r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | |
w******n
发帖数: 13172 | |
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 3 Why?
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: 4.0
|
j*****A
发帖数: 1395 | |
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 5 你觉得那个3.5？
【在 j*****A 的大作中提到】
: 有4.0 的也有3.5的。
|
d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 6 纠缠这个没什么太大意义，我见过5.0，5。5的比赛比这个还要差。。。
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 你觉得那个3.5？
|
t****i
发帖数: 4225 | 7 你这个有点夸张
其中有几个打的还是不错的，4.5－差不多了。
【在 d******x 的大作中提到】
: 纠缠这个没什么太大意义，我见过5.0，5。5的比赛比这个还要差。。。
|
d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 8 一点也不夸张啊，我亲眼所见。我得知是5。0，5。5的比赛也很震惊，当然大部分的选
手还是很牛的。
【在 t****i 的大作中提到】
: 你这个有点夸张
: 其中有几个打的还是不错的，4.5－差不多了。
|
v***s
发帖数: 1893 | 9 你们那里的5.0，像是高中生比赛？
我们这里可能是4.5 |
j*****A
发帖数: 1395 | 10 第2个录像里第一个发球的可能3.5左右，感觉他正反手只会削球。
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 你觉得那个3.5？
|
|
|
l*******e
发帖数: 583 | |
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 12 原来西部5.0也是很烂.看来只有说自己是西部3.5才有点面子~~
【在 d******x 的大作中提到】
: 一点也不夸张啊，我亲眼所见。我得知是5。0，5。5的比赛也很震惊，当然大部分的选
: 手还是很牛的。
|
v***s
发帖数: 1893 | 13 你们那里的5.0，day2像是高中生比赛？day3 4.0?
day 2 在我们这里可能是4.5 |
z*****u
发帖数: 224 | |
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 15 成人比赛
【在 v***s 的大作中提到】
: 你们那里的5.0，像是高中生比赛？
: 我们这里可能是4.5
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 16 你觉得他们啥level？
【在 z*****u 的大作中提到】
: 比照这个录像 我应该有3.0
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 17 仔细看他的动作。 他是相当强的。
【在 j*****A 的大作中提到】
: 第2个录像里第一个发球的可能3.5左右，感觉他正反手只会削球。
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 18 录像里没我。
猜猜slice的这哥们多大？
【在 l*******e 的大作中提到】
: 你对手正反手都slice?
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 19 1st video:
Asian white shirt: average 4.5
Blue shirt: weak 4.5
Caucasian white shirt: solid 4.5
Gray shirt: weak 5.0
2nd video:
Asian black shirt: same guy as in 1st video (white shirt)
Color shirt: average 4.5
Blue shirt: solid 4.0
Black shirt: solid 4.0
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 录像里没我。
: 猜猜slice的这哥们多大？
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 20 凭啥你们城里人那就自动比我们农村高0.5？太歧视了！
【在 v***s 的大作中提到】
: 你们那里的5.0，day2像是高中生比赛？day3 4.0?
: day 2 在我们这里可能是4.5
|
|
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 21 还是NTRP专家相对靠铺。
White shirt in 1st video is same guy with blue shirt as in 2nd video.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 1st video:
: Asian white shirt: average 4.5
: Blue shirt: weak 4.5
: Caucasian white shirt: solid 4.5
: Gray shirt: weak 5.0
: 2nd video:
: Asian black shirt: same guy as in 1st video (white shirt)
: Color shirt: average 4.5
: Blue shirt: solid 4.0
: Black shirt: solid 4.0
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 22 Uhoh. So all of them must have the same official NTRP level...
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 还是NTRP专家相对靠铺。
: White shirt in 1st video is same guy with blue shirt as in 2nd video.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 23 Aglee with venus, since this is playoff, I'd say 4.5 is the most likely
level.
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 凭啥你们城里人那就自动比我们农村高0.5？太歧视了！
|
v***s
发帖数: 1893 | 24 我丈二和尚啊，要歧视也是低0.5，竞争激烈了而已。
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 凭啥你们城里人那就自动比我们农村高0.5？太歧视了！
|
a**s
发帖数: 9606 | 25 these seems to be USTA playoff matches. Depends on regional,
distric, or sectional, might be 4.0 in sectional or 4.5 in
regional. I just watched the first one, their actual level
should be around 4.5-.
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 还是NTRP专家相对靠铺。
: White shirt in 1st video is same guy with blue shirt as in 2nd video.
|
M*******n
发帖数: 508 | 26 4.0 at most
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 还是NTRP专家相对靠铺。
: White shirt in 1st video is same guy with blue shirt as in 2nd video.
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 27 What would be the least estimation?
【在 M*******n 的大作中提到】
: 4.0 at most
|
g****h
发帖数: 157 | 28 4.0-4.5
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 还是NTRP专家相对靠铺。
: White shirt in 1st video is same guy with blue shirt as in 2nd video.
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 29 This is USTA Sectional.
Day3 is the Secitonal Final.
【在 a**s 的大作中提到】
: these seems to be USTA playoff matches. Depends on regional,
: distric, or sectional, might be 4.0 in sectional or 4.5 in
: regional. I just watched the first one, their actual level
: should be around 4.5-.
|
w******n
发帖数: 13172 | 30 估计是一个level的tournament，所以只看了第一个录像的前几分钟。很明显高于3.5，
因为球速、旋转、线路变化，还有发球都不错。但好像又不足以高到4.5，因为好像都
还是野路子打出来的多，属于野球高手，所以form看着还稍微差点。所以猜4.0
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: Why?
|
|
|
a**s
发帖数: 9606 | 31 then I would guess to be 4.0 sectional final. I do not think
they have chance in national if they were playing 4.5 sectional
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: This is USTA Sectional.
: Day3 is the Secitonal Final.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 32 呼唤answer.
【在 a**s 的大作中提到】
: then I would guess to be 4.0 sectional final. I do not think
: they have chance in national if they were playing 4.5 sectional
|
t****i
发帖数: 4225 | 33 I think the level varies a lot from place to place. In these two videos,
they are about 4.0-4.5, and one or two maybe even less than 4.0. Certainly
there is no strong 4.5.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 呼唤answer.
|
d****r
发帖数: 1499 | 34 4.0~4.5。乍一看有些球比较厉害，但是看几分钟，觉得还是没到5.0那种aggressive的
水平。浅球的杀球能力不够强。不过也有可能上旋厉害我看不出来. |
M*******n
发帖数: 508 | 35 I will reasonably guess it's 3.5 sectional playoff. It's hard to
believe it's 4.0 sectional, serve and form are not that great.
Please at least give some hint like which section this is.
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: This is USTA Sectional.
: Day3 is the Secitonal Final.
|
b*****t
发帖数: 758 | 36 This is stronger than 4.0. I bet it is 4.5 sectional.
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: This is USTA Sectional.
: Day3 is the Secitonal Final.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 37 Of course Pacific Northwestern. LZ is from Seattle.
I can bet with you 2:1 this is not 3.5 sectional. Up to 1000 MIT$.
i.e.,
If this is 3.5, you win MIT$1000.
Otherwise, I win MIT$500.
Please let me know if you'd like to proceed.
Disclaimer: I know nothing about these players or matches.
【在 M*******n 的大作中提到】
: I will reasonably guess it's 3.5 sectional playoff. It's hard to
: believe it's 4.0 sectional, serve and form are not that great.
: Please at least give some hint like which section this is.
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 38 我现在发现看form是比较不靠谱的。其实大部分人都是野路子。Form和水平完全相等不
多。
两周前跟一个刚升到4.5的打。一开始他的form把我吓倒了。他的发球是平底锅式，动
作还不如很多3.0。反手完全是推挡。真比赛才发现，他的发球其实前冲下旋，比一般
的平击和上旋都难接。现在还是没明白平底锅是怎么发出这种球的。而他的反手非常精
确，两个角都可以轻松调动的很好。
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: 估计是一个level的tournament，所以只看了第一个录像的前几分钟。很明显高于3.5，
: 因为球速、旋转、线路变化，还有发球都不错。但好像又不足以高到4.5，因为好像都
: 还是野路子打出来的多，属于野球高手，所以form看着还稍微差点。所以猜4.0
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 39 They are same level.
Certainly
【在 t****i 的大作中提到】
: I think the level varies a lot from place to place. In these two videos,
: they are about 4.0-4.5, and one or two maybe even less than 4.0. Certainly
: there is no strong 4.5.
|
z*****u
发帖数: 224 | 40 第二个录像里一开始穿白色衣服那位选手应该不到4.0吧
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 你觉得他们啥level？
|
|
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 41 Now, you understand why I said MITBBS NTRP~~
其实看form也可以,我一般就是看一样东西:follow through,如果他的follow through非常relax,能够wrap到另外一边,肯定差不到哪去.而且video中,那些人的移动非常灵活,form是不是很漂亮不是很重要了~~
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 我现在发现看form是比较不靠谱的。其实大部分人都是野路子。Form和水平完全相等不
: 多。
: 两周前跟一个刚升到4.5的打。一开始他的form把我吓倒了。他的发球是平底锅式，动
: 作还不如很多3.0。反手完全是推挡。真比赛才发现，他的发球其实前冲下旋，比一般
: 的平击和上旋都难接。现在还是没明白平底锅是怎么发出这种球的。而他的反手非常精
: 确，两个角都可以轻松调动的很好。
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 42 本来刚想公布的。
既然你们俩可能打赌，就等你们定下赌局后就公布。
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Of course Pacific Northwestern. LZ is from Seattle.
: I can bet with you 2:1 this is not 3.5 sectional. Up to 1000 MIT$.
: i.e.,
: If this is 3.5, you win MIT$1000.
: Otherwise, I win MIT$500.
: Please let me know if you'd like to proceed.
: Disclaimer: I know nothing about these players or matches.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 43 直接公布把，他很可能不接，即使接了赢easy money也没什么意思，呵呵。
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 本来刚想公布的。
: 既然你们俩可能打赌，就等你们定下赌局后就公布。
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 44 这是赤果果的挑战呀。
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 直接公布把，他很可能不接，即使接了赢easy money也没什么意思，呵呵。
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 45 比赛录像有20分钟了，大家应该足够仔细判断水平了。
你觉得他们啥水平？
through非常relax,能够wrap到另外一边,肯定差不到哪去.而且video中,那些人的移动
非常灵活,form是不是很漂亮不是很重要了~~
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: Now, you understand why I said MITBBS NTRP~~
: 其实看form也可以,我一般就是看一样东西:follow through,如果他的follow through非常relax,能够wrap到另外一边,肯定差不到哪去.而且video中,那些人的移动非常灵活,form是不是很漂亮不是很重要了~~
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 46 I bet Pacific Northwestern's tennis reputation is ruined if you win.
hahahaha
I assume some people believe these players will be 垫底 in national if they
are in leagues higher than 3.5.
Disclaim: None of the above reflect my personal opinion. hahahaha
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Of course Pacific Northwestern. LZ is from Seattle.
: I can bet with you 2:1 this is not 3.5 sectional. Up to 1000 MIT$.
: i.e.,
: If this is 3.5, you win MIT$1000.
: Otherwise, I win MIT$500.
: Please let me know if you'd like to proceed.
: Disclaimer: I know nothing about these players or matches.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 47 aakk, 你应该搞不过那个灰衣服吧。
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 比赛录像有20分钟了，大家应该足够仔细判断水平了。
: 你觉得他们啥水平？
:
: through非常relax,能够wrap到另外一边,肯定差不到哪去.而且video中,那些人的移动
: 非常灵活,form是不是很漂亮不是很重要了~~
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 48 等aakk发言了你就公布了把。也不会再有多少懂行的发言了阿？
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 比赛录像有20分钟了，大家应该足够仔细判断水平了。
: 你觉得他们啥水平？
:
: through非常relax,能够wrap到另外一边,肯定差不到哪去.而且video中,那些人的移动
: 非常灵活,form是不是很漂亮不是很重要了~~
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 49 一开始我觉得有4.5.但后来发现有裁判,那应该是district或者setional了.能到4.5的
playoff,也应该有weak 5.0了.但好象又不象是5.0.所以很纠结呀.我想水平至少是4.5,
但应该是4.0 sectional吧...
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 比赛录像有20分钟了，大家应该足够仔细判断水平了。
: 你觉得他们啥水平？
:
: through非常relax,能够wrap到另外一边,肯定差不到哪去.而且video中,那些人的移动
: 非常灵活,form是不是很漂亮不是很重要了~~
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 50 ft,每个都比我强~~
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: aakk, 你应该搞不过那个灰衣服吧。
|
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 51 你也太菜了把，好歹也是11:3的4.0，居然一个都打不过。。。
不过偶看好你扁掉那个白衣/兰衣白男，他好像很怕pusher的样子，体力
也不行。
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: ft,每个都比我强~~
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 52 公布答案前，两个小quiz.
1。这四场单打比赛，谁赢了?
2。这里有一个前ATP Pro曾排进世界100。后来退役了。他是谁？他多大了？ |
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 53 其实我没有完全看完,所以不知道你讲的什么衣服呀,总体来说
1.他们都非常年轻
2.他们都非常fit
3.他们都非常灵活
4.form都比我好
那我这一把年纪的wsn身体派还能指望靠什么来赢他们呢?
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 你也太菜了把，好歹也是11:3的4.0，居然一个都打不过。。。
: 不过偶看好你扁掉那个白衣/兰衣白男，他好像很怕pusher的样子，体力
: 也不行。
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 54 1. Asian white.
Gray! (of course!)
Asian black.
Blue.
2. Can only be the slicer. 58?
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 公布答案前，两个小quiz.
: 1。这四场单打比赛，谁赢了?
: 2。这里有一个前ATP Pro曾排进世界100。后来退役了。他是谁？他多大了？
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 55 ft, 你看完就会发现有一个是老爷爷。
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: 其实我没有完全看完,所以不知道你讲的什么衣服呀,总体来说
: 1.他们都非常年轻
: 2.他们都非常fit
: 3.他们都非常灵活
: 4.form都比我好
: 那我这一把年纪的wsn身体派还能指望靠什么来赢他们呢?
|
a**s
发帖数: 9606 | 56 ft! That old guy was ranked <100 pro? Can not believe that.
His ball placement is really nice. I would hate to play with him :P
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 公布答案前，两个小quiz.
: 1。这四场单打比赛，谁赢了?
: 2。这里有一个前ATP Pro曾排进世界100。后来退役了。他是谁？他多大了？
|
M*****l
发帖数: 334 | 57 整天削球的这个可能最难打的一个了。
你看他小球放的多好，绝对是高手一个。
【在 j*****A 的大作中提到】
: 第2个录像里第一个发球的可能3.5左右，感觉他正反手只会削球。
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 58 Wow. KennyD 太强了。Very close to 100% right.
最后一个问题，这六个人里最厉害的是谁？
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 1. Asian white.
: Gray! (of course!)
: Asian black.
: Blue.
: 2. Can only be the slicer. 58?
|
M*****l
发帖数: 334 | 59 看他打球像玩一样，对面那个火力十足，但没处用。。
【在 a**s 的大作中提到】
: ft! That old guy was ranked <100 pro? Can not believe that.
: His ball placement is really nice. I would hate to play with him :P
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 60 ft,我都是跳着来看的.第一场看的片段最多,好象也是第一场最灵活最好,hoho第三场那
深色衣服的也非常好.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: ft, 你看完就会发现有一个是老爷爷。
|
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 61 You know I admire the gray the most.
But this question sounds like a trap... but I have to be honest
with my feeling.
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: Wow. KennyD 太强了。Very close to 100% right.
: 最后一个问题，这六个人里最厉害的是谁？
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 62 啥叫第一场第三场？说第几个video中的左边还是右边？
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: ft,我都是跳着来看的.第一场看的片段最多,好象也是第一场最灵活最好,hoho第三场那
: 深色衣服的也非常好.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 63 第一场就是第一个video的第一个镜头
第三场就是第二个video的第一个镜头
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 啥叫第一场第三场？说第几个video中的左边还是右边？
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 64 你愣没看出来第一场的白衣服和第三场的黑衣服是同一个人？
偶觉得他还行，但是比第二场的灰衣服稍差。
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: 第一场就是第一个video的第一个镜头
: 第三场就是第二个video的第一个镜头
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 65 我愣 :(
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 你愣没看出来第一场的白衣服和第三场的黑衣服是同一个人？
: 偶觉得他还行，但是比第二场的灰衣服稍差。
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 66 这四场：左边的是#1single,右边是#2single. 大家都是把最好的放#1position, 没有
队用田忌赛驴。
1st video white shirt (left court) == 2nd video black shirt (left court)
1st video white shirt (right court) == 2nd video blue shirt (right court)
Quiz 答案：
这四场单打比赛，谁赢了?
1。Asian white shirt (left court)
2。White shirt (right court)
3. Color shirt (left court)
4. Blue shirt (same guy with white shirt of right court in the 1st video)
这里有一个前ATP Pro曾排进世界100。后来退役了。他是谁？他多大了？
Slicer in color shirt. He is 58 years old!
Who is the best of them? |
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 67 1st video gray shirt == 2nd video blue shirt?
How can that be? One Asian one Caucasian. Do you mean
1st video white shirt == 2nd video blue shirt?
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 这四场：左边的是#1single,右边是#2single. 大家都是把最好的放#1position, 没有
: 队用田忌赛驴。
: 1st video white shirt (left court) == 2nd video black shirt (left court)
: 1st video white shirt (right court) == 2nd video blue shirt (right court)
: Quiz 答案：
: 这四场单打比赛，谁赢了?
: 1。Asian white shirt (left court)
: 2。White shirt (right court)
: 3. Color shirt (left court)
: 4. Blue shirt (same guy with white shirt of right court in the 1st video)
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 68 you miss the most interesting answer that all the people here care about.
lol
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 这四场：左边的是#1single,右边是#2single. 大家都是把最好的放#1position, 没有
: 队用田忌赛驴。
: 1st video white shirt (left court) == 2nd video black shirt (left court)
: 1st video white shirt (right court) == 2nd video blue shirt (right court)
: Quiz 答案：
: 这四场单打比赛，谁赢了?
: 1。Asian white shirt (left court)
: 2。White shirt (right court)
: 3. Color shirt (left court)
: 4. Blue shirt (same guy with white shirt of right court in the 1st video)
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 69 改过来了
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 1st video gray shirt == 2nd video blue shirt?
: How can that be? One Asian one Caucasian. Do you mean
: 1st video white shirt == 2nd video blue shirt?
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 70 KennyD, what level would an ex-pro be at age of 58 ?
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: you miss the most interesting answer that all the people here care about.
: lol
|
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 71 Should be barely 5.0.
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: KennyD, what level would an ex-pro be at age of 58 ?
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 72 Missed one place.
"4. Blue shirt (same guy with Gray shirt in the 1st video)"
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 改过来了
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 73 These are USTA PNW 4.5 Sectional match.
Most of them are bumped to 5.0 according to last month ESR. |
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 74 wow! that calculation is good. I thought it would be hard to predict the
level at such old age. But seems it is not far off.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Should be barely 5.0.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 75 According to my 考古 based on the limited information, looks
like this is 4.5 (of course, matching my estimate, LOL).
But there are a few discrepancies I couldn't explain. So let's
wait for radio's official answer.
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: you miss the most interesting answer that all the people here care about.
: lol
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 76 Congratulate myself for 蒙对 again.
Questions: the former pro is Asian or Caucasian? I thought he
was Caucasian from the video.
Also looks like in the first video white shirt Caucasian won
the gray shirt Asian according to the records (doesn't agree
with your answer. Also doesn't match with my estimate, 55555.)
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: These are USTA PNW 4.5 Sectional match.
: Most of them are bumped to 5.0 according to last month ESR.
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 77 wow, deltafox's estimate is the most accurate. Admire.
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: These are USTA PNW 4.5 Sectional match.
: Most of them are bumped to 5.0 according to last month ESR.
|
a**s
发帖数: 9606 | 78 man, lets wait and see how they perform in National :) I bet
they can not win singles :P Is that Wu ... visiting here @_@
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: These are USTA PNW 4.5 Sectional match.
: Most of them are bumped to 5.0 according to last month ESR.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | |
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 80 Former pro is Asian.
Your are right. 1st video right court, white shirt won. I just updated my
answer.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Congratulate myself for 蒙对 again.
: Questions: the former pro is Asian or Caucasian? I thought he
: was Caucasian from the video.
: Also looks like in the first video white shirt Caucasian won
: the gray shirt Asian according to the records (doesn't agree
: with your answer. Also doesn't match with my estimate, 55555.)
|
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 81 Dam. My estimate on the gray guy is way off. I thought he was the
best among the 6... Looks like he is just an average 4.5.
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: Former pro is Asian.
: Your are right. 1st video right court, white shirt won. I just updated my
: answer.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | |
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 83 He should be in the top tier of 4.5 based upon his season record. But just
not 5.0 yet.
The white shirt (1st video right court) is pretty good. He has weapon and
patience.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Dam. My estimate on the gray guy is way off. I thought he was the
: best among the 6... Looks like he is just an average 4.5.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 84 Unfortunately you final prediction was 4.0.
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Tennis/31416119_0.html
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: Why not me :(
: I also think they are 4.5 :P
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 85 hehe, based on my record, I should be strong 4.0, right? but most of people
here still think I am just an entry-level 4.0 :P
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: He should be in the top tier of 4.5 based upon his season record. But just
: not 5.0 yet.
: The white shirt (1st video right court) is pretty good. He has weapon and
: patience.
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 86 venus said day 3 4.0, no?
I did not see your post of 4.5 guess. Instead I saw your evaluation on each
individual. Some estimated as solid 4.5 and some as solid 4.0. Then I assume
your estimate average would be 4.5-.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Why not me or venus?
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Tennis/31415963_0.html
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Tennis/31415985_0.html
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 87 No.
For level, I said they are at least 4.5 - 水平至少是4.5, which I am right.
For the match, I said they are 4.0 sectional, which I am wrong.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Unfortunately you final prediction was 4.0.
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Tennis/31416119_0.html
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 88 aglee. 老啃也不靠铺 :P
each
assume
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: venus said day 3 4.0, no?
: I did not see your post of 4.5 guess. Instead I saw your evaluation on each
: individual. Some estimated as solid 4.5 and some as solid 4.0. Then I assume
: your estimate average would be 4.5-.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 89 Yes, but after radio hinted that this is playoff, I felt 4.5 is
the most likely level.
I originally thought this could be USTA Open where players from
different levels play together.
each
assume
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: venus said day 3 4.0, no?
: I did not see your post of 4.5 guess. Instead I saw your evaluation on each
: individual. Some estimated as solid 4.5 and some as solid 4.0. Then I assume
: your estimate average would be 4.5-.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 90 You are wrong on both accounts.
For level, most of them are 5.0 in the recent ESR.
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: No.
: For level, I said they are at least 4.5 - 水平至少是4.5, which I am right.
: For the match, I said they are 4.0 sectional, which I am wrong.
|
|
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 91 For level, they are bumped to 5.0. So I thought your estimate was consistent
but 0.5 level lower, no?
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: No.
: For level, I said they are at least 4.5 - 水平至少是4.5, which I am right.
: For the match, I said they are 4.0 sectional, which I am wrong.
|
t****i
发帖数: 4225 | 92 wow, 5.0, I thought at most some of them are 4.5.
The 3 people who I am playing regularly with are better than almost all of
them. I should bump two of them to 5.0 directly and my ex-partner to 5.0+.
SHBH mm is not even considered, haha.
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: These are USTA PNW 4.5 Sectional match.
: Most of them are bumped to 5.0 according to last month ESR.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 93 you are right :(
consistent
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: For level, they are bumped to 5.0. So I thought your estimate was consistent
: but 0.5 level lower, no?
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 94 //nod, on average I probably underestimated by 0.5.
I just didn't like the bunch of double faults from the blue guy
in day 2. His groundies are really good but his serves are very
bad...
I also underestimated the white shirt. I thought he looked overweight
and he was obviously dominated by the gray guy in the video (total
points around 2:3). But he won, //sigh...
In the last match, the black guy actually won the blue guy. There
were no highlights in the few shots he stroke. I thought he was just
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: aglee. 老啃也不靠铺 :P
:
: each
: assume
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 95 "水平至少是4.5"
means they are still 4.5 because ESR is not the final ranking. 至少 means
they could be very strong in 4.5, which is ESR 5.0.
I am very accurate!!
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: You are wrong on both accounts.
: For level, most of them are 5.0 in the recent ESR.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 96 I told you. you already 4.5 at least!
.
【在 t****i 的大作中提到】
: wow, 5.0, I thought at most some of them are 4.5.
: The 3 people who I am playing regularly with are better than almost all of
: them. I should bump two of them to 5.0 directly and my ex-partner to 5.0+.
: SHBH mm is not even considered, haha.
:
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 97 But deltafox did not take such hint into account.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Yes, but after radio hinted that this is playoff, I felt 4.5 is
: the most likely level.
: I originally thought this could be USTA Open where players from
: different levels play together.
:
: each
: assume
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 98 平时练习和关键比赛可是大不一样的。
Sectional final， 很少有人能发挥自己100%水平。大家压力都很大。
.
【在 t****i 的大作中提到】
: wow, 5.0, I thought at most some of them are 4.5.
: The 3 people who I am playing regularly with are better than almost all of
: them. I should bump two of them to 5.0 directly and my ex-partner to 5.0+.
: SHBH mm is not even considered, haha.
:
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 99 Yeah, I would say it could be huge different. If you don't play any USTA match previously, you may be even 0.5 or more lower in the real match.
That is why I don't care about the win or loss in the practice or any friendly match. I only focus on the USTA match.
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 平时练习和关键比赛可是大不一样的。
: Sectional final， 很少有人能发挥自己100%水平。大家压力都很大。
:
: .
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 100 deltafox didn't even claim an explicit prediction.
If you assume by "我见过5.0，5。5的比赛比这个还要差" means
"at least 5.0-5.5", then his prediction is OK but a little
bit overestimated.
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: But deltafox did not take such hint into account.
|
|
|
b*****t
发帖数: 758 | 101 Why deltafox? I was right on the mark. Haha.
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Tennis/31416093_0.html
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: deltafox didn't even claim an explicit prediction.
: If you assume by "我见过5.0，5。5的比赛比这个还要差" means
: "at least 5.0-5.5", then his prediction is OK but a little
: bit overestimated.
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 102 He is the only one estimated at 5.0 level or maybe over-estimated a little.
However, it is very easy to under-estimate. Much harder to over-estimate. I
have to admit that I under-estimated too.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: deltafox didn't even claim an explicit prediction.
: If you assume by "我见过5.0，5。5的比赛比这个还要差" means
: "at least 5.0-5.5", then his prediction is OK but a little
: bit overestimated.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 103 wow, we got a winner!
【在 b*****t 的大作中提到】
: Why deltafox? I was right on the mark. Haha.
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Tennis/31416093_0.html
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 104 Oops, did not see that. You were right on. Cool!
【在 b*****t 的大作中提到】
: Why deltafox? I was right on the mark. Haha.
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Tennis/31416093_0.html
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 105 My major issue with deltafox is that he did not make a prediction.
His words even indicates that he doesn't want to make a prediction.
Of course that's just my understanding.
These are his only words in this thread. I failed to determine
what his estimate really is.
纠缠这个没什么太大意义，我见过5.0，5。5的比赛比这个还要差。。。
一点也不夸张啊，我亲眼所见。我得知是5。0，5。5的比赛也很震惊，当然大部分的选
手还是很牛的。
.
I
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: He is the only one estimated at 5.0 level or maybe over-estimated a little.
: However, it is very easy to under-estimate. Much harder to over-estimate. I
: have to admit that I under-estimated too.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 106 Hands down. 100% accurate.
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: wow, we got a winner!
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 107 I agree that deltafox didn't make a final decision.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: My major issue with deltafox is that he did not make a prediction.
: His words even indicates that he doesn't want to make a prediction.
: Of course that's just my understanding.
: These are his only words in this thread. I failed to determine
: what his estimate really is.
: 纠缠这个没什么太大意义，我见过5.0，5。5的比赛比这个还要差。。。
: 一点也不夸张啊，我亲眼所见。我得知是5。0，5。5的比赛也很震惊，当然大部分的选
: 手还是很牛的。
:
: .
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 108 发包子吧~~
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Hands down. 100% accurate.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 109 Already did.
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: 发包子吧~~
|
Y**s
发帖数: 1632 | 110 damn, did i miss a chance to bet against KennyD?!!!!!
NOOOOOOOOOOO. I could have been rich again! :) |
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 111 This time I was on the winning side ah, hehe.
Too bad MildSeven didn't accept the bet.
【在 Y**s 的大作中提到】
: damn, did i miss a chance to bet against KennyD?!!!!!
: NOOOOOOOOOOO. I could have been rich again! :)
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 112 McEnroe is 51 now. I saw him in senior tour on TV. Seems he is a lot
stronger than this ex-pro guy. He got any chance in 5.5 league?
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Should be barely 5.0.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 113 ft, did you watch he played against andy roddick in WTT? They are very close.
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: McEnroe is 51 now. I saw him in senior tour on TV. Seems he is a lot
: stronger than this ex-pro guy. He got any chance in 5.5 league?
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 114 Might be a little tough for him.
http://dps.usta.com/usta_master/usta/doc/content/doc_13_7372.pdf
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: McEnroe is 51 now. I saw him in senior tour on TV. Seems he is a lot
: stronger than this ex-pro guy. He got any chance in 5.5 league?
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 115 Yeah, he is still very good for sure. But maybe 3 sets could be too much for
his stamina?
close.
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: ft, did you watch he played against andy roddick in WTT? They are very close.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 116 Shouldn't be too much issue because in legends league it's also
3 sets and he did pretty well.
But his speed though, could be an issue. You know he is a S&V
guy... He probably can still handle average D1 players but it's
hard for him to be a solid or strong 5.5 player.
for
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: Yeah, he is still very good for sure. But maybe 3 sets could be too much for
: his stamina?
:
: close.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 117 Good, babolat deserves it!
虽然我一直不赞同用video来判定NTRP,但LZ这个post还是十分好的.我想要是真的用
video来判定NTRP,如果用一般的练习和平常的比赛,都是没有压力的,许多都不靠谱.最
好是贴USTA的,这样更准.这样的话MITBBS NTRP就与USTA NTRP慢慢接近了~~
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Already did.
|
d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 118 yeah...
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: wow, deltafox's estimate is the most accurate. Admire.
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 119 I saw those guys like Todd Martin or so on, their ground stroke is not
slower than 5.5 player at all.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Shouldn't be too much issue because in legends league it's also
: 3 sets and he did pretty well.
: But his speed though, could be an issue. You know he is a S&V
: guy... He probably can still handle average D1 players but it's
: hard for him to be a solid or strong 5.5 player.
:
: for
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 120 I am not saying ball speed, but running speed...
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: I saw those guys like Todd Martin or so on, their ground stroke is not
: slower than 5.5 player at all.
|
|
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 121 I know. But his running speed is ok for volleying against Todd Martin's
groundies. Should be ok for handling 5.5 players, no?
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: I am not saying ball speed, but running speed...
|
d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 122 ft.这么快我的包子就没了？搞得这么serious?不就是俩伪币吗？不如给大家都发一轮
大家乐呵乐呵？hoho...
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Already did.
|
d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 123 又没打过你怎么知道谁能赢？录像看起来差真正打起来你就知道厉害了。
.
【在 t****i 的大作中提到】
: wow, 5.0, I thought at most some of them are 4.5.
: The 3 people who I am playing regularly with are better than almost all of
: them. I should bump two of them to 5.0 directly and my ex-partner to 5.0+.
: SHBH mm is not even considered, haha.
:
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 124 No, because he needs to volley more rounds, hehe.
Todd Martin is easier to kill.
The advantage of running faster:
1) Better defense.
2) Better return of service.
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: I know. But his running speed is ok for volleying against Todd Martin's
: groundies. Should be ok for handling 5.5 players, no?
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 125 No ben no truth.
For tenfei, he needs to lower double fault rate to below 25% before
being rated 5.0, haha.
【在 d******x 的大作中提到】
: 又没打过你怎么知道谁能赢？录像看起来差真正打起来你就知道厉害了。
:
: .
|
d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 126 本乐也不一定就能看出来啊。
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: No ben no truth.
: For tenfei, he needs to lower double fault rate to below 25% before
: being rated 5.0, haha.
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 127 Ben个关键比赛就能看出来了。比如，usta playoff or tournament final.
【在 d******x 的大作中提到】
: 本乐也不一定就能看出来啊。
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 128 Good, make lots of sense. Your understanding of tennis is quite deep now.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: No, because he needs to volley more rounds, hehe.
: Todd Martin is easier to kill.
: The advantage of running faster:
: 1) Better defense.
: 2) Better return of service.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 129 //blush. I actually realized this last year after watching
a male 3.5 beating a female 4.5. (all numbers are estimated.)
The girl was obviously at better level with forehand as fast
as the guy and much more consistent. Too bad she couldn't run.
She lost 3:6.
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: Good, make lots of sense. Your understanding of tennis is quite deep now.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 130 I don't think tenfei has played USTA matches. I don't even think
he has played friendly matches...
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: Ben个关键比赛就能看出来了。比如，usta playoff or tournament final.
|
|
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 131 It is normal ba. I always think the difference between male and female is 1.
0.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: //blush. I actually realized this last year after watching
: a male 3.5 beating a female 4.5. (all numbers are estimated.)
: The girl was obviously at better level with forehand as fast
: as the guy and much more consistent. Too bad she couldn't run.
: She lost 3:6.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 132 re
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: Ben个关键比赛就能看出来了。比如，usta playoff or tournament final.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 133 Why do I feel I'll lose to biok 2:6?
Also you said we have no xi against biok & LD in outdoor doubles...
1.
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: It is normal ba. I always think the difference between male and female is 1.
: 0.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 134 Man, it is all talk! You never know what will happen in the real one.
One big advantage she has is experience. She plays so many USTA matches. You play none!
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Why do I feel I'll lose to biok 2:6?
: Also you said we have no xi against biok & LD in outdoor doubles...
:
: 1.
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 135 你这会把这版上的女生都得罪了。你危险了！
1.
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: It is normal ba. I always think the difference between male and female is 1.
: 0.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 136 I do play friendly matches. No USTA experience is needed ah,
if I play with biok, it's gonna be friendly match only, no?
I just feel I have no weapon to win a female 4.0. My technique
has flaw. They just need to slice and lob me and I am dead...
I can't even be a pusher coz they probably have better stamina.
You play none!
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: Man, it is all talk! You never know what will happen in the real one.
: One big advantage she has is experience. She plays so many USTA matches. You play none!
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 137 注意,我只说"the difference between male and female",没有说谁强谁弱
// 顶锅盖
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 你这会把这版上的女生都得罪了。你危险了！
:
: 1.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 138 What I said is general speaking. Even though you do lose to her, it doesn't
means in general, what I say is not true, you are just one of the failed
cases. We need more samples. But that is what I feel.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: I do play friendly matches. No USTA experience is needed ah,
: if I play with biok, it's gonna be friendly match only, no?
: I just feel I have no weapon to win a female 4.0. My technique
: has flaw. They just need to slice and lob me and I am dead...
: I can't even be a pusher coz they probably have better stamina.
:
: You play none!
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 139 I played with a kid before. His ground stroke is more consistent than mine
and has similar pace. But I usually can beat him. I believe it is because I
run a little bit faster than him. We tried running a round trip along court
baseline once. I am actually only one step faster than him. But it makes
quite some difference. One rainy day, I lost badly to him because the floor
has a lot of moist and we both dare not to run at full speed.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: //blush. I actually realized this last year after watching
: a male 3.5 beating a female 4.5. (all numbers are estimated.)
: The girl was obviously at better level with forehand as fast
: as the guy and much more consistent. Too bad she couldn't run.
: She lost 3:6.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 140 Can't aglee more. That's why I always feel I have a shot to win
any 10 year old pro girl (no matter how text-book their forms
are), hehe.
I
court
floor
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: I played with a kid before. His ground stroke is more consistent than mine
: and has similar pace. But I usually can beat him. I believe it is because I
: run a little bit faster than him. We tried running a round trip along court
: baseline once. I am actually only one step faster than him. But it makes
: quite some difference. One rainy day, I lost badly to him because the floor
: has a lot of moist and we both dare not to run at full speed.
|
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 141 Well, I have never actually played with rated USTA female players
before. But for estimated 3.5 female players, I feel it's
gonna take me some serious effort to win. Usually I can't keep the
rally short because they don't make errors.
t
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: What I said is general speaking. Even though you do lose to her, it doesn't
: means in general, what I say is not true, you are just one of the failed
: cases. We need more samples. But that is what I feel.
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 142 I would say you only have chance against mid pack 10 years old pro girl. Not
top tier.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Can't aglee more. That's why I always feel I have a shot to win
: any 10 year old pro girl (no matter how text-book their forms
: are), hehe.
:
: I
: court
: floor
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 143 Come on, you actually have the answer by yourself in the previous post. Like I always say, it is all about the footwork. Man generally runs faster and have more power than woman. So even though she has good ground strokes, she has to be in position first! If your ball makes her out of position or balance, the whole game will be totally different.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Well, I have never actually played with rated USTA female players
: before. But for estimated 3.5 female players, I feel it's
: gonna take me some serious effort to win. Usually I can't keep the
: rally short because they don't make errors.
:
: t
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 144 But I can't ah. For 3.0 ball speed, it's not easy to drag the
opponent out of position. You know my style is quite defensive
since my volley is super bad. I almost never push up.
I exercised with a weak 3.5 old guy. He is also slow but he's
enough to handle all my forehands easily just by slicing. If
my forehand can't kill opponent's backhand, I am dead meat.
Like I always say, it is all about the footwork. Man generally runs faster
and have more power than woman. So even though she has good g
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: Come on, you actually have the answer by yourself in the previous post. Like I always say, it is all about the footwork. Man generally runs faster and have more power than woman. So even though she has good ground strokes, she has to be in position first! If your ball makes her out of position or balance, the whole game will be totally different.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 145 Maybe. I never saw top tier before. But for that girl who won
a under 12 tournament in Canada (I posted a video before), I
think I can just lob with her back and forth (with some sudden
drop shots), hehe.
Not
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: I would say you only have chance against mid pack 10 years old pro girl. Not
: top tier.
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 146 I thought you are a good 工科男! we talk about 3.0 man vs 3.5/4.0 female
here. Your 3.5 old guy is totally the different case!
Looks 工科男 is only good at the numbers. sigh...
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: But I can't ah. For 3.0 ball speed, it's not easy to drag the
: opponent out of position. You know my style is quite defensive
: since my volley is super bad. I almost never push up.
: I exercised with a weak 3.5 old guy. He is also slow but he's
: enough to handle all my forehands easily just by slicing. If
: my forehand can't kill opponent's backhand, I am dead meat.
:
: Like I always say, it is all about the footwork. Man generally runs faster
: and have more power than woman. So even though she has good g
|
M*******n
发帖数: 508 | 147 Just back home. I'm totally blown out! By the way, your offer is not that
fair yah. Although it's 2:1, I only get one winning spot, 3.5. More or less
than that, you would win.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: This time I was on the winning side ah, hehe.
: Too bad MildSeven didn't accept the bet.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 148 ft, I am using a 3.5 old guy example!
He is equally slow as a young 3.5 lady. Of course, his volley
and power is much better than 3.5 female, but I was just focusing
on why I can't kill a 3.5 lady.
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: I thought you are a good 工科男! we talk about 3.0 man vs 3.5/4.0 female
: here. Your 3.5 old guy is totally the different case!
: Looks 工科男 is only good at the numbers. sigh...
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 149 I don't think they are same.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: ft, I am using a 3.5 old guy example!
: He is equally slow as a young 3.5 lady. Of course, his volley
: and power is much better than 3.5 female, but I was just focusing
: on why I can't kill a 3.5 lady.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 150 Originally I was gonna give 10:1, but after the big loss with
Yoss, I don't dare to do it again leh... hehe.
less
【在 M*******n 的大作中提到】
: Just back home. I'm totally blown out! By the way, your offer is not that
: fair yah. Although it's 2:1, I only get one winning spot, 3.5. More or less
: than that, you would win.
|
|
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 151 That proved two things:
1. Nadal is the beast.
2. You are too rich.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Originally I was gonna give 10:1, but after the big loss with
: Yoss, I don't dare to do it again leh... hehe.
:
: less
|
g*****y
发帖数: 7271 | 152 Come on, there are not many choices any way. I did not see any one guessing
3.0 below or 5.0 above. That makes it only three choices, 3.5, 4.0 and 4.5.
So, you have one slot and he has two slots. 2:1 is quite a fair rate. You
can argue the amount though, such as you don't have that much weibi.
KennyD, if he gives you the bet, would you give me a baozi? haha
less
【在 M*******n 的大作中提到】
: Just back home. I'm totally blown out! By the way, your offer is not that
: fair yah. Although it's 2:1, I only get one winning spot, 3.5. More or less
: than that, you would win.
|
T*******e
发帖数: 1156 | 153
这个。。。可靠吗？
这哥们儿八十年代搞过俩马来西亚国内冠军，并未参加国际积分赛事，他的排名咋来的
。。。
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: That proved two things:
: 1. Nadal is the beast.
: 2. You are too rich.
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 154 你认识？
我是听我teammate说的。
如果你肯定的话，我就把前文改过来。
【在 T*******e 的大作中提到】
:
: 这个。。。可靠吗？
: 这哥们儿八十年代搞过俩马来西亚国内冠军，并未参加国际积分赛事，他的排名咋来的
: 。。。
|
M*******n
发帖数: 508 | 155 As you said, the range is >=3.0 and <=5.0, so KennyD would have winning
slots of 3.0, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, it's 4:1, haha
guessing
.
【在 g*****y 的大作中提到】
: Come on, there are not many choices any way. I did not see any one guessing
: 3.0 below or 5.0 above. That makes it only three choices, 3.5, 4.0 and 4.5.
: So, you have one slot and he has two slots. 2:1 is quite a fair rate. You
: can argue the amount though, such as you don't have that much weibi.
: KennyD, if he gives you the bet, would you give me a baozi? haha
:
: less
|
a**s
发帖数: 9606 | 156 hehe, I could not find his information on ATP website either.
【在 T*******e 的大作中提到】
:
: 这个。。。可靠吗？
: 这哥们儿八十年代搞过俩马来西亚国内冠军，并未参加国际积分赛事，他的排名咋来的
: 。。。
|
a**s
发帖数: 9606 | 157 刚刚去看了一下4.5 National的结果. 看来还是低估了Pacific Northwest.
他们小组还是赢了一场(对北加). 1:2小组倒数第二. 但和小组第一德州打
成2:3. 还是不错的. 德州最终获得全国第3.
而且吴哥威武, 赢了2场#1 singles和一场#1 Double. 其中一场single还送
出了一个蛋蛋.
【在 a**s 的大作中提到】
: then I would guess to be 4.0 sectional final. I do not think
: they have chance in national if they were playing 4.5 sectional
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 158 看来National比赛证明，录像中的几个应该算usta标准的4.5+了。可以作为本版NTRP 4
.5 Benchmark了。
【在 a**s 的大作中提到】
: 刚刚去看了一下4.5 National的结果. 看来还是低估了Pacific Northwest.
: 他们小组还是赢了一场(对北加). 1:2小组倒数第二. 但和小组第一德州打
: 成2:3. 还是不错的. 德州最终获得全国第3.
: 而且吴哥威武, 赢了2场#1 singles和一场#1 Double. 其中一场single还送
: 出了一个蛋蛋.
|
a**s
发帖数: 9606 | 159 should be. I thougth they were 4.5- at first, now seems they should be
4.5+.
4
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 看来National比赛证明，录像中的几个应该算usta标准的4.5+了。可以作为本版NTRP 4
: .5 Benchmark了。
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 160 这benchmark没啥用吧，版上99%的人都达到不了，就象你拿ff,nadal的录像来说这时GS
，no.1的benchmark,浮云呀~~
最好从2.5到4.5,每个level都有sectional和national的录像,这些做benchmark就有用
多了!
4
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 看来National比赛证明，录像中的几个应该算usta标准的4.5+了。可以作为本版NTRP 4
: .5 Benchmark了。
|
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 161 强烈支持2.5 benchmark!
GS
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: 这benchmark没啥用吧，版上99%的人都达到不了，就象你拿ff,nadal的录像来说这时GS
: ，no.1的benchmark,浮云呀~~
: 最好从2.5到4.5,每个level都有sectional和national的录像,这些做benchmark就有用
: 多了!
:
: 4
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 162 你和google有partnership,这工作肯定是你来咯~~
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 强烈支持2.5 benchmark!
:
: GS
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 163 4.0+ benchmark 用你的录像就行了。
3.5+ benchmark用ASUS的。他今年不是刚从4.0appeal down到 3.5。
3.0 benchamark用老肯的。他现在应该是标准的avg. 3.0。
2.5 就别benchmark了。看了几眼2.5 sectional比赛，惨不忍睹。就别刺激大家了。
GS
【在 a*****3 的大作中提到】
: 这benchmark没啥用吧，版上99%的人都达到不了，就象你拿ff,nadal的录像来说这时GS
: ，no.1的benchmark,浮云呀~~
: 最好从2.5到4.5,每个level都有sectional和national的录像,这些做benchmark就有用
: 多了!
:
: 4
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 164 I played with two 2.5's who lost in sectional. I got bageled.
It's doubles though.
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 4.0+ benchmark 用你的录像就行了。
: 3.5+ benchmark用ASUS的。他今年不是刚从4.0appeal down到 3.5。
: 3.0 benchamark用老肯的。他现在应该是标准的avg. 3.0。
: 2.5 就别benchmark了。看了几眼2.5 sectional比赛，惨不忍睹。就别刺激大家了。
:
: GS
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 165 You just need more match experience. 加入我派巴。
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: I played with two 2.5's who lost in sectional. I got bageled.
: It's doubles though.
|
b*****n
发帖数: 17570 | 166 这些录像都在哪里？应该放到置顶才对。
其实2.5也奔驰马克一下才好。
像俺这种练野球拳的，一直就没弄明白自己什么档次。
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 4.0+ benchmark 用你的录像就行了。
: 3.5+ benchmark用ASUS的。他今年不是刚从4.0appeal down到 3.5。
: 3.0 benchamark用老肯的。他现在应该是标准的avg. 3.0。
: 2.5 就别benchmark了。看了几眼2.5 sectional比赛，惨不忍睹。就别刺激大家了。
:
: GS
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 167 偶怎么觉得强2.5的技术还挺不错的。他们正手有directional control,
而且volley/overhead很全面，发球也很快，虽然命中率不高。
偶在网前，如果对方没有击球前贸然移动，他们会当即改变击球方向而
穿越偶。
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 4.0+ benchmark 用你的录像就行了。
: 3.5+ benchmark用ASUS的。他今年不是刚从4.0appeal down到 3.5。
: 3.0 benchamark用老肯的。他现在应该是标准的avg. 3.0。
: 2.5 就别benchmark了。看了几眼2.5 sectional比赛，惨不忍睹。就别刺激大家了。
:
: GS
|
r*********x
发帖数: 3016 | 168 网球初学者进步相当快的。有运动基础的一年达到avg. 3.5不是很困难。
所以这些self rate 2.5打到Sectional就可能有弱3.0了。过几个月就有可能进化成强3
.0。 所以这个2.5挺难benchmarked.
到了3.5+之后，大部分人进步就会像蜗牛爬了。
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 偶怎么觉得强2.5的技术还挺不错的。他们正手有directional control,
: 而且volley/overhead很全面，发球也很快，虽然命中率不高。
: 偶在网前，如果对方没有击球前贸然移动，他们会当即改变击球方向而
: 穿越偶。
|
h*******s
发帖数: 8454 | 169 2。5得我可以拍一段双误视频，哈哈
有用
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 4.0+ benchmark 用你的录像就行了。
: 3.5+ benchmark用ASUS的。他今年不是刚从4.0appeal down到 3.5。
: 3.0 benchamark用老肯的。他现在应该是标准的avg. 3.0。
: 2.5 就别benchmark了。看了几眼2.5 sectional比赛，惨不忍睹。就别刺激大家了。
:
: GS
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 170 作为器材派，偶当然要先从器材下手了。那天首次使用的ProKennex
Copper Ace还不太习惯，frame了很多。外加上线不知道是多少年前的了，
拍子又太软。另外这辈子首次打室内。
这么多的器材因素，不被bagel才怪阿。。。
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: You just need more match experience. 加入我派巴。
|
|
|
a*****3
发帖数: 10373 | 171 喷！用我的录像？？岂不是人人都觉得自己是5.0+了？
【在 r*********x 的大作中提到】
: 4.0+ benchmark 用你的录像就行了。
: 3.5+ benchmark用ASUS的。他今年不是刚从4.0appeal down到 3.5。
: 3.0 benchamark用老肯的。他现在应该是标准的avg. 3.0。
: 2.5 就别benchmark了。看了几眼2.5 sectional比赛，惨不忍睹。就别刺激大家了。
:
: GS
|
