q*****n
发帖数: 195 | 1 说是如果第一次去argue后背否，那么就按argue时的评估价报税。
都明白人说说看，这种是不是以后没人敢去argue了。 | K*****3
发帖数: 977 | 2 protest的时候可能涨价，这个确实会打消很多人的愿望。至少得更有说服力才成。
当然，理论上，地产税金额是和地方政府开销挂钩的。估价高了，税率应该降低。但是
从中国的经验，有钱不赚的政府不是好政府。
【在 q*****n 的大作中提到】
: 说是如果第一次去argue后背否，那么就按argue时的评估价报税。
: 都明白人说说看，这种是不是以后没人敢去argue了。
| d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 3 你完全看反了吧
【在 q*****n 的大作中提到】
: 说是如果第一次去argue后背否，那么就按argue时的评估价报税。
: 都明白人说说看，这种是不是以后没人敢去argue了。
| q*****n
发帖数: 195 | 4 没有啊
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: 你完全看反了吧
| d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 5 AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT
Property owners who believe their local appraisal district has over
appraised their property have
the option of protesting this assessment before their local appraisal review
board. However, the
current protest system is unfairly biased in favor of the appraisal district.
Many property owners are currently discouraged from protesting their
assessment for fear that an
appraisal review board could increase the assessed value of their property
during a protest
hearing. This is fundamentally flawed and is comparable to contesting a
speeding ticket and then
having the speed alleged to be driven be further increased by a court.
Moreover, the current procedure of protest hearings prevents property owners
from having an
informed opportunity to protest their assessment. Complicated and complex
codes and values
provided to property owners before a protest hearing do little to empower
those who protest to
have a fair chance to persuade the appraisal review board that their
property was incorrectly
assessed.
S.B. 1767 seeks to provide protections for property owners who choose to
protest their
assessments by preventing additional increases in assessments without
consent and guaranteeing
an opportunity to respond to the evidence used to determine the value of
their property.
S.B. 1767 also seeks to remedy the inherent advantage currently held by the
appraisal district by
providing a protestor with the option to present his or her evidence and
argument before, after, or
between the cases presented by the chief appraiser and each taxing unit. (
Original Author’s /
Sponsor’s Statement of Intent)
S.B. 1767 amends current law relating to hearings and protests before
appraisal review boards
involving ad valorem tax determinations.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a
state officer,
institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Section 25.25(e), Tax Code, to entitle the property owner
to elect to
present the owner's evidence and argument before, after, or between the
cases presented by the
chief appraiser and each taxing unit.
SECTION 2. Amends Section 41.66(b), Tax Code, to entitle a property owner
who is a party to a
protest to elect to present the owner's case at a hearing on the protest
either before or after the
appraisal district presents the district's case.
SECTION 3. Provides that the change in law made by this Act to Section 25.25
, Tax Code,
applies only to a motion to correct an appraisal roll filed on or after the
effective date of this Act.
SECTION 4. Makes application of Section 41.66, Tax Code, as amended by this
Act,
prospective.
【在 q*****n 的大作中提到】
: 没有啊
| q*******r
发帖数: 59 | 6 Protest是不会造成评估价上涨的，不然成了county自己打自己脸了
[在 qinyuan (qinyuan) 的大作中提到：]
:说是如果第一次去argue后背否，那么就按argue时的评估价报税。
:都明白人说说看，这种是不是以后没人敢去argue了。 | m********s
发帖数: 55301 | 7 有人会愿意自己降薪水吗？
没有。
所以，地税必须涨
【在 q*******r 的大作中提到】
: Protest是不会造成评估价上涨的，不然成了county自己打自己脸了
: [在 qinyuan (qinyuan) 的大作中提到：]
: :说是如果第一次去argue后背否，那么就按argue时的评估价报税。
: :都明白人说说看，这种是不是以后没人敢去argue了。
|
|
