D*****r 发帖数: 6791 | 1 不少信基督的,就像理智上被骟过的马一样。
到处炫耀自己能干活,住大棚子,跟其他骟过的马关系良好,恨不得所有马都被骟。 |
N*******8 发帖数: 1449 | 2 也只有马才能对马的心思意念如此熟悉.
你这是在这里炫耀自己是一匹没有骟过的马吗?
【在 D*****r 的大作中提到】 : 不少信基督的,就像理智上被骟过的马一样。 : 到处炫耀自己能干活,住大棚子,跟其他骟过的马关系良好,恨不得所有马都被骟。
|
x*a 发帖数: 4968 | 3 纠正一处语病:理智上就像被骟过的马一样。
头两个词颠倒了,意思就没到位。 |
z********o 发帖数: 18304 | 4 比喻其实并不恰当。
被骟过的马确实能干活。而基们无论是在道德水平还是智力水平等等上面都不如常人。 |
x*a 发帖数: 4968 | 5 承认我们意淫的水平的确不如您。
【在 z********o 的大作中提到】 : 比喻其实并不恰当。 : 被骟过的马确实能干活。而基们无论是在道德水平还是智力水平等等上面都不如常人。
|
z********o 发帖数: 18304 | 6
不要喊口号。说说看,你认为基督徒们的道德水平比常人高吗?有什么证据?
【在 x*a 的大作中提到】 : 承认我们意淫的水平的确不如您。
|
w*********r 发帖数: 3382 | 7 只讲数据,不讲口号,呵呵
【在 z********o 的大作中提到】 : : 不要喊口号。说说看,你认为基督徒们的道德水平比常人高吗?有什么证据?
|
w*********r 发帖数: 3382 | |
x*a 发帖数: 4968 | 9 各人追求不同。
你追求IQ,他追求EQ,我追求幸福喜乐平安。
你追到了你想追的,恭喜。
而已。 |
N*******8 发帖数: 1449 | |
|
|
N*******8 发帖数: 1449 | |
z********o 发帖数: 18304 | 12
不像你这样自欺欺人就不能获得“幸福喜乐平安”么?
【在 x*a 的大作中提到】 : 各人追求不同。 : 你追求IQ,他追求EQ,我追求幸福喜乐平安。 : 你追到了你想追的,恭喜。 : 而已。
|
N*******8 发帖数: 1449 | 13 Butter production in Bangladesh has one of the highest correlation with the
S&P 500 over a ten year period. |
w*********r 发帖数: 3382 | 14 what are you trying to say then?
correlation is correlation ...
are you saying they are completely random and has nothing whatsoever to do
with each other?
the
【在 N*******8 的大作中提到】 : Butter production in Bangladesh has one of the highest correlation with the : S&P 500 over a ten year period.
|
l**********t 发帖数: 5754 | 15 good one... .
不过你要想让一些非基明白 correlation and causality 的关系, 可能有点难。
the
【在 N*******8 的大作中提到】 : Butter production in Bangladesh has one of the highest correlation with the : S&P 500 over a ten year period.
|
w*********r 发帖数: 3382 | 16 pssss, when did i ever CONCLUDE that there is causal relationship?
i simply pointed out that there is a correlation, and that is just plain
statistical data.
the beauty of correlation is that it indicates a predictive relationship
that can be exploited in practice, that's all what i am trying to say:
deeply religious population tends to be dumber ... that is what the data
says, :)
same applies to the butter production in Bangladesh vs S&P 500, if proved to
be a reliable correlation, you CAN use one to predict the other, why not?
trying to explain the correlation is the hard part. but if a correlation
exists reliably over a long period of time, chances are it is not random and
there should be some causal relationship, albeit much more convoluted and
complex involving other factors, that relates the two.
again using the butter production vs S&P 500 for example, how do you know it
is not the third common factor that caused both? maybe it is weather, maybe
it is the general well being of the global economy ...
but to say they are completely random and has nothing to do with each other
and they just "happened" to correlate with each other so nicely is by far
more reckless and even border-lining stupid...
objections?
【在 l**********t 的大作中提到】 : good one... . : 不过你要想让一些非基明白 correlation and causality 的关系, 可能有点难。 : : the
|
c****p 发帖数: 6474 | 17 你追求IQ,他追求EQ,我追求幸福喜乐平安。
不信教就不幸福喜乐平安了么……
【在 x*a 的大作中提到】 : 各人追求不同。 : 你追求IQ,他追求EQ,我追求幸福喜乐平安。 : 你追到了你想追的,恭喜。 : 而已。
|