c*****g 发帖数: 3871 | 1 It removes the duty to retreat from buildings and vehicles. No longer do
you have to try to retreat before retaliating.
It creates a legal assumption that an intruder is there to cause death
or great bodily harm and that victims have the right to use deadly force.
再加上堡垒法做靠山,感觉不说更安全,至少保护自己的时候不用太顾忌
以前在另外的州,说正确做法是别人breakin了,你要退回到卧室,还要高声警告,否
则不能开枪 ... ,这都是哪个混蛋法官想出来的啊
现在只要是自己的地界,感觉受到威胁就可以反击了,很好 |
p********7 发帖数: 18007 | 2 Thanks for this important info! |
b*******g 发帖数: 1095 | 3 还有就是在德州如果刑事案输了民事不得起诉。
do
【在 c*****g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : It removes the duty to retreat from buildings and vehicles. No longer do : you have to try to retreat before retaliating. : It creates a legal assumption that an intruder is there to cause death : or great bodily harm and that victims have the right to use deadly force. : 再加上堡垒法做靠山,感觉不说更安全,至少保护自己的时候不用太顾忌 : 以前在另外的州,说正确做法是别人breakin了,你要退回到卧室,还要高声警告,否 : 则不能开枪 ... ,这都是哪个混蛋法官想出来的啊 : 现在只要是自己的地界,感觉受到威胁就可以反击了,很好
|
b*****l 发帖数: 2903 | 4 有这么好的事?那在德州开枪自卫基本不会破产了!
【在 b*******g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 还有就是在德州如果刑事案输了民事不得起诉。 : : do
|