u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 1 就是不能看到塞尔维亚人在澳洲土地上成为唯一的goat，超过费纳。就搞这么一手脏事
情。
tennis aus 和维州政府都给了exemption，你联邦政府不同意，是去告这两个机构，迫
害个人做什么？法学院大一该解决的问题。装什么糊涂？自己抗疫不行，就拿德约当道
具演戏。政治真是丑陋。
太恶心了。恶心坏了。
费德勒，不可能再一个title了。20就是max。nadal这一次也许可以 AO一个。但是，法
网要是再拿一个，德约还要赶2个。反正他们的plan就是，德约只能“追”“平”。不
能超越费纳。
挺失望。这种个人英雄主义的项目，里面掺杂这些垃圾。政客果然都是人渣。
更新：
简单来说，澳大利亚政府自己抗疫不利，拿德约来转移矛盾，忽悠老百姓，并且，最大的
目的就是，不能让德约拿下21冠，还是澳网第10冠。拿下了，费纳就是网球运动的优秀
参与者了。一项所谓
贵族运动，goat居然是异族非盟友，肯定吃瘪。今天又向党靠拢了一步。 |
Y****3
发帖数: 963 | 2 袋鼠是一种能够像人类一样站立的动物，对人类行为有极强的模仿力，左一拳西方司法
独立，右一拳东方莫须有，左右互搏。
请观看人与袋鼠之战
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrIS4vTtpig |
g****t
发帖数: 4493 | 3 澳洲律师联合会称这是因言获罪，克伦威尔式的政治迫害。令人担忧！是对言伦自由的
破坏！ |
k******g
发帖数: 224 | |
k******g
发帖数: 224 | |
k******g
发帖数: 224 | |
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 7 https://www.lawyersalliance.com.au/news/djokovic-case-highlights-australias-
arbitrary-and-unfair-border-policies
【在 g****t 的大作中提到】
: 澳洲律师联合会称这是因言获罪，克伦威尔式的政治迫害。令人担忧！是对言伦自由的
: 破坏！
|
S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 8 Never heard in any country immigration policy is under the purview of local
government or sports governing body.
【在 u***8 的大作中提到】
: 就是不能看到塞尔维亚人在澳洲土地上成为唯一的goat，超过费纳。就搞这么一手脏事
: 情。
: tennis aus 和维州政府都给了exemption，你联邦政府不同意，是去告这两个机构，迫
: 害个人做什么？法学院大一该解决的问题。装什么糊涂？自己抗疫不行，就拿德约当道
: 具演戏。政治真是丑陋。
: 太恶心了。恶心坏了。
: 费德勒，不可能再一个title了。20就是max。nadal这一次也许可以 AO一个。但是，法
: 网要是再拿一个，德约还要赶2个。反正他们的plan就是，德约只能“追”“平”。不
: 能超越费纳。
: 挺失望。这种个人英雄主义的项目，里面掺杂这些垃圾。政客果然都是人渣。
|
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 9 Honey，if it is not legal to enter australia with THE exemption, Djokovic
wouldnt have gone.
Your australia Govt never said because IT IS LOCAL EXEMPTION so we denied
your entry.
READ some news and learn some LAW. PLEASE. Otherwise, 你听上去像个农村社会出
来的bug。
local
【在 S**C 的大作中提到】
: Never heard in any country immigration policy is under the purview of local
: government or sports governing body.
|
S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 10 No, It is not legal to enter Australia without a valid visa (not a medical
exemption) for foreigners, and visa can be revoked at the border, or within
the border. Obviously, the decision cannot and should not be arbitrary to
pass legal challenge. At the end of the day, judiciary gives the executive
branch a lot of leeway to decide who can/cannot enter the country, which is
quite different than other legal issues.
The fact the Immigration Minister used public interest and good order,
instead of technical details, as reasons to deny entry leaves Novak a much
narrower path to get his visa reinstated.
【在 u***8 的大作中提到】
: Honey，if it is not legal to enter australia with THE exemption, Djokovic
: wouldnt have gone.
: Your australia Govt never said because IT IS LOCAL EXEMPTION so we denied
: your entry.
: READ some news and learn some LAW. PLEASE. Otherwise, 你听上去像个农村社会出
: 来的bug。
:
: local
|
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 11 Honey, you are not a lawyer or a law student. You are White.
Congrats.
within
is
【在 S**C 的大作中提到】
: No, It is not legal to enter Australia without a valid visa (not a medical
: exemption) for foreigners, and visa can be revoked at the border, or within
: the border. Obviously, the decision cannot and should not be arbitrary to
: pass legal challenge. At the end of the day, judiciary gives the executive
: branch a lot of leeway to decide who can/cannot enter the country, which is
: quite different than other legal issues.
: The fact the Immigration Minister used public interest and good order,
: instead of technical details, as reasons to deny entry leaves Novak a much
: narrower path to get his visa reinstated.
|
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 12 I lost my respect to Australia. |
n*********e
发帖数: 25274 | 13 澳洲高院显然没有美国高院公正。
看来美国可能还有一丝希望。 |
S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 14 US does not have similar cabinet level intervention in place, otherwise the
result most likely will be the same. Essentially, in Djokovic's case, his
legal team needs to prove to the court that the Hawke's decision is
irrational, unreasonable and most of all, **illegal**. It's a very tall
order, and the High Court agreed Hawke's decision was indeed legal, and
appeared to pass on the judgement whether it was right.
【在 n*********e 的大作中提到】
: 澳洲高院显然没有美国高院公正。
: 看来美国可能还有一丝希望。
|
O*********r
发帖数: 1835 | 15 三权分立基本都是这样，最高法院只能在极端情况下（比如违宪）才会干预民选政府（
Executive Branch）的决定。想想前几年川普几乎每个 controversial policy 都被人
告，但一半以上高院还是认可了，因为只要政策没违宪，对错要靠政府负责，大家不满
下一次可以把他们选下来。如果任何政府的difficult decision，都被高院干预，那
Executive Branch 就跛脚了。
澳大利亚法院的决定里有这样一句 "Chief Justice James Allsop said the court
ruling was based on the legality of the minister's decision, not on whether
it was the right decision to make"。
只要合法，政府有权（discretion）做后来复盘看起来是错误的决定，至于对错，这要
大众和选民来判断。 |
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 16 https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%89%AF%E6%80%BB%E7%BB%9F%E4%BC%AF%E5%B0%94%
E5%8F%9B%E5%9B%BD%E6%A1%88
发生在1807年年初的美国第三任副总统伯尔叛国案是杰斐逊执政期间最引人注目的全国
大案之一，案件审理过程中充斥着各种阴谋论。最终，时任最高法法院首席大法官的约
翰·马歇尔引导陪审团做出了无罪判决，为宪法中规定的叛国罪确立了严格的证据要求
，有效避免了这一罪名成为政治迫害的工具。这一判决受到后人极高评价，被认为是司
法的一大胜利。
的确如此。
whether
【在 O*********r 的大作中提到】
: 三权分立基本都是这样，最高法院只能在极端情况下（比如违宪）才会干预民选政府（
: Executive Branch）的决定。想想前几年川普几乎每个 controversial policy 都被人
: 告，但一半以上高院还是认可了，因为只要政策没违宪，对错要靠政府负责，大家不满
: 下一次可以把他们选下来。如果任何政府的difficult decision，都被高院干预，那
: Executive Branch 就跛脚了。
: 澳大利亚法院的决定里有这样一句 "Chief Justice James Allsop said the court
: ruling was based on the legality of the minister's decision, not on whether
: it was the right decision to make"。
: 只要合法，政府有权（discretion）做后来复盘看起来是错误的决定，至于对错，这要
: 大众和选民来判断。
|
b*********0
发帖数: 1441 | 17 another self-righteous low info dickhead trying to cling on moral high
ground while aligning with authoritarian politicians.
morrison caught on video saying the entry is up to victoria government 24
hours before Nole's arrival.
Hawke revoked Djokovic's visa Friday “on health and good order grounds”.
Then
Hawke conceded the unvaccinated Djokovic entered Australia with a valid
medical exemption and poses a low risk of contracting the virus while in
Australia and passing it on to others
After losing the first appeal in their own court, one of the Australian
government lawyer's main arguments against him now in the second revoke is
that he may become "an icon of free choice".
Vaccines do save lives, do not stop transmission, people should have the
choice, especially in groups like pregnant women and athletes etc.
Government incompetence and politician shitshows never surprise me. but
stupidity among brain washed sheeple absolutely pisses me off.
the
【在 S**C 的大作中提到】
: US does not have similar cabinet level intervention in place, otherwise the
: result most likely will be the same. Essentially, in Djokovic's case, his
: legal team needs to prove to the court that the Hawke's decision is
: irrational, unreasonable and most of all, **illegal**. It's a very tall
: order, and the High Court agreed Hawke's decision was indeed legal, and
: appeared to pass on the judgement whether it was right.
|
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 18 Thanks.
an icon of free choice. ------- 这成为revoke visa的理由？很搞笑啊
【在 b*********0 的大作中提到】
: another self-righteous low info dickhead trying to cling on moral high
: ground while aligning with authoritarian politicians.
: morrison caught on video saying the entry is up to victoria government 24
: hours before Nole's arrival.
: Hawke revoked Djokovic's visa Friday “on health and good order grounds”.
: Then
: Hawke conceded the unvaccinated Djokovic entered Australia with a valid
: medical exemption and poses a low risk of contracting the virus while in
: Australia and passing it on to others
: After losing the first appeal in their own court, one of the Australian
|
f******8
发帖数: 70 | 19 呵呵，澳洲政府可能早就算好了利用小德挽回些声望。在小德入境时故意高调搞事，不
给小德入境，被法官否决。然后故意等周五最后一刻行使移民部长的权利。成功驱逐小
德。 |
S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 20 Is Hawke revoking Novak's visa a legal decision according to Aussie law? Of
course it is. Don't like Liberal Party government? Vote them out. Don't want
give Immigration Minister that much power? Change the law. Vote more pols
aligned with your positions, be activists, run campaigns, be volunteers,
protest peacefully, donate... but until the law changes, cry me a river.
【在 b*********0 的大作中提到】
: another self-righteous low info dickhead trying to cling on moral high
: ground while aligning with authoritarian politicians.
: morrison caught on video saying the entry is up to victoria government 24
: hours before Nole's arrival.
: Hawke revoked Djokovic's visa Friday “on health and good order grounds”.
: Then
: Hawke conceded the unvaccinated Djokovic entered Australia with a valid
: medical exemption and poses a low risk of contracting the virus while in
: Australia and passing it on to others
: After losing the first appeal in their own court, one of the Australian
|
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 21 是的。你说的没错。但是，内阁部长使用粗鲁直接行政权力，拒绝网坛地位类似文艺复
兴三杰之一的达芬奇的德约参加自己国家的比赛，以此来达到转移自己抗疫不利的注意
力，这就是政客的丑陋了。
这都不算是他的第一目的。他有个更大的，“一盘大棋”的目的，代表了这个星球的一
个族裔。
你貌似是一个很懂西方，很尊重人权的人。可是，1）为什么就是特别针对德约这个非
西方盟友体系的普通球员？的确是普通，你数学好，你也是普通公民，你是陶泽轩，也
是普通公民。你是德约，球打得好，就该死？德约，现在不是被拒绝入境了么？他有什
么特权？他拿exemption，是靠合法程序，手段，他有valid visa。澳洲pm自己入境前
一天说了，可以入境。
2）请问，世界第一球手，不参加的澳网，算不算世界顶级网球赛？ 没有塞尚参加的巴
黎画展，是几流画展，没有萨特参加的沙龙，算几流沙龙，没有达芬奇，文艺复兴算几
流的复兴？
3）一个国家办一个国际有声誉的赛事，可是，凭借着举办国优势，居然让一个球员。
不。能。参。赛！不是黑哨，连吹黑哨干掉他的自信都没有。直接不准参赛。而这个球
员，很大可能马上超过瑞士人，西班牙人，这不得不让人怀疑，你的移民部长的决定，
是不是另有所图。是不是不能看着塞尔维亚人超越你的盟友的族裔？
简简单单的事实，黑压压的乌合之众，网络上的带节奏，让人又一次看穿了西方的虚伪
，又支持了共产党20分。
要是federer，nadal，甚至其他人，2020 US open，打中线审，是不是抱一抱，笑一笑
就过了？
要是murray，你澳大利亚会不会revoke 他的签证？（英国护照可以免visa入境，可是
来打球，赚钱的，还是需要visa的）。
不说这些最牛逼的，就算是个锦织圭这种日本选手，世界2 3 流的，你会这么刁难么？
这种2 3 流对费纳没威胁的。
行为越卑鄙，那么，越辩解，就越可恶。
Of
want
【在 S**C 的大作中提到】
: Is Hawke revoking Novak's visa a legal decision according to Aussie law? Of
: course it is. Don't like Liberal Party government? Vote them out. Don't want
: give Immigration Minister that much power? Change the law. Vote more pols
: aligned with your positions, be activists, run campaigns, be volunteers,
: protest peacefully, donate... but until the law changes, cry me a river.
|
U******u
发帖数: 5829 | 22
看来某些德粉脑残胡搅蛮缠到可以无视法律。司法移民部海关与澳网压根不是一个体系
。小德造假、欺骗被发现，不管先前给签证与否，海关移民局一旦发现有绝对权力扣押
和驱逐出境，不管哪个国家都是如此。 |
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 23 造假什么？欺骗什么？有link，看看么？
您也是学医的，知道要实证。满嘴跑火车不好使的。对吧
【在 U******u 的大作中提到】
:
: 看来某些德粉脑残胡搅蛮缠到可以无视法律。司法移民部海关与澳网压根不是一个体系
: 。小德造假、欺骗被发现，不管先前给签证与否，海关移民局一旦发现有绝对权力扣押
: 和驱逐出境，不管哪个国家都是如此。
|
S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 24 Australia government mishandled the saga and created the mess, no question
about it. They should deny Djokovic visa application and be done with it.
They didn’t. But they are not obliged to stay on that path, in the face of
public outcry and surging Omicron no less, when the current laws offer them
a fast exit ramp. Of course, pols do things for political reasons, all pols
do that all the time, that is who they are. Unless they enticed Djokovic
into this circus, it’s fair although unfortunate. If TA misled Djokovic, I
hope he sue them to the full extent.
To make allegation that Djokovic was targeted, one need to establish such
fact that unvaccined foreigners regularly got admitted. I don’t think it is
the case here. It is questionable if ordinary unvaccined foreigners can get
visa at the first place. I did not follow what PM said one days before
Djokovic’s arrival, citation needed. PM is not the king, he may fire
Immigration Minister, but he doesn’t manage immigration policy.
There were great players called it a career at their prime, the sports didn
’t miss a step. We also don’t add asterisk to champions if the top ranked
player/team didn’t participate for whatever reason. It just doesn’t matter.
Djokovic knew the rule, he could take the jab, or not but had to accept the
consequences. The rule is not installed for him, it was there for a while,
and he knew it.
Again, you will have to establish that fact that someone hit the referee and
got away with it rather than getting disqualified to make that allegation
regarding 2020 US Open. Murray and almost all ATP top players get the jab
BTW.
See, you made a lot allegation/conspiracy but has nothing to back it up.
【在 u***8 的大作中提到】
: 是的。你说的没错。但是，内阁部长使用粗鲁直接行政权力，拒绝网坛地位类似文艺复
: 兴三杰之一的达芬奇的德约参加自己国家的比赛，以此来达到转移自己抗疫不利的注意
: 力，这就是政客的丑陋了。
: 这都不算是他的第一目的。他有个更大的，“一盘大棋”的目的，代表了这个星球的一
: 个族裔。
: 你貌似是一个很懂西方，很尊重人权的人。可是，1）为什么就是特别针对德约这个非
: 西方盟友体系的普通球员？的确是普通，你数学好，你也是普通公民，你是陶泽轩，也
: 是普通公民。你是德约，球打得好，就该死？德约，现在不是被拒绝入境了么？他有什
: 么特权？他拿exemption，是靠合法程序，手段，他有valid visa。澳洲pm自己入境前
: 一天说了，可以入境。
|
q******j
发帖数: 577 | 25 是很恶心，Legal但是恶心，莫里斯这个政客就一副我是流氓我怕谁的嘴脸，公共利益
我说了算，让你吃亏还告不赢 |
n*********e
发帖数: 25274 | 26 澳大利亚完全抄美国作业，越抄越离谱，新冠疫苗接种率最高，新冠患者同时新高，疫
苗仿佛是新冠的催化剂，让人怀疑近期打的是真病毒。。。。 |
a*******y
发帖数: 199 | 27 不管怎么样，我不认为应该让德约参加比赛。本人也从此不再粉他。 |
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 28 好走，不送。
【在 a*******y 的大作中提到】
: 不管怎么样，我不认为应该让德约参加比赛。本人也从此不再粉他。
|
n*********e
发帖数: 25274 | 29 没问题，也有更多前德黑开始粉老德，包括名人土著。
【在 a*******y 的大作中提到】
: 不管怎么样，我不认为应该让德约参加比赛。本人也从此不再粉他。
|
s**e
发帖数: 1834 | 30 土著喜欢不按常理出牌爱博人眼球，所以他无论是之前骂小德还是现在又挺小德了，可
以当个热闹看看，但不必太当真。
【在 n*********e 的大作中提到】
: 没问题，也有更多前德黑开始粉老德，包括名人土著。
|
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 31 可是少一个title，这是真的啊。
【在 s**e 的大作中提到】
: 土著喜欢不按常理出牌爱博人眼球，所以他无论是之前骂小德还是现在又挺小德了，可
: 以当个热闹看看，但不必太当真。
|
b*********0
发帖数: 1441 | 32 so...people on US bbs give a crouching tiger flying f**k about which version
of clown variant government the aussie has? you want americans to run
campaign for exactly what in australia? Is this drunk and posting? or
running out of legit response for a fountain of policy inconsistency by the
dumb aussie government saga that I listed earlier, and desperately
scrambling together some words to save face?
Of
want
【在 S**C 的大作中提到】
: Is Hawke revoking Novak's visa a legal decision according to Aussie law? Of
: course it is. Don't like Liberal Party government? Vote them out. Don't want
: give Immigration Minister that much power? Change the law. Vote more pols
: aligned with your positions, be activists, run campaigns, be volunteers,
: protest peacefully, donate... but until the law changes, cry me a river.
|
k*******r
发帖数: 16963 | 33 移民部长取消签证根本就没有提到“造假”和“欺骗”，你个傻逼真是下贱
【在 U******u 的大作中提到】
:
: 看来某些德粉脑残胡搅蛮缠到可以无视法律。司法移民部海关与澳网压根不是一个体系
: 。小德造假、欺骗被发现，不管先前给签证与否，海关移民局一旦发现有绝对权力扣押
: 和驱逐出境，不管哪个国家都是如此。
|
S*****i
发帖数: 3374 | 34 那是放他一马，不然就不是取消签证这么简单了，要坐牢了
【在 k*******r 的大作中提到】
: 移民部长取消签证根本就没有提到“造假”和“欺骗”，你个傻逼真是下贱
|
b*********0
发帖数: 1441 | 35 the same people so sure of Djoker faking his COVID positive test to gain the
exemption without a shred of evidence can put on a straight face and
request evidence for politicians playing dirty politics on a disposable
foreigner to win
political points...otherwise it's conspiracy!
look up the word hypocrisy in dictionary
of course he was not targeted, because 3 people entered with the same
medical exemption and visa, but only joker was locked up. guess what is more
sensible? after the other two people were told the exemption was not legit
and were forced to leave, hawke came out to admit the exemption is valid.
LOL
people like you never lose, you always win the argument one way or the other
, and you are always moral, legal and ethical on the right side of the
history.
Was not a Nole fan before, will support him from now.
of
them
pols
I
is
【在 S**C 的大作中提到】
: Australia government mishandled the saga and created the mess, no question
: about it. They should deny Djokovic visa application and be done with it.
: They didn’t. But they are not obliged to stay on that path, in the face of
: public outcry and surging Omicron no less, when the current laws offer them
: a fast exit ramp. Of course, pols do things for political reasons, all pols
: do that all the time, that is who they are. Unless they enticed Djokovic
: into this circus, it’s fair although unfortunate. If TA misled Djokovic, I
: hope he sue them to the full extent.
: To make allegation that Djokovic was targeted, one need to establish such
: fact that unvaccined foreigners regularly got admitted. I don’t think it is
|
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 36 叹息。 你迫害别人，没别的理由了，扯出公公利益，然后你还说，“我在放你一马”。
澳大利亚能让德约坐牢，会只取消签证么？您的童话什么时候出版啊
【在 S*****i 的大作中提到】
: 那是放他一马，不然就不是取消签证这么简单了，要坐牢了
|
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 37 说出了我的心声。
【在 k*******r 的大作中提到】
: 移民部长取消签证根本就没有提到“造假”和“欺骗”，你个傻逼真是下贱
|
S*****i
发帖数: 3374 | 38 德约入境撒谎，不打疫苗，阳性后违反防疫规定接受采访参加活动，这么多丑闻你还能
倒打一耙说人家陷害他。你歇歇吧，德约完全是自己作的
”。
【在 u***8 的大作中提到】
: 叹息。 你迫害别人，没别的理由了，扯出公公利益，然后你还说，“我在放你一马”。
: 澳大利亚能让德约坐牢，会只取消签证么？您的童话什么时候出版啊
|
S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 39 Did you point finger at me? I never said Djokervic lied. The closest thing I
said about him is "he is either a liar or a sociopath", that was about a
weeks ago or so when more details surfaced, and I stand by what I said. He
is not a liar it turns out, he is a sociopath, knowingly attended public
events and did interview with COVID positive.
Had I request anyone provide evidence for Hawke and the bunch playing
politics? No. Pols play politics, that is what they do, they need to win
elections, and when they see real or perceived outrage from their
constituency, they change course, especially when their laws happen to
afford them an off-ramp. If the Aussies are not happy, they can vote 'em out
at the ballot box. If the Aussies want to strip Immigration Minister the
power to revoke visa, they can change the law. What I do request evidence is
someone hit referee but get away with it, or Rafa will be able to enter
Australia without vaccination. Frankly I don't know anyone can provide such
evidence since Rafa was vaccinated.
Djokervic could fly under the radar if he is nobody, but when a celebrity
drew attention to himself, it naturally generated public response, in this
case, strong negative one, and the pols had to react. You want pols ignore
their constituency, do you? What Hawke did is perfectly within his authority
set forth by their law, and the law can be changed, the pols can be removed
at the ballot box, if the Aussie so wish.
I have no skin in the game. Whether Djokervic can play in AO '22 or not, how
many Slam titles will he be able to get when he hangs up his racket etc.
etc., doesn't impact me one bit. If anything, I am interested in the legal
aspect of the drama. I said when Hawke pulled out his trump card, Djokervic
then had a very narrow path. It turned out I was correct.
the
more
legit
【在 b*********0 的大作中提到】
: the same people so sure of Djoker faking his COVID positive test to gain the
: exemption without a shred of evidence can put on a straight face and
: request evidence for politicians playing dirty politics on a disposable
: foreigner to win
: political points...otherwise it's conspiracy!
: look up the word hypocrisy in dictionary
: of course he was not targeted, because 3 people entered with the same
: medical exemption and visa, but only joker was locked up. guess what is more
: sensible? after the other two people were told the exemption was not legit
: and were forced to leave, hawke came out to admit the exemption is valid.
|
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 40 同学，“德约入境撒谎”，法院为什么不判啊？！！！！！澳洲司法都被德约收买了么
？澳洲法院说他入境撒谎了么？求出处啊。你觉得他撒谎，不算啊！我还觉得你的帖子
在撒谎，出门该被车撞死，警察不需要调查。所以，如果你被撞死了，警察就真的不管
么？
“不打疫苗” ------ 没毛病啊。 这个是选择。天赋人权啊。
“阳性后违反防疫规定接受采访参加活动” ------ 这件事情，发生在哪里啊？关你澳
洲政府的事情么？安德鲁王子在伦敦草17岁少女，这个美国司法可以管。 德约的事情
，谁来执法？是您这SJW么？这事情，发生在哪里？哪个国家法律违反了？怎么不告啊
？这个国家这么腐败？有人违法，不告，不检，不判？
同学，“丑闻”，这件事情，是要法院实锤了，才能叫丑闻。或者是，违反了约定俗成
的社会契约。
问题是，现在世界上，川普的机会，不打疫苗，不戴口罩的，没问题啊。 在中国娶2个
老婆，算丑闻，在沙特就不算啊。互相指责对方了么？
不要把你的世界观，加诸于别人身上，好么？管好你自己啊。
明明白白的连超越费纳的机会都不给，赛场都不让上。盎撒下手这么粗鄙丑陋，这都能
洗地啊。。。。
佩服咯。自己口口声声的fair play。结果是，没有play，就无法超越。GOAT 3，NOT
GOAT 1.
【在 S*****i 的大作中提到】
: 德约入境撒谎，不打疫苗，阳性后违反防疫规定接受采访参加活动，这么多丑闻你还能
: 倒打一耙说人家陷害他。你歇歇吧，德约完全是自己作的
:
: ”。
|
g*y
发帖数: 2354 | 41 明白人。法官那里问题不大，联邦政府的决定才真正是controversial
whether
【在 O*********r 的大作中提到】
: 三权分立基本都是这样，最高法院只能在极端情况下（比如违宪）才会干预民选政府（
: Executive Branch）的决定。想想前几年川普几乎每个 controversial policy 都被人
: 告，但一半以上高院还是认可了，因为只要政策没违宪，对错要靠政府负责，大家不满
: 下一次可以把他们选下来。如果任何政府的difficult decision，都被高院干预，那
: Executive Branch 就跛脚了。
: 澳大利亚法院的决定里有这样一句 "Chief Justice James Allsop said the court
: ruling was based on the legality of the minister's decision, not on whether
: it was the right decision to make"。
: 只要合法，政府有权（discretion）做后来复盘看起来是错误的决定，至于对错，这要
: 大众和选民来判断。
|
u***8
发帖数: 1581 | 42 是。骂的就是他总理部长下作。
【在 g*y 的大作中提到】
: 明白人。法官那里问题不大，联邦政府的决定才真正是controversial
:
: whether
|
