得被这俩女人打的屁滚尿流的败下阵来？
: 个人觉得晏紫的发球，劫击要好过郑洁，郑太矮，发球无力，但底线控球要强过晏紫。
: 找两个5.0的男人应该和她们有一拼才对。
|
W****E
发帖数: 251 | 4 说实在的，郑洁那种身体条件真的不太适合打网球，1米六出头的个子，短胳膊，短腿
，怎么看也不是打
网球的料，去打乒乓可能倒也勉强。可是她最好成绩能进入前20名，不得不承认她有网
球天赋。多少身
高马大的欧美女孩网球生涯还到不了郑洁的最高排名呢，所以觉得她还是蛮有天份的。 |
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 5 赢了又如何?男的打女的都不好意思跟别人讲.
【在 W****E 的大作中提到】
: 和郑洁，晏紫来盘双打应该能赢吧？
: 5.0发球，抽球的力量应该远远大于这俩个女孩子，速度和耐力也不输她们，赢球的胜
: 算应该不小，还是根本招架不住，得被这俩女人打的屁滚尿流的败下阵来？
: 个人觉得晏紫的发球，劫击要好过郑洁，郑太矮，发球无力，但底线控球要强过晏紫。
: 找两个5.0的男人应该和她们有一拼才对。
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 6 有什么不好意思的？偶要是赢了biok会很高兴的到版上来报喜。
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: 赢了又如何?男的打女的都不好意思跟别人讲.
|
d*******e
发帖数: 589 | 7 I bet on you.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 有什么不好意思的？偶要是赢了biok会很高兴的到版上来报喜。
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 8 那是因为你有自知之明,知道现在肯定赢不了,所以才YY.到了你真的能赢的时候,你就不
会这样认为了.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 有什么不好意思的？偶要是赢了biok会很高兴的到版上来报喜。
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 9 hehe, 偶现在也不是必定输把，偶上次就估计了25%的胜率。
偶觉得只要水平相当，赢了就没什么不好意思的，不管对方是美女、
小孩、老头、孕妇、残疾还是什么。
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: 那是因为你有自知之明,知道现在肯定赢不了,所以才YY.到了你真的能赢的时候,你就不
: 会这样认为了.
|
m*****r
发帖数: 3822 | 10 赞心态
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: hehe, 偶现在也不是必定输把，偶上次就估计了25%的胜率。
: 偶觉得只要水平相当，赢了就没什么不好意思的，不管对方是美女、
: 小孩、老头、孕妇、残疾还是什么。
|
|
|
i*****t
发帖数: 724 | 11 一米五几的都进过世界前十
郑洁也不算夸张
【在 W****E 的大作中提到】
: 说实在的，郑洁那种身体条件真的不太适合打网球，1米六出头的个子，短胳膊，短腿
: ，怎么看也不是打
: 网球的料，去打乒乓可能倒也勉强。可是她最好成绩能进入前20名，不得不承认她有网
: 球天赋。多少身
: 高马大的欧美女孩网球生涯还到不了郑洁的最高排名呢，所以觉得她还是蛮有天份的。
|
d****r
发帖数: 1499 | 12 我觉得基本上是没有任何机会。想想郑/晏和大小威都有一拼。双打不是力量的问题。 |
W****E
发帖数: 251 | 13 在 ihateit 的大作中提到:】
一米五几进过前十女子高手是哪位？ 愿闻其名？
如果属实，看来郑洁还有戏更上一层楼啊:))) |
N*****7
发帖数: 1899 | 14 Male 5.0 combo should have zero chance against WTA top players.
Even in singles, Zheng has a better chance vs average Male 6.0, with
better overall techniques. Low error strong is psycological power.
Techniques are not so clear seens as as speed/power, but when you play
a real match, and a long match, technique matters as the success rate of 90%
vs 95% makes a big difference over many rallies. The point score of the 90%
guy vs 95% gal is more like 70:100, rather than 90:95. Rallying 10% faster
【在 W****E 的大作中提到】
: 和郑洁，晏紫来盘双打应该能赢吧？
: 5.0发球，抽球的力量应该远远大于这俩个女孩子，速度和耐力也不输她们，赢球的胜
: 算应该不小，还是根本招架不住，得被这俩女人打的屁滚尿流的败下阵来？
: 个人觉得晏紫的发球，劫击要好过郑洁，郑太矮，发球无力，但底线控球要强过晏紫。
: 找两个5.0的男人应该和她们有一拼才对。
|
u********w
发帖数: 599 | 15 不知道怎么说你。。。 你看过大满贯吗？
"5.0发球，抽球的力量应该远远大于这俩个女孩子"
【在 W****E 的大作中提到】
: 和郑洁，晏紫来盘双打应该能赢吧？
: 5.0发球，抽球的力量应该远远大于这俩个女孩子，速度和耐力也不输她们，赢球的胜
: 算应该不小，还是根本招架不住，得被这俩女人打的屁滚尿流的败下阵来？
: 个人觉得晏紫的发球，劫击要好过郑洁，郑太矮，发球无力，但底线控球要强过晏紫。
: 找两个5.0的男人应该和她们有一拼才对。
|
W****E
发帖数: 251 | 16
【在 N*****7 的大作中提到】
: Male 5.0 combo should have zero chance against WTA top players.
: Even in singles, Zheng has a better chance vs average Male 6.0, with
: better overall techniques. Low error strong is psycological power.
: Techniques are not so clear seens as as speed/power, but when you play
: a real match, and a long match, technique matters as the success rate of 90%
: vs 95% makes a big difference over many rallies. The point score of the 90%
: guy vs 95% gal is more like 70:100, rather than 90:95. Rallying 10% faster
|
g****h
发帖数: 157 | 17 5.0的完全没有机会。。。
【在 u********w 的大作中提到】
: 不知道怎么说你。。。 你看过大满贯吗？
: "5.0发球，抽球的力量应该远远大于这俩个女孩子"
|
a*****3
发帖数: 507 | 18 Don't forget some of male pros can only serve as high as little bit more
than 100 something (first serve).
【在 W****E 的大作中提到】
: 和郑洁，晏紫来盘双打应该能赢吧？
: 5.0发球，抽球的力量应该远远大于这俩个女孩子，速度和耐力也不输她们，赢球的胜
: 算应该不小，还是根本招架不住，得被这俩女人打的屁滚尿流的败下阵来？
: 个人觉得晏紫的发球，劫击要好过郑洁，郑太矮，发球无力，但底线控球要强过晏紫。
: 找两个5.0的男人应该和她们有一拼才对。
|
d*******e
发帖数: 589 | 19 你多半没看过美国大学男选手的比赛,鉴定完毕!
90%
90%
【在 N*****7 的大作中提到】
: Male 5.0 combo should have zero chance against WTA top players.
: Even in singles, Zheng has a better chance vs average Male 6.0, with
: better overall techniques. Low error strong is psycological power.
: Techniques are not so clear seens as as speed/power, but when you play
: a real match, and a long match, technique matters as the success rate of 90%
: vs 95% makes a big difference over many rallies. The point score of the 90%
: guy vs 95% gal is more like 70:100, rather than 90:95. Rallying 10% faster
|
N*****7
发帖数: 1899 | 20 Explanation?
Do you think two college players in double has a good chance vs WTA top
doubles?
【在 d*******e 的大作中提到】
: 你多半没看过美国大学男选手的比赛,鉴定完毕!
:
: 90%
: 90%
|
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 21 The gap between male and female players tends to be bigger at higher
level.
A 3.0 male is probably equal to a 3.5 female.
A 3.5 male is probably slightly better than a 4.0 female.
A 4.0 male is often better than a 4.5 female.
......
A 6.0 male is often better than a 7.0 female.
That said, the average Div I college player is just a 5.5. So they will
probably have hard time aganst top WTA doubles teams.
【在 N*****7 的大作中提到】
: Explanation?
: Do you think two college players in double has a good chance vs WTA top
: doubles?
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 22 For single and double, the difference might be different. I think in double,
female players might be closer to male than in single.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: The gap between male and female players tends to be bigger at higher
: level.
: A 3.0 male is probably equal to a 3.5 female.
: A 3.5 male is probably slightly better than a 4.0 female.
: A 4.0 male is often better than a 4.5 female.
: ......
: A 6.0 male is often better than a 7.0 female.
: That said, the average Div I college player is just a 5.5. So they will
: probably have hard time aganst top WTA doubles teams.
|
N*****7
发帖数: 1899 | 23 True. That's the ballpark difference.
In addition, two 6.0 male college players, randomly put together,
are not as good as same-level pairs who specialize in doubles. Zheng Jie/Yan
Zi pair has a better chance in score vs two US college 6.0 players.
Yan Zi is a great double specialist, with compact swing and sharp volley.
They two move together well, and are aggressive and precise over net.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: The gap between male and female players tends to be bigger at higher
: level.
: A 3.0 male is probably equal to a 3.5 female.
: A 3.5 male is probably slightly better than a 4.0 female.
: A 4.0 male is often better than a 4.5 female.
: ......
: A 6.0 male is often better than a 7.0 female.
: That said, the average Div I college player is just a 5.5. So they will
: probably have hard time aganst top WTA doubles teams.
|
d*******e
发帖数: 589 | 24 Top College player Single's advantage is bigger than Double, I totally agree
...
In addition, Serve and Volley are the most important skills in doubles, I
did not see those pro female players have any advantage in these two
categories.
double,
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: For single and double, the difference might be different. I think in double,
: female players might be closer to male than in single.
|
