boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
TrustInJesus版 - What Love is This?(67)加尔文主义定义的邪神
相关主题
Why calvinism's "Totoal Depravity" is wrong ZT
What Love is This?(65)上帝的话是真诚的吗?
What Love is This?(66)加尔文也说不清的“全然败坏”
What Love is This?(77)上帝放弃了世人吗?
What Love is This?(88)神的主权与人的责任
What Love is This?(25) sin city
verse again Calvinism's Total depravity
Calvinism Debate - Total Depravity Part 1
Calvinism Debate - Total Depravity Part 2
What Love is This?(45)宗教恐怖背后的错误信条
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: god话题: he话题: christ话题: man话题: truth
进入TrustInJesus版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
R*o
发帖数: 3781
1
Faced With A Choice
Calvinists object to the assertion that the natural man is "not so totally d
epraved that he can't hear God's voice and come to Christ." They respond, "T
otally depraved is totally depraved. It makes no sense to say man isn't so t
otally depraved." Not only is Total Depravity not a biblical concept, but as
the quote above shows, Calvin himself said that man is not so totally depra
ved that he cannot receive much truth from God; he just doesn't get enough t
ruth because God withholds it. Why? Calvin says God withholds truth in order
"to render man inexcusable . . . ." That is like crippling a man to render
him inexcusable for failing to run fast enough and to jump high enough!
Calvin says that truth comes only from the Spirit of truth, so whatever trut
h man has is received from God. Then if God gives man some truth, why doesn'
t He give him enough to know and seek God? Is God limited, that He can only
give a limited amount of truth? Surely God can give man as much truth as He
desires to give. Calvin cannot show us that man naturally has a capacity for
this much truth but not for that much. How was depravity redefined as an in
capacity which isn't total but is just enough to damn the soul? There is not
hing anywhere in Scripture to support such speculation.
When Peter confessed to Jesus, "Thou art the Christ," Jesus told him, "Flesh
and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven
(Matthew 16:15-17). Peter must have been a totally depraved natural man when
the Father revealed Christ to him. Surely he hadn't yet been born of the Sp
irit. Though he acknowledged Jesus as the Christ, he still lacked any unders
tanding about Christ dying for his sins. Could not the Father, therefore, re
veal Christ to everyone as He did to Peter? Why not? Clearly Peter had a rev
elation from the Father concerning Christ before he was regenerated.
For all the importance Calvinism places upon the doctrine of Total Depravity
, inasmuch as that is the condition of all mankind and the elect are deliver
ed out of it, being totally depraved is not what keeps men in darkness after
all, but God's withholding the needed light. The lost are kept out of heave
n not by their sin, but by God withholding the grace they need for salvation
, because He has already predestined them to eternal torment.
Given what the Bible tells us of God's dealings with man and Calvinism's doc
trine of man's inability to believe, there are only two choices: either to c
harge the Infinite God with acting insincerely and in limited love and limit
ed grace, or to admit that Calvinism is in error. In fact, this leads to ano
ther conclusion just as devastating to Calvinism, to be considered in the ne
xt chapter.
1 (共1页)
进入TrustInJesus版参与讨论
相关主题
What Love is This?(45)宗教恐怖背后的错误信条
What Love is This?(27)火烧塞尔维特
What Love is This?(50)加尔文主义的根基在于"重生先于信心"
What Love is This?(87) 愿上帝拣选更多!
Question: "Calvinism vs. Arminianism - which view is correct?"
What Love is This?(51)荒谬的"重生先于信心"
What Love is This?(80)获罪下地狱,还是预定下地狱?
What Love is This?(14) Calvin's gospel
Calvinism is a cult zz
Oct 4 信心的支票簿 Faith's check book (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: god话题: he话题: christ话题: man话题: truth