N**V 发帖数: 220 | 1 The Erosion of Authority Scripture alone is the inerrant rule of the church'
s life, but the evangelical church today has separated Scripture from its
authoritative function. In practice, the church is guided, far too often, by
the culture. Therapeutic technique, marketing strategies, and the beat of
the entertainment world often have far more to say about what the church
wants, how it functions and what it offers, than does the Word of God.
Pastors have neglected their rightful oversight of worship, including the
doctrinal content of the music. As biblical authority has been abandoned in
practice, as its truths have faded from Christian consciousness, and as its
doctrines have lost their saliency, the church has been increasingly emptied
of its integrity, moral authority and direction.
Rather than adapting Christian faith to satisfy the felt needs of consumers,
we must proclaim the law as the only measure of true righteousness and the
gospel as the only announcement of saving truth. Biblical truth is
indispensable to the church's understanding, nurture and discipline.
Scripture must take us beyond our perceived needs to our real needs and
liberate us from seeing ourselves through the seductive images, cliches,
promises and priorities of mass culture. It is only in the light of God's
truth that we understand ourselves aright and see God's provision for our
need. The Bible, therefore, must be taught and preached in the church.
Sermons must be expositions of the Bible and its teachings, not expressions
of the preacher's opinions or the ideas of the age. We must settle for
nothing less than what God has given.
The work of the Holy Spirit in personal experience cannot be disengaged from
Scripture. The Spirit does not speak in ways that are independent of
Scripture. Apart from Scripture we would never have known of God's grace in
Christ. The biblical Word, rather than spiritual experience, is the test of
truth.
http://www.monergism.com/directory/link_category/Five-Solas/Sol | s******l 发帖数: 6898 | 2 我没看出来。
我看您宁愿唯独信经,也不愿意唯独圣经。
罗马书
9 你若口里认耶稣为主,心里信神叫他从死里复活,就必得救。
10 因为人心里相信,就可以称义。口里承认,就可以得救。 | G*******s 发帖数: 4956 | 3 信经是圣经真理的一个很好的诠释,可以把异端和正统分辨出来
信经正式根据圣经真理,总结分辨对圣经不同的认识的观点,而最后总结出来的。
很多人因为本神就不信,于是就以“圣经”为借口来反对从圣经而来的信经,其实是大
错特错了。异端的所有类似做法都是徒劳无功的。
反对信经的人无非也就是说说而已,其实完全可以根据圣经重新在论证一遍,结果还是
信经总结的内容。跟信经总结的不一致的仍旧还是不符合圣经,属于异端的。
请原谅我必须要用异端这个词,因为信经就是用来分辨异端的。
【在 s******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 我没看出来。 : 我看您宁愿唯独信经,也不愿意唯独圣经。 : 罗马书 : 9 你若口里认耶稣为主,心里信神叫他从死里复活,就必得救。 : 10 因为人心里相信,就可以称义。口里承认,就可以得救。
| s******l 发帖数: 6898 | 4 三位一体,圣经中就没有。要是唯独圣经,不相信三位一体的一样得救。
你以信经作为评判标准,把信经的权威举得高过圣经。这样合适吗?
罗马书,您自然是不信的了。 | G*******s 发帖数: 4956 | 5 敢张大嘴说圣经中没有三位一体教义的,除了异端,恐怕就是你们不信的新派了
【在 s******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 三位一体,圣经中就没有。要是唯独圣经,不相信三位一体的一样得救。 : 你以信经作为评判标准,把信经的权威举得高过圣经。这样合适吗? : 罗马书,您自然是不信的了。
| s******l 发帖数: 6898 | 6 你倒说说哪里有?
【在 G*******s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 敢张大嘴说圣经中没有三位一体教义的,除了异端,恐怕就是你们不信的新派了
| G*******s 发帖数: 4956 | 7 正本圣经66卷从头到尾都有
【在 s******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 你倒说说哪里有?
| t*******d 发帖数: 2570 | 8 霍同学又上新马甲了。
church'
by
in
its
emptied
【在 N**V 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : The Erosion of Authority Scripture alone is the inerrant rule of the church' : s life, but the evangelical church today has separated Scripture from its : authoritative function. In practice, the church is guided, far too often, by : the culture. Therapeutic technique, marketing strategies, and the beat of : the entertainment world often have far more to say about what the church : wants, how it functions and what it offers, than does the Word of God. : Pastors have neglected their rightful oversight of worship, including the : doctrinal content of the music. As biblical authority has been abandoned in : practice, as its truths have faded from Christian consciousness, and as its : doctrines have lost their saliency, the church has been increasingly emptied
| s******l 发帖数: 6898 | 9 那我们从头说:
《创世记》 1:1 起初 神创造天地。
《创世记》 1:2 地是空虚混沌,渊面黑暗; 神的灵运行在水面上。
《创世记》 1:3 神说:“要有光。”就有了光。
《创世记》 1:4 神看光是好的,就把光暗分开了。
《创世记》 1:5 神称光为昼,称暗为夜。有晚上,有早晨,这是头一日。
请问三位一体在哪里?
【在 G*******s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 正本圣经66卷从头到尾都有
| j*******7 发帖数: 6300 | 10 Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God (原文是:Elohim) created the heavens and
the earth.
One of the places supporters of the doctrine of the Trinity point when
looking for the Trinity in the Old Testament is the Hebrew word "Elohim".
This word, which is translated as "God" in English, is a plural word, and
not just a plural but a plural indicating three or more.
And I know the Bible always uses singular adjectives and singular verbs
with Elohim.
【在 s******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 那我们从头说: : 《创世记》 1:1 起初 神创造天地。 : 《创世记》 1:2 地是空虚混沌,渊面黑暗; 神的灵运行在水面上。 : 《创世记》 1:3 神说:“要有光。”就有了光。 : 《创世记》 1:4 神看光是好的,就把光暗分开了。 : 《创世记》 1:5 神称光为昼,称暗为夜。有晚上,有早晨,这是头一日。 : 请问三位一体在哪里?
|
|