Tennis版 - Why did Federer lose this year's Wimbledon final? |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G*u
发帖数: 97 | 1 Federer just didn't seal the deal - a deal he created. I see some suggesting
that Djokovic didn't play at his best, well, he wasn't allowed to. Even on
baseline rallies he was being dominated including that monstrous 30 plus
stroke rally, one of the longest ever in a Wimbledon final. But he won the
tie breaks and that's what counted in the end.
All Federer needed to do was to get one good 1st serve on either of those
two match points in the 5th set. And it would not have been unexpected as he
had served his way beautifully throughout and indeed during that game. On
the 1st match point Djokovic sent in a superb deep return which Federer
could only send back with no real pace. But it was the 2nd one which will
rankle Federer as he set up a short ball on his forehand following a decent
2nd serve. 9 times out of 10 he would have placed it deep and got a weak
reply which would have been swatted away. But he hit it a little too short
and got passed. Djokovic got really lucky there.
Overall no question who was the better player. Federer dominated even from
the back but lost on account of those 3 tiebreakers. He didn't even face a
break point till the 4th set. Reminds me of the football world cup quarter
final last year between Brazil and Belgium. Brazil had all the vital numbers
in their favour except that they got only 1 goal to the Belgian's 2. In
sports sometimes the better team or player can end up losing simply because
they failed to capitalize on their superiority. But Federer will be
confident knowing he has the game even at his age to beat Djokovic and Nadal
anywhere except clay. | l****b
发帖数: 400 | 2 说得挺好
suggesting
on
he
【在 G*u 的大作中提到】
: Federer just didn't seal the deal - a deal he created. I see some suggesting
: that Djokovic didn't play at his best, well, he wasn't allowed to. Even on
: baseline rallies he was being dominated including that monstrous 30 plus
: stroke rally, one of the longest ever in a Wimbledon final. But he won the
: tie breaks and that's what counted in the end.
: All Federer needed to do was to get one good 1st serve on either of those
: two match points in the 5th set. And it would not have been unexpected as he
: had served his way beautifully throughout and indeed during that game. On
: the 1st match point Djokovic sent in a superb deep return which Federer
: could only send back with no real pace. But it was the 2nd one which will
| g****t
发帖数: 4493 | 3 费粉就是矫情。如果不是老费主场观众的巨大压力，老德4:2时保发变成5:2，就没这么
多drama了。
每次老费得分或老德失误，摄像机前那几个费粉就跳起来狂呼，把镜头都挡住了。
老德真的太不容易了！ | L*******r
发帖数: 74 | 4 第二个赛点，费老是一发，小德的回球还可以，不是很深，费老正手侧身直线但是没敢
打的太狠所以速度，深度都不够，被轻易穿越，绝不是运气的问题，而是费老心理问题
，可能指望小德穿越失误。
全场比赛，费老优势主要在第2和4盘，另外三盘很平均，实际小德到后来底线相持优势
很大，尤其是反手一侧，很少失误，把老费钉在反手那边没办法。
suggesting
on
he
【在 G*u 的大作中提到】
: Federer just didn't seal the deal - a deal he created. I see some suggesting
: that Djokovic didn't play at his best, well, he wasn't allowed to. Even on
: baseline rallies he was being dominated including that monstrous 30 plus
: stroke rally, one of the longest ever in a Wimbledon final. But he won the
: tie breaks and that's what counted in the end.
: All Federer needed to do was to get one good 1st serve on either of those
: two match points in the 5th set. And it would not have been unexpected as he
: had served his way beautifully throughout and indeed during that game. On
: the 1st match point Djokovic sent in a superb deep return which Federer
: could only send back with no real pace. But it was the 2nd one which will
| L*******r
发帖数: 74 | 5 两个赛点浪费后，观众都像泄气的皮球了，安静了很多，哈哈
【在 g****t 的大作中提到】
: 费粉就是矫情。如果不是老费主场观众的巨大压力，老德4:2时保发变成5:2，就没这么
: 多drama了。
: 每次老费得分或老德失误，摄像机前那几个费粉就跳起来狂呼，把镜头都挡住了。
: 老德真的太不容易了！
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
