b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 1 这些球拍都是非常好的中级通往高级之路的拍子。因为我已经settle down Head MGPP
，不再花心其他球拍了，所以慢慢把这些出了。
1. Yonex RQIS Tour 1, 4 3/8, 9+/10, $85 shipped, strung with NXT 17
2. Head Microgel Prestige Midplus, 4 3/8, 9+/10, $85 shipped, strung with
NRG2 17
3. Fischer M Pro No 1 No Tolerance Version, 4 3/8, 8.5/10, $75 shipped
4. Fischer M Pro No 1 (older version), 4 3/8, 8/10, $65 shipped
5. Fischer Pro No 1 330g, 4 3/8, 9/10, $70 shipped
6. Fischer Pro No 1 320g, 4 3/8, 9/10, $70 shipped
7. ProKennex Heritage Type C Redondo MP, 4 3/8, 8.5/10, $75 shipped
8. Fischer M Tour SL MidPlus, 4 1/2, 8.5/10, $55 shipped (this one plays
like Prince Graphite Original Oversize)
Only ships to continental USA. Price is already very low, so it's pretty
much firm. 感兴趣的话，站内邮件联系，photos available upon request.
BTW, I have 30+ trading excellent reference on Tennis Warehouse Forum, and
my Ebay feedback is 260+ (100%). So the risk for any buyer should be minimum
. | a**s
发帖数: 9606 | 2 真多啊，还是俺简单，总共没用过几把拍子
MGPP
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: 这些球拍都是非常好的中级通往高级之路的拍子。因为我已经settle down Head MGPP
: ，不再花心其他球拍了，所以慢慢把这些出了。
: 1. Yonex RQIS Tour 1, 4 3/8, 9+/10, $85 shipped, strung with NXT 17
: 2. Head Microgel Prestige Midplus, 4 3/8, 9+/10, $85 shipped, strung with
: NRG2 17
: 3. Fischer M Pro No 1 No Tolerance Version, 4 3/8, 8.5/10, $75 shipped
: 4. Fischer M Pro No 1 (older version), 4 3/8, 8/10, $65 shipped
: 5. Fischer Pro No 1 330g, 4 3/8, 9/10, $70 shipped
: 6. Fischer Pro No 1 320g, 4 3/8, 9/10, $70 shipped
: 7. ProKennex Heritage Type C Redondo MP, 4 3/8, 8.5/10, $75 shipped
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 3 因为我是器材派的 :)
【在 a**s 的大作中提到】
: 真多啊，还是俺简单，总共没用过几把拍子
:
: MGPP
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 4 我这一个快升4.5的美国小伙，永远是一个小背包加两只拍子，可惜他最近打得太好了
都没时间跟我们下手打了。
【在 a**s 的大作中提到】
: 真多啊，还是俺简单，总共没用过几把拍子
:
: MGPP
| n**********s
发帖数: 275 | | n**********s
发帖数: 275 | 6 if you are close, I can try one or two:) | n**u
发帖数: 768 | 7 呵呵，太花心了。
MGPP
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: 这些球拍都是非常好的中级通往高级之路的拍子。因为我已经settle down Head MGPP
: ，不再花心其他球拍了，所以慢慢把这些出了。
: 1. Yonex RQIS Tour 1, 4 3/8, 9+/10, $85 shipped, strung with NXT 17
: 2. Head Microgel Prestige Midplus, 4 3/8, 9+/10, $85 shipped, strung with
: NRG2 17
: 3. Fischer M Pro No 1 No Tolerance Version, 4 3/8, 8.5/10, $75 shipped
: 4. Fischer M Pro No 1 (older version), 4 3/8, 8/10, $65 shipped
: 5. Fischer Pro No 1 330g, 4 3/8, 9/10, $70 shipped
: 6. Fischer Pro No 1 320g, 4 3/8, 9/10, $70 shipped
: 7. ProKennex Heritage Type C Redondo MP, 4 3/8, 8.5/10, $75 shipped
| r*****u
发帖数: 169 | | b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 9 站内邮件联系
【在 r*****u 的大作中提到】
: 俺有兴趣，咋联系？
| m**U
发帖数: 968 | 10 我刚从铝拍升级到低档碳素拍，所有这些拍子都没听说过，这里面有没有大头拍适合上
旋打法的？
MGPP
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: 这些球拍都是非常好的中级通往高级之路的拍子。因为我已经settle down Head MGPP
: ，不再花心其他球拍了，所以慢慢把这些出了。
: 1. Yonex RQIS Tour 1, 4 3/8, 9+/10, $85 shipped, strung with NXT 17
: 2. Head Microgel Prestige Midplus, 4 3/8, 9+/10, $85 shipped, strung with
: NRG2 17
: 3. Fischer M Pro No 1 No Tolerance Version, 4 3/8, 8.5/10, $75 shipped
: 4. Fischer M Pro No 1 (older version), 4 3/8, 8/10, $65 shipped
: 5. Fischer Pro No 1 330g, 4 3/8, 9/10, $70 shipped
: 6. Fischer Pro No 1 320g, 4 3/8, 9/10, $70 shipped
: 7. ProKennex Heritage Type C Redondo MP, 4 3/8, 8.5/10, $75 shipped
| | | b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 11 #8 is 100 sq inches, very similar as POG OS, which is good for spin.
However, the grip size is 4 1/2. You might need a thin replacement grip to
reduce the grip size.
【在 m**U 的大作中提到】
: 我刚从铝拍升级到低档碳素拍，所有这些拍子都没听说过，这里面有没有大头拍适合上
: 旋打法的？
:
: MGPP
| K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 12 POG OS isn't actually a racket for spin. It's too heavy to average wsn to
hit with good spin. It's still in the classic category.
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: #8 is 100 sq inches, very similar as POG OS, which is good for spin.
: However, the grip size is 4 1/2. You might need a thin replacement grip to
: reduce the grip size.
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 13 All my racquets are player's racquets, which are 11.5-12.0 oz strung weight.
If anyone can't handle the weight, just ignore it. But i think average joe
should challenge the weight in order to be a better player.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: POG OS isn't actually a racket for spin. It's too heavy to average wsn to
: hit with good spin. It's still in the classic category.
| a**s
发帖数: 9606 | 14 lol xmo用POG OS可以把你旋得找不到北
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: POG OS isn't actually a racket for spin. It's too heavy to average wsn to
: hit with good spin. It's still in the classic category.
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 15 MG Prestige MP is sold.
MGPP
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: 这些球拍都是非常好的中级通往高级之路的拍子。因为我已经settle down Head MGPP
: ，不再花心其他球拍了，所以慢慢把这些出了。
: 1. Yonex RQIS Tour 1, 4 3/8, 9+/10, $85 shipped, strung with NXT 17
: 2. Head Microgel Prestige Midplus, 4 3/8, 9+/10, $85 shipped, strung with
: NRG2 17
: 3. Fischer M Pro No 1 No Tolerance Version, 4 3/8, 8.5/10, $75 shipped
: 4. Fischer M Pro No 1 (older version), 4 3/8, 8/10, $65 shipped
: 5. Fischer Pro No 1 330g, 4 3/8, 9/10, $70 shipped
: 6. Fischer Pro No 1 320g, 4 3/8, 9/10, $70 shipped
: 7. ProKennex Heritage Type C Redondo MP, 4 3/8, 8.5/10, $75 shipped
| d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 16 说说雷东多吧？
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: MG Prestige MP is sold.
:
: MGPP
| d**********8
发帖数: 326 | 17 don't agree.
I used to have five of them (as you can see in my pic). Very Stable and arm
friendly, generating tons of spin. very good for baseliner.
Then Why I got rid of them......
Because I was stupid at that time and blame my bad performance on the
rackets. :(
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: POG OS isn't actually a racket for spin. It's too heavy to average wsn to
: hit with good spin. It's still in the classic category.
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 18 Not sure about Redondo.
I know Fischer M Pro No 1 was choice of racquet by Baghdatis.
And Fischer Pro No 1 (older version) was choice of racquet by Kafelnikov.
The older version of Fischer Pro No 1 is more solid and more control than
any Wilson 6.1 95 that I owned before.
The Fischer M Pro No 1 is a little lighter, it's a lot ot control, very
comfortable to use.
See the photos below.
I might just keep them for fun if there is no buyers. It's a lot of fun to
use them, it won't be my main racquet. | K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 19 Mine is 12.8 oz with overgrip. Really not that easy to generate head speed.
I lended mine to a topspin wsn, he played horribly compared to his APD.
I have traditional strokes so it doesn't affect me too much. I can only
use POG OS to counter punch.
arm
【在 d**********8 的大作中提到】
: don't agree.
: I used to have five of them (as you can see in my pic). Very Stable and arm
: friendly, generating tons of spin. very good for baseliner.
: Then Why I got rid of them......
: Because I was stupid at that time and blame my bad performance on the
: rackets. :(
| c***t
发帖数: 1216 | 20 prestige mid 穿了线大概有多重？
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Mine is 12.8 oz with overgrip. Really not that easy to generate head speed.
: I lended mine to a topspin wsn, he played horribly compared to his APD.
: I have traditional strokes so it doesn't affect me too much. I can only
: use POG OS to counter punch.
:
: arm
| | | K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 21 12.4 oz strung with overgrip. And it's more head light than POG OS.
【在 c***t 的大作中提到】
: prestige mid 穿了线大概有多重？
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 22 How come your POG OS is 12.8 oz? That's not good for you as 器材派. For any
racquet that I own, if I string it, put overgrip and a rubber band, the
additional weight added will be around 0.6 oz. All POG OS and POG Mid that I
previously owned are between 12.1-12.3 oz.
IMO, it's not difficult to swing a head light 12 oz racquet, because it's
swing weight sometime is even smaller than those head heavy 10-11 oz racquet.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Mine is 12.8 oz with overgrip. Really not that easy to generate head speed.
: I lended mine to a topspin wsn, he played horribly compared to his APD.
: I have traditional strokes so it doesn't affect me too much. I can only
: use POG OS to counter punch.
:
: arm
| K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 23 Because I weighed it at the post office. I weigh almost all my rackets and
measure the balance points too.
The string also makes a different. Poly is heavier than syn gut. For that
POG OS, I happened to use 16g poly, and it's oversize BTW, so close to
38-39 feet.
I have also measured the swing weight of POG OS with some of my other
rackets and posted the numbers on board before. POG OS has the heaviest
SW. When I play, I feel difficulty serving and hitting backhand -- just
too slow.
any
I
racquet.
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: How come your POG OS is 12.8 oz? That's not good for you as 器材派. For any
: racquet that I own, if I string it, put overgrip and a rubber band, the
: additional weight added will be around 0.6 oz. All POG OS and POG Mid that I
: previously owned are between 12.1-12.3 oz.
: IMO, it's not difficult to swing a head light 12 oz racquet, because it's
: swing weight sometime is even smaller than those head heavy 10-11 oz racquet.
| d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 24 @@你不是在出雷东多吗？
那两个fishcher我都有，不好用，太轻，头太大，frame看着太厚又太尖。。。
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: Not sure about Redondo.
: I know Fischer M Pro No 1 was choice of racquet by Baghdatis.
: And Fischer Pro No 1 (older version) was choice of racquet by Kafelnikov.
: The older version of Fischer Pro No 1 is more solid and more control than
: any Wilson 6.1 95 that I owned before.
: The Fischer M Pro No 1 is a little lighter, it's a lot ot control, very
: comfortable to use.
: See the photos below.
: I might just keep them for fun if there is no buyers. It's a lot of fun to
: use them, it won't be my main racquet.
| K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 25 Links:
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Tennis/31860963.html
(The first racket is POG OS)
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Tennis/31858745.html
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Because I weighed it at the post office. I weigh almost all my rackets and
: measure the balance points too.
: The string also makes a different. Poly is heavier than syn gut. For that
: POG OS, I happened to use 16g poly, and it's oversize BTW, so close to
: 38-39 feet.
: I have also measured the swing weight of POG OS with some of my other
: rackets and posted the numbers on board before. POG OS has the heaviest
: SW. When I play, I feel difficulty serving and hitting backhand -- just
: too slow.
:
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 26 If the scale is accurate, you might be either using a older version (which
is not the same as current version spec), or there is some customization in
the handle, etc. Are you using the current TW version, 4 stripe version or
the very old 1-strip version? If you buy the current version of POG OS,
there is no way that its strung weight can reach 12.8 oz. In fact, due to
quality control of
Prince, most racquet are 0.2 ounce lighter than its specs.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Because I weighed it at the post office. I weigh almost all my rackets and
: measure the balance points too.
: The string also makes a different. Poly is heavier than syn gut. For that
: POG OS, I happened to use 16g poly, and it's oversize BTW, so close to
: 38-39 feet.
: I have also measured the swing weight of POG OS with some of my other
: rackets and posted the numbers on board before. POG OS has the heaviest
: SW. When I play, I feel difficulty serving and hitting backhand -- just
: too slow.
:
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 27 老肯说太重，你又说太轻，呵呵。
330g unstrung的那个，估计strung weight有12.4-12.5了。
【在 d******x 的大作中提到】
: @@你不是在出雷东多吗？
: 那两个fishcher我都有，不好用，太轻，头太大，frame看着太厚又太尖。。。
| K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 28 Yes, post office scales are very accurate. I've weighed the same racket
at multiple post offices and they always matched to the last digit (0.1 oz).
It's the TW version, which is the heaviest version of all (in swing weight,
not in static weight).
My overgrip is 0.2 oz, so without it it's still 12.6 oz 5 pt HL.
No, there is no customization.
I do have another 2 POG OS. Although I haven't measured them, they play
about the same.
Did you measure your rackets or are they (12.1-12.3 oz) the published
numbers?
in
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: If the scale is accurate, you might be either using a older version (which
: is not the same as current version spec), or there is some customization in
: the handle, etc. Are you using the current TW version, 4 stripe version or
: the very old 1-strip version? If you buy the current version of POG OS,
: there is no way that its strung weight can reach 12.8 oz. In fact, due to
: quality control of
: Prince, most racquet are 0.2 ounce lighter than its specs.
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 29 i have a pretty good scale and i always measure it.
there must be something causing your racquet's strung weight too heavy.
we're only talking about static weight. the heaviest that I owned before is
K90. It's about 12.5-12.7oz strung weight.
).
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Yes, post office scales are very accurate. I've weighed the same racket
: at multiple post offices and they always matched to the last digit (0.1 oz).
: It's the TW version, which is the heaviest version of all (in swing weight,
: not in static weight).
: My overgrip is 0.2 oz, so without it it's still 12.6 oz 5 pt HL.
: No, there is no customization.
: I do have another 2 POG OS. Although I haven't measured them, they play
: about the same.
: Did you measure your rackets or are they (12.1-12.3 oz) the published
: numbers?
| K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 30 不可能把，Pro No.1 static weight 12 oz都不到，而且很头轻（9 pts?)，这个
光看数据是不可能达到POG挥重的，除非内部大量质量排列在两头的位置(polorized)。
老三可以评论一下，他的主力拍。
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: 老肯说太重，你又说太轻，呵呵。
: 330g unstrung的那个，估计strung weight有12.4-12.5了。
| | | d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 31 @@有330g吗，我记得是320g呀。我有一个m pro #1 sl，一个pro #1感觉俩差不多重，
都挺轻的。抡上没感觉。。。
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: 老肯说太重，你又说太轻，呵呵。
: 330g unstrung的那个，估计strung weight有12.4-12.5了。
| d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 32 老三的是m pro #1...
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 不可能把，Pro No.1 static weight 12 oz都不到，而且很头轻（9 pts?)，这个
: 光看数据是不可能达到POG挥重的，除非内部大量质量排列在两头的位置(polorized)。
: 老三可以评论一下，他的主力拍。
| K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 33 POG OS不是偶最惨的拍子。偶有一把13.0 oz, 4 pt HL的，最后只好卖掉。
用它水平直接下降0.5.
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: i have a pretty good scale and i always measure it.
: there must be something causing your racquet's strung weight too heavy.
: we're only talking about static weight. the heaviest that I owned before is
: K90. It's about 12.5-12.7oz strung weight.
:
: ).
| d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 34 对啊，如果有12oz应该和90一样重，可是放手里明显差很多啊。。。
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 不可能把，Pro No.1 static weight 12 oz都不到，而且很头轻（9 pts?)，这个
: 光看数据是不可能达到POG挥重的，除非内部大量质量排列在两头的位置(polorized)。
: 老三可以评论一下，他的主力拍。
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 35 yes, there are both 320g version and 330g version. It's very sold too me. I
feel that I can get a lot of topspin by using them.
【在 d******x 的大作中提到】
: @@有330g吗，我记得是320g呀。我有一个m pro #1 sl，一个pro #1感觉俩差不多重，
: 都挺轻的。抡上没感觉。。。
| d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 36 改双正双反。。。
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: POG OS不是偶最惨的拍子。偶有一把13.0 oz, 4 pt HL的，最后只好卖掉。
: 用它水平直接下降0.5.
| c***t
发帖数: 1216 | 37 只有head 是用unstrung weight么
12.4挺重了
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 12.4 oz strung with overgrip. And it's more head light than POG OS.
| K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 38 这个难度远大于从偶衣柜里再随便翻出一把拍子。
【在 d******x 的大作中提到】
: 改双正双反。。。
| K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 39 What do you mean?
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Head_YOUTEK_IG_Prestige_Mid/des
"strung weight"
【在 c***t 的大作中提到】
: 只有head 是用unstrung weight么
: 12.4挺重了
| c***t
发帖数: 1216 | 40 哎？我的microgel 还有classic prestige mid都是11.6OZunstrung
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: What do you mean?
: http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Head_YOUTEK_IG_Prestige_Mid/des
: "strung weight"
| | | K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 41 oh, you mean on the racket.
No, at least Wilson also print unstrung weight.
【在 c***t 的大作中提到】
: 哎？我的microgel 还有classic prestige mid都是11.6OZunstrung
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 42 偶Fishcer M Pro No 1在3，9点加了lead tape。Microgel Prestige MP也加了，不然
的确挥重有些轻。
旧版的Pro #1和现在主力拍Microgel Prestige Pro都不需要加lead tape。
你用惯了k90, classic 6.1 95，估计其他什么拍子都轻了
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 不可能把，Pro No.1 static weight 12 oz都不到，而且很头轻（9 pts?)，这个
: 光看数据是不可能达到POG挥重的，除非内部大量质量排列在两头的位置(polorized)。
: 老三可以评论一下，他的主力拍。
| K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 43 I have never used any Wilson 90. I have used Wilson 85 though.
I have only used PSC 6.1 for 15 minutes, so not much impression there,
except the stiffness.
For me, POG OS tops in the swing weight category among all my match sticks.
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: 偶Fishcer M Pro No 1在3，9点加了lead tape。Microgel Prestige MP也加了，不然
: 的确挥重有些轻。
: 旧版的Pro #1和现在主力拍Microgel Prestige Pro都不需要加lead tape。
: 你用惯了k90, classic 6.1 95，估计其他什么拍子都轻了
| K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 44 Also I do love the Prestige Pro. I demoed a MG version for about 15 minutes,
perfect swing weight for me.
I didn't have a chance to compare it with Prestige MP side by side, so my
impression was they are about the same.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: I have never used any Wilson 90. I have used Wilson 85 though.
: I have only used PSC 6.1 for 15 minutes, so not much impression there,
: except the stiffness.
: For me, POG OS tops in the swing weight category among all my match sticks.
| d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 45 分特我怎么觉得pro #1 比 m pro#1 挥重还要小？
不轻的有prestige mid, pt 280, 好像 Dunlop 200也不轻啊。
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: 偶Fishcer M Pro No 1在3，9点加了lead tape。Microgel Prestige MP也加了，不然
: 的确挥重有些轻。
: 旧版的Pro #1和现在主力拍Microgel Prestige Pro都不需要加lead tape。
: 你用惯了k90, classic 6.1 95，估计其他什么拍子都轻了
| b*e
发帖数: 3845 | 46 I meant to reply to deltafox's thread. :) he is long time user of classic 6.
1 95, which heavy stiff racquet that cause my first occurance of tennis
eblow that I have to stop tennis for half a year.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: I have never used any Wilson 90. I have used Wilson 85 though.
: I have only used PSC 6.1 for 15 minutes, so not much impression there,
: except the stiffness.
: For me, POG OS tops in the swing weight category among all my match sticks.
| d******x
发帖数: 11837 | 47 同病相怜啊，我也是肘子受不了。。。
6.
【在 b*e 的大作中提到】
: I meant to reply to deltafox's thread. :) he is long time user of classic 6.
: 1 95, which heavy stiff racquet that cause my first occurance of tennis
: eblow that I have to stop tennis for half a year.
|
|
