c**n
发帖数: 566 | 1 "god in bible made people eat human flesh..."
zhaowendao made a conclusion: this god is evil.
most christians reply back: there are context...
is CONTEXT really needed here? |
b********h
发帖数: 2451 | 2 当然。
圣经此文的作者，把此书收入圣经的编辑者，必然是在一个更大的context下看待这个
问题的，否则为何要自打嘴巴，要证明这个神是evil?
【在 c**n 的大作中提到】
: "god in bible made people eat human flesh..."
: zhaowendao made a conclusion: this god is evil.
: most christians reply back: there are context...
: is CONTEXT really needed here?
|
b*****n
发帖数: 4976 | 3
==============================
为甚么不要看 context?
不看 context....只会九不搭八
例如:
Ｑ∶In which battle did Napoleon die?
Ａ∶* his last battle
Ｑ∶Where was the Declaration of Independence signed?
Ａ∶* at the bottom of the page
Ｑ∶How can a man go eight days without sleeping ?
Ａ∶* No problem, he sleeps at night.
Ｑ∶How can you drop a raw egg onto a concrete floor without cracking it?
Ａ∶*Any way you want, concrete floors are very hard to crack.
基本上是无答错， but.... totally out of context.
这就是老七的读经法。 白痴程度，无可救药。
吃药都是在浪费资源。
【在 c**n 的大作中提到】
: "god in bible made people eat human flesh..."
: zhaowendao made a conclusion: this god is evil.
: most christians reply back: there are context...
: is CONTEXT really needed here?
|
